RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (37) < ... 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 >   
  Topic: Daniel Smith's "Argument from Impossibility", in which assumptions are facts< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 02 2009,19:17   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 02 2009,18:42)
To my knowledge, the "tooth fairy" has never been defined as an omniscient being.

Since life requires that - by the same logic, the tooth fairy is ruled out.

I hereby define the "tooth fairy" as an omniscient omnipotent being who, while it can control all space-time, chooses to deal only with teeth and the origin of life.

Therefore life requires the "tooth fairy" and the "tooth fairy" explains the origin of life and is necessary for the origin of life. After all, without life there are no teeth!

Will that do? Or do you demand that I dress up in some odd clothes first like your priests do before my declarations are "true" and are accepted by you as the directly (honestly, I'm not pretending or deluded) communicated word of whatever magic man in the sky you believe in?



--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 02 2009,19:31   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ Sep. 22 2007,04:48)
I have not made my mind up in regard to the age of the earth/cosmos as I have not seen all the evidence and probably do not have the expertise to rightly interpret it.

My main problem is that I want to see unbiased and unadulterated evidence; not evidence that is made-to-fit the observers viewpoint.  I'm finding that hard to do - since both sides of this issue tend to color the evidence with their own interpretive brush.
   
Quote (Daniel Smith @ Sep. 26 2007,06:01)
  I need to see the evidence for myself - I won't just take your word for it.  

And when I asked you

e) Did every human but 8 die in a global flood?

You said
       
Quote
I believe in the flood, but only because I haven't seen the evidence against it.  My main reason for believing it (other than the bible), is that the landscape looks like the aftermath of massive flood runoff when viewed from the air.  Not very scientific, I know but that's where I'm at.  (insert joke here)


Answer the question.

Was the world population of humans down to 8 people at one time or not? Forget about the flood, you obviously are too scared to talk about that. Just answer the question, yes or no.

Did all but 8 people die less then 10,000 years ago or not?

You believe it, therefore you must have evidence for it right? You say you won't believe things unless you see the evidence for yourself. Yet somehow you knew that life was designed before you even had a basic understanding of biology. How does that work out?

And if your "evidence" is the bible, then how does that fit with    
Quote
I want to see unbiased and unadulterated evidence; not evidence that is made-to-fit the observers viewpoint.


Do you need two toothbrushes for those two faces of yours?

As Daniel won't answer me, somebody else ask him about the 8 people issue! That's something where the evidence can be examined!

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 02 2009,20:29   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 02 2009,18:46)
I've been thinking about taking my arguments elsewhere for some time now.

This place is starting to bore me.

The only boring part is your notion that you need a god to make your life tolerable.

Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
rhmc



Posts: 340
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 02 2009,20:35   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ May 02 2009,20:31)
Answer the question.

Was the world population of humans down to 8 people at one time or not? Forget about the flood, you obviously are too scared to talk about that. Just answer the question, yes or no.

Did all but 8 people die less then 10,000 years ago or not?

so i, too, ask:  Did all but 8 people die less then 10,000 years ago or not?

and, the bonus question: why is daniel so afraid of theoldman's questions?

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,04:02   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 03 2009,00:46)
Quote (Alan Fox @ May 02 2009,09:32)
Do you look in at Uncommon descent? A commenter, Hazel posted this recently:

     
Quote
Theistic evolution posits that God is present in all events - not in an “interfering” way, but rather as an active participant. Christians don’t doubt that God is subtly guiding their lives towards the ends that God desires, so I don’t see why they would doubt that God could likewise guide evolution.


You might find find the discussions there a little more sympathetic. Link

You might also give  Allen MacNeill's website a look. He might have a little more patience with you.

I've been thinking about taking my arguments elsewhere for some time now.

This place is starting to bore me.

We'll see.

You're getting bored? Well fuck me sideways with a bargepole!

Your arguments consist of little more than "Wahhh look at X it must be due to god it's too complex" and "Waahhhh you'll never have an answer sufficiently detailed for me" and you think this place is boring?

Do get over yourself, sweetheart!

You've been boring the tits off people here for about 30 of the 34 pages of this thread, the thread before that and umpteen incursions onto the Wall. Your piss ignorant arrogance has prevented you from learning anything, let alone looking anything up beyond a Google, and your incessant recycling of the same, well refuted, nonsensical, illogical bullshit borders of the pathological.

The Dunning-Kruger effect might as well have been described based on you alone, not only are you clueless but you are too clueless to know it. Even shock tactics fail to penetrate that sphere of stupid that you call a cranium. Go somewhere else? Please do! Send someone interesting back instead.

Or of course you *could* start to learn some basic philosophy, pick up a book or two, you know actually do the work. But we all know you're both incapable and unwilling, no matter how politely, or how rudely, you are dealt with.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Quack



Posts: 1961
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,04:05   

Quote
I've been thinking about taking my arguments elsewhere for some time now.

This place is starting to bore me.


Homesick for the Bathroom Wall?

--------------
Rocks have no biology.
              Robert Byers.

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,04:07   

Quote (rhmc @ May 03 2009,02:35)
Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ May 02 2009,20:31)
Answer the question.

Was the world population of humans down to 8 people at one time or not? Forget about the flood, you obviously are too scared to talk about that. Just answer the question, yes or no.

Did all but 8 people die less then 10,000 years ago or not?

so i, too, ask:  Did all but 8 people die less then 10,000 years ago or not?

and, the bonus question: why is daniel so afraid of theoldman's questions?

I'll field those questions on Denial's behalf:

1) No. (There was a bottleneck, but from what we can tell it was a bottleneck much less narrow than 8 people)

2) He's as transparent as a sheet of magic super glass that is transparent to all frequencies of radiation and matter. He is afraid of anyone who sees through him. Oldman had his number, as did basically everyone, a long time ago. Some people were nicer about it, some people weren't.

Period.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,04:20   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 03 2009,00:44)
Quote (Alan Fox @ May 02 2009,09:15)
 
Quote
The point is - Life requires God.


Maybe, Dan, but it's an issue beyond the scope of science.

Which is kinda what I've been saying for awhile here Alan.

What's that quote in your sign for then?

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,04:21   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 03 2009,00:42)
Quote (Lou FCD @ May 02 2009,09:51)
   
Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 02 2009,12:04)
   
Quote (Alan Fox @ April 30 2009,14:25)
       
Quote
...I wind my merry way...
That's wend, I think.</nitpick>

Hi Dan.

I'd ask what's the point, but...

What's the point?

Hi Alan.

The point is - Life requires God.

By the same logic, it requires the tooth fairy.

To my knowledge, the "tooth fairy" has never been defined as an omniscient being.

Since life requires that - by the same logic, the tooth fairy is ruled out.

We await your imminent conversion to sikhism with baited breath.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
rhmc



Posts: 340
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,09:38   

Quote (Louis @ May 03 2009,05:07)
1) No. (There was a bottleneck, but from what we can tell it was a bottleneck much less narrow than 8 people)

any estimates available on how narrow a bottleneck that was?

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,09:51   

Quote (rhmc @ May 03 2009,17:38)
Quote (Louis @ May 03 2009,05:07)
1) No. (There was a bottleneck, but from what we can tell it was a bottleneck much less narrow than 8 people)

any estimates available on how narrow a bottleneck that was?

Right now Daniel is praying for god to come back so he can answer that question for him.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,10:32   

If there were only 8 people alive just 6000 years ago, as we can see such a bottleneck in Cheetahs then we should be able to see it in humans too, but even more then in Cheetahs. 8 people. 6000 years ago. How's your popluation growth maths Denial?

Daniel, read this
http://richarddawkins.net/forum....72603b2
And then come back and tell me if you still believe in a global flood...

Denial, if there were only 8 people alive 6000 years ago who built the pyramids?

In your CNC workshop, do you tell your workmates about your ideas? What do they say?

Edited for clarity, sorta.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Schroedinger's Dog



Posts: 1692
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,10:43   

Quote (Louis @ May 03 2009,11:21)
Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 03 2009,00:42)
 
Quote (Lou FCD @ May 02 2009,09:51)
     
Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 02 2009,12:04)
     
Quote (Alan Fox @ April 30 2009,14:25)
         
Quote
...I wind my merry way...
That's wend, I think.</nitpick>

Hi Dan.

I'd ask what's the point, but...

What's the point?

Hi Alan.

The point is - Life requires God.

By the same logic, it requires the tooth fairy.

To my knowledge, the "tooth fairy" has never been defined as an omniscient being.

Since life requires that - by the same logic, the tooth fairy is ruled out.

Wow! I just ticked on that one.

How did you get to that conclusion, that "life requires an omniscient being"?

Got any interesting, peer reviewed paper on that point?

And to follow the trend: 8 people on a boat for 40 days? That's either very kinky or just plain bad luck for the goats...

--------------
"Hail is made out of water? Are you really that stupid?" Joe G

"I have a better suggestion, Kris. How about a game of hide and go fuck yourself instead." Louis

"The reason people use a crucifix against vampires is that vampires are allergic to bullshit" Richard Pryor

   
Quack



Posts: 1961
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,11:10   

IIRC, 40 days it took to flood the Earth, but many more days had to be spent sailing the waves.

--------------
Rocks have no biology.
              Robert Byers.

  
Schroedinger's Dog



Posts: 1692
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,11:19   

Quote (Quack @ May 03 2009,18:10)
IIRC, 40 days it took to flood the Earth, but many more days had to be spent sailing the waves.

Poor, poor goats...

--------------
"Hail is made out of water? Are you really that stupid?" Joe G

"I have a better suggestion, Kris. How about a game of hide and go fuck yourself instead." Louis

"The reason people use a crucifix against vampires is that vampires are allergic to bullshit" Richard Pryor

   
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,11:45   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ May 02 2009,19:17)
Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 02 2009,18:42)
To my knowledge, the "tooth fairy" has never been defined as an omniscient being.

Since life requires that - by the same logic, the tooth fairy is ruled out.

I hereby define the "tooth fairy" as an omniscient omnipotent being who, while it can control all space-time, chooses to deal only with teeth and the origin of life.

Therefore life requires the "tooth fairy" and the "tooth fairy" explains the origin of life and is necessary for the origin of life. After all, without life there are no teeth!

Will that do? Or do you demand that I dress up in some odd clothes first like your priests do before my declarations are "true" and are accepted by you as the directly (honestly, I'm not pretending or deluded) communicated word of whatever magic man in the sky you believe in?


odds are this poor sod will ignore this.  beautiful.

life requires god because he defined it that way.

I've been trying to get Denial to either man up and bring the tard or to fuck off, for about 20 pages.

Banal fuck off.  Or talk about the flud.  or quit bullshitting about science which you are ignorant of and  indifferent or apathetic about.  tell us about your last vacation but please not another word about your beliefs and how you wish they were true but not so much that you actually empirically evaluate said beliefs.

i predict fuckface will ignore this and start continue rambling incoherently about proof and detail and his definitions.

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Schroedinger's Dog



Posts: 1692
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,12:04   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ May 03 2009,18:45)
Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ May 02 2009,19:17)
Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 02 2009,18:42)
To my knowledge, the "tooth fairy" has never been defined as an omniscient being.

Since life requires that - by the same logic, the tooth fairy is ruled out.

I hereby define the "tooth fairy" as an omniscient omnipotent being who, while it can control all space-time, chooses to deal only with teeth and the origin of life.

Therefore life requires the "tooth fairy" and the "tooth fairy" explains the origin of life and is necessary for the origin of life. After all, without life there are no teeth!

Will that do? Or do you demand that I dress up in some odd clothes first like your priests do before my declarations are "true" and are accepted by you as the directly (honestly, I'm not pretending or deluded) communicated word of whatever magic man in the sky you believe in?


odds are this poor sod will ignore this.  beautiful.

life requires god because he defined it that way.

I've been trying to get Denial to either man up and bring the tard or to fuck off, for about 20 pages.

Banal fuck off.  Or talk about the flud.  or quit bullshitting about science which you are ignorant of and  indifferent or apathetic about.  tell us about your last vacation but please not another word about your beliefs and how you wish they were true but not so much that you actually empirically evaluate said beliefs.

i predict fuckface will ignore this and start continue rambling incoherently about proof and detail and his definitions.

Oh, sorry Ras, you covered that already. I was just so attracted to the pic to read the content.

Ooooohhh! SHINY!

--------------
"Hail is made out of water? Are you really that stupid?" Joe G

"I have a better suggestion, Kris. How about a game of hide and go fuck yourself instead." Louis

"The reason people use a crucifix against vampires is that vampires are allergic to bullshit" Richard Pryor

   
Quack



Posts: 1961
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,14:29   

Quote (Schroedinger's Dog @ May 03 2009,11:19)
 
Quote (Quack @ May 03 2009,18:10)
IIRC, 40 days it took to flood the Earth, but many more days had to be spent sailing the waves.

Poor, poor goats...

And the lamas, that figures...

--------------
Rocks have no biology.
              Robert Byers.

  
Daniel Smith



Posts: 970
Joined: Sep. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,16:37   

Quote (rhmc @ May 02 2009,18:35)
why is daniel so afraid of theoldman's questions?

I don't read oldman's posts.  I've explained my reasons for this several times.  He knows that but just keeps on posting anyway.  Same with Louis.

--------------
"If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted as true is really true, there would be little hope of advance."  Orville Wright

"The presence or absence of a creative super-intelligence is unequivocally a scientific question."  Richard Dawkins

  
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,16:57   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 03 2009,16:37)
I don't read oldman's posts.  I've explained my reasons for this several times.  He knows that but just keeps on posting anyway.  Same with Louis.

I thought you were going away.

Bye again.

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,18:07   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 03 2009,16:37)
I don't read

I know. That's why I use so many pictures.

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
rhmc



Posts: 340
Joined: Dec. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,19:33   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 03 2009,17:37)
I don't read oldman's posts.  I've explained my reasons for this several times.  He knows that but just keeps on posting anyway.  Same with Louis.

both have posed valid questions.  

to be honest, it kinda looks like you can't answer them and that's why you claim you don't read their posts.

so, instead of reading their posts, here's two questions:

where is the evidence for the biblical flood?

where is the genetic evidence of a human population of only 8 people from which all of us descend?

  
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,22:30   

The Flood? Nah, that's water under the bridge. Or something.

Why would an exchange of comments about the Flood story be any more productive than the current theme?

Current theme: there are several observed patterns of evidence that are logically explained by evolution theory. But there are also lots of unanswered questions, as if that were somehow unexpected.

Flood: the patterns of evidence that would be expected from a singular event of that sort haven't been reported (i.e., no simultaneous worldwide discontinuities between the before and the after).

Henry

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,22:34   

rhmc

that's how it starts...

it knows that

it wants that

its here for just that

it ain't a real tard its an old troll tard
hard old troll tard
real troll old hard tard troll hard

tard tricks sticks in slick hard tard
troll sticks slick trick in old hard tard

and so on and so forth

Daniel how many puppets are you up to now buddy?  

this handle is a good one.  you claim to be a christian only to dismiss any further inquiries (we would actually like to know what has cause you to put such stubbornly positively ignorance so high on the scale of virtue) but you have nothing to say about jesus.  stand up for him son he stood up for you.  

i think you know fuckall about the bible either.  it's just part of your puppet garment aint it.  

you haven't offered a positive argument since you have been here just a bunch of wankery about how do you know something.  

i call paley on banal smith.  had me going for a while.  fish-hooked but it wasn't deep.

ETA  Henry if only.  Denial is not here to actually discuss things.  he is an old troll from way back

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,22:45   

Quote
Top Ten Signs You're a Fundamentalist Christian




10 - You vigorously deny the existence of thousands of gods claimed by other religions, but feel outraged when someone denies the existence of yours.

9 - You feel insulted and "dehumanized" when scientists say that people evolved from other life forms, but you have no problem with the Biblical claim that we were created from dirt.

8 - You laugh at polytheists, but you have no problem believing in a Triune God.

7 - Your face turns purple when you hear of the "atrocities" attributed to Allah, but you don't even flinch when hearing about how God/Jehovah slaughtered all the babies of Egypt in "Exodus" and ordered the elimination of entire ethnic groups in "Joshua" including women, children, and trees!

6 - You laugh at Hindu beliefs that deify humans, and Greek claims about gods sleeping with women, but you have no problem believing that the Holy Spirit impregnated Mary, who then gave birth to a man-god who got killed, came back to life and then ascended into the sky.

5 - You are willing to spend your life looking for little loopholes in the scientifically established age of Earth (few billion years), but you find nothing wrong with believing dates recorded by Bronze Age tribesmen sitting in their tents and guessing that Earth is a few generations old.

4 - You believe that the entire population of this planet with the exception of those who share your beliefs -- though excluding those in all rival sects - will spend Eternity in an infinite Hell of Suffering. And yet consider your religion the most "tolerant" and "loving."


3 - While modern science, history, geology, biology, and physics have failed to convince you otherwise, some idiot rolling around on the floor speaking in "tongues" may be all the evidence you need to "prove" Christianity.

2 - You define 0.01% as a "high success rate" when it comes to answered prayers. You consider that to be evidence that prayer works. And you think that the remaining 99.99% FAILURE was simply the will of God.

1 - You actually know a lot less than many atheists and agnostics do about the Bible, Christianity, and church history - but still call yourself a Christian.


--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,22:56   

yo k.e.. i am saying that probly ain't denial

most god botherers can't wait to start chirping in jesus' name.  ALL the ones that come to places like AtBC can't wait to bring that stuff.  yet banal won't even talk about the bible.

just his opinions about the epistemic content of scientific explanation at the last moment of Time.  as if anyone gave a flying fuck about him enough to convince him that payday is friday and shit runs downhill.  

my child is potty training.  it is a very similar behavior.  its not true fundieism it is interweb trollery from one of the old puppets we used to get that aren't around anymore.  and i welcome that.  but goddammit this one is mostly congenial, just vacuous.  he's not convinced he's right because he hasn't offered a single positive claim.  just a bunch of "you guys can't prove this to me" yeah well right ok

so many words to be not even wrong, well that is boring.  its a bit like skeptic used to be.  except skeptic even would know daniel is full of shit and just concern trolling for kicks

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,23:26   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 02 2009,19:42)
Quote (Lou FCD @ May 02 2009,09:51)
   
Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 02 2009,12:04)
     
Quote (Alan Fox @ April 30 2009,14:25)
         
Quote
...I wind my merry way...
That's wend, I think.</nitpick>

Hi Dan.

I'd ask what's the point, but...

What's the point?

Hi Alan.

The point is - Life requires God.

By the same logic, it requires the tooth fairy.

To my knowledge, the "tooth fairy" has never been defined as an omniscient being.

Since life requires that - by the same logic, the tooth fairy is ruled out.

No, you idiot. You assume life requires that. I contest that. Show your work.

And I contest your further assumption that the tooth fairy is not omniscient. How the hell do you suppose she knows who lost a tooth today? She is by definition omniscient.

And furthermore, she's way hotter in a short skirt than that dried up old prune you kneel before (doing god only knows what), and she's not a genocidal maniac.

Plus, there's actual evidence that she exists. Teeth go under pillows at night, money appears by the next morning. That right there is more evidence than there is for your psychotic, sociopathic blood god.

Edited by Lou FCD on May 04 2009,00:27

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Henry J



Posts: 5786
Joined: Mar. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,23:34   

Quote
How the hell do you suppose she knows who lost a tooth today?


Transcen-dental meditation?

  
Rrr



Posts: 146
Joined: Nov. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: May 04 2009,01:58   

Quote (Quack @ May 03 2009,11:10)
IIRC, 40 days it took to flood the Earth, but many more days had to be spent sailing the waves.

Impressive! Even more so than Paris, 1959. Provided, of course, that you do remember correctly...
:-)

  
Quack



Posts: 1961
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: May 04 2009,02:36   

Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 03 2009,16:37)
 
Quote (rhmc @ May 02 2009,18:35)
why is daniel so afraid of theoldman's questions?

I don't read oldman's posts.  I've explained my reasons for this several times.  He knows that but just keeps on posting anyway.  Same with Louis.

What? Do you not don't read my posts?

--------------
Rocks have no biology.
              Robert Byers.

  
  1103 replies since Jan. 26 2009,15:45 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (37) < ... 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]