Joined: Oct. 2009
|Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Dec. 17 2011,07:54)|
|Quote (OgreMkV @ Dec. 17 2011,07:41)|
|Quote (Southstar @ Dec. 17 2011,02:09)|
|Quote (Cubist @ Dec. 16 2011,15:30)|
I was wondering if anyone new why has the talk origins archive not any longer updated .
Also would it be possible to translate it into other languages? Any idea on who I should talk to?
Also I was wondering about the Bio-complexity org. I mean anyone can see that it's a fake pseudoscience journal, where the peer -reviewers are the same people as the editors. Doug Axe has writtne 3 out of the 5 articles and he's the managing director LOL. But If I mention it, people could answer well, it's just because you don't know enough, no real scientist has anything to say about this respectable institute.
Now I'm sure this is not true... do you have any links to science journals/scientists that indicate what this organisation really is...?
My take on that is that scientific enterprises are based on trust. If a people trust a journal... it has shown itself to be trustworthy... then people follow it and it has an impact to the scientific community.
Biologos, well, as far as I can tell, it has zero impact in the scientific community. It's not that people think it is disreputable... no one really cares.
Bio-Complexity != Biologos
Bio-Complexity is disreputable and should be known to be so.
Sorry... I'll go away now... I am too exhausted to think.
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.