Joined: June 2006
|That would be a serious blow to the multiverse explanations of fine tuning, such as the superstring landscape or cosmological evolution, explanations that rely on the fact that there is no fundamental theory...|
This isn't correct is it? I'm no cosmologist but theories such as M-Theory and brane worlds do not imply that there is no fundamental theory of everything, right? In fact, string theory (as far out and perhaps untestable as it is) is a quest for a unified theory. So I don't get how disproving any of these is really an argument for CID.
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG
And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin