RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Daniel Smith's "Argument from Impossibility", in which assumptions are facts< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Schroedinger's Dog



Posts: 1692
Joined: Jan. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: May 03 2009,10:43   

Quote (Louis @ May 03 2009,11:21)
Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 03 2009,00:42)
 
Quote (Lou FCD @ May 02 2009,09:51)
     
Quote (Daniel Smith @ May 02 2009,12:04)
     
Quote (Alan Fox @ April 30 2009,14:25)
         
Quote
...I wind my merry way...
That's wend, I think.</nitpick>

Hi Dan.

I'd ask what's the point, but...

What's the point?

Hi Alan.

The point is - Life requires God.

By the same logic, it requires the tooth fairy.

To my knowledge, the "tooth fairy" has never been defined as an omniscient being.

Since life requires that - by the same logic, the tooth fairy is ruled out.

Wow! I just ticked on that one.

How did you get to that conclusion, that "life requires an omniscient being"?

Got any interesting, peer reviewed paper on that point?

And to follow the trend: 8 people on a boat for 40 days? That's either very kinky or just plain bad luck for the goats...

--------------
"Hail is made out of water? Are you really that stupid?" Joe G

"I have a better suggestion, Kris. How about a game of hide and go fuck yourself instead." Louis

"The reason people use a crucifix against vampires is that vampires are allergic to bullshit" Richard Pryor

   
  1103 replies since Jan. 26 2009,15:45 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (37) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]