RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (2) < [1] 2 >   
  Topic: Why ID doesn't look like Real Design Detection, Reed's entrance exam for FTK< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 15 2008,23:03   

Does this deserve its own thread?

Not sure, but I think a case can be made.  If the case rests solely upon Ftk's participation, then no.  However, I think the topic goes well beyond Ftk.

Why do IDiots gravitate toward archeology and forensic science?  What makes them think the comparison is accurate?  Where are the blindspots (besides the obvious tardity) that make them unable to filter human activity (which leads them to their CSI bullshit)?

But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

  32 replies since July 15 2008,18:17 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (2) < [1] 2 >   

Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]