OgreMkV
Posts: 3668 Joined: Oct. 2009
|
Quote (Southstar @ Dec. 27 2011,11:35) | Quote (Dr.GH @ Dec. 25 2011,11:02) | Quote (Southstar @ Dec. 23 2011,07:42) | By the way finally ioseb admitted the following:
"As far as science is concerned, I consider it valid only and esclusively if it is not in contrast with the word of Jehova". |
ioseb might find the following observations worth think on for a while;
"In discussing questions of this kind two rules are to be observed, as Augustine teaches. The first is, to hold to the truth of Scripture without wavering. The second is that since Holy Scripture can be explained in a multiplicity of senses, one should adhere to a particular explanation only in such measure as to be ready to abandon it if it be proved with certainty to be false, lest Holy Scripture be exposed to the ridicule of unbelievers, and obstacles be placed to their believing." - Thomas Aquinas, c.a. 1225 - 1274, Summa Theologica, Prima Pars, Q68. Art 1. (1273).
“Tis a dangerous thing to engage the authority of scripture in disputes about the natural world in opposition to reason; lest time, which brings all things to light, should discover that to be evidently false which we had made scripture assert.” Telluris theoria sacra (1684 English edition, “The Sacred Theory of the Earth” Preface, pg. 10), Reverend Thomas Burnett (1635?-1715)
"If sound science appears to contradict the Bible, we may be sure that it is our interpretation of the Bible that is at fault." Christian Observer, 1832, pg. 437; |
Yes I could post them to him, but I'd rather let him do the damage that he is doing by himself to his followers.
Besides he is too full of himself to understand anyway.
Here is how he thought he solved the HLA complex and Noah problem.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.....8489735
http://www.nature.com/ng....0....07.html
In two words: it's not mutation its recombination and or conversion lol
Merry christmas to everyone Marty |
Funny, that's the same article that everyone links to.
Doesn't matter. It still can't happen 4,000 years. That's barely 200 generations.
Plus, they have to account for the fact that the spread of HLA-A alleles can be used to trace populations.
-------------- Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.
http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat
|