Joined: June 2006
|Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 02 2010,08:36)|
|Quote (KCdgw @ Mar. 02 2010,08:31)|
|Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 02 2010,08:01)|
|Quote (Louis @ Mar. 01 2010,11:18)|
|Has the tardgasm finished? Is Joe sitting somewhere all sweaty and flushed after his tardsturbation?|
If so, the Drama Llama has paid the Richard Dawkins Forums a visit. Watch the internets melt down over there. At least it's a more articulate -gasm of some species than Joe's outpourings.
No asshole- you are still alive and I am sure you have more tard to spew.
Somewhere Pavlov is smiling.
Smiling AT you-, you ding-a-ling
This is a small sample of your inability to properly insult people. Also, it has relevance to your inability to properly construct jokes.
The response should not have been "Smiling AT you." This would indicate that the original sentence had referenced you directly but gotten the preposition wrong. Your emphasis of the preposition would be funny if you were in fact punning on the error (or perceived error) of the original statement. Sadly, this is not the case.
The response should have been "Smiling at YOU." This would indicate both your understanding that the original line was intended as a jibe at yourself and that you have some superior knowledge that allows you know the real jibe should be taken at the speaker.
This is basic stuff, Joe. I think you have it in you to be funny. My offer of acting and improvisation classes is still open.
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG
And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin