RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (2) < [1] 2 >   
  Topic: Why ID doesn't look like Real Design Detection, Reed's entrance exam for FTK< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 16 2008,09:13   

That's right; completely off topic!

Once again the article shows clearly:

1. that scientists disagree with one another

2. that they explore ideas that run contrary to current thought

3. that they are driven by a desire for new knowledge.

All of these things are exactly what the ID community says scientists don't do.

Your erasing my comment doesn't change any of that, Ftk.

Why don't you address the issue of the ID community's fabrication of the scientific enterprise instead of trying to edit reality?

Cross-posted to somewhere intellectually honest.

From here.

But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

  32 replies since July 15 2008,18:17 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (2) < [1] 2 >   

Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]