Ftk
Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007
|
| Quote (Kristine @ Jan. 02 2008,19:07) | | Quote (Ftk @ Jan. 02 2008,12:07) | | Quote (Ftk @ Jan. 02 2008,13:02) | | Quote (Albatrossity2 @ Jan. 02 2008,12:23) | | Quote (Ftk @ Jan. 02 2008,12:04) | It's disgusting to you, Dave. But, copulation with man, woman (she's bisexual), beast, and relative is okay with Skatje. So, I'm not sure why Sal is being disgusting. Are those type of relationships "disgusting", and if so, why?
Discuss....
(sorry Assi, I swear I'll get to you by the end of the day.) |
1) It's quote-mining. See the entire post from which Sal quotes, and note that he does not give a link to that post. Perhaps that is because it starts out with this | Quote | | Allow me to first tell you that I personally do not have an interest in bestiality. I don’t support it being legal because I want to hump animals. |
And yet Sal's post implies that she would have a collared peccary as a fiance.
2) She's what, 16? Sal should stick to picking on grown-ups like ERV. Of course, I have no doubts that she can eviscerate Sal verbally. But she really shouldn't have to do that.
Sal is disgusting because he is a liar (quote-mining is lying) and because he feels that 16 yr old girls are fair game for "proving" his fantasies about atheists/darwinists/evilutionists. Read that again. Sal is disgusting. Please quit trying to switch the conversation to a discussion of why (or if) bestiality is disgusting. |
Dave,
1. Sal HT'd me...so that's not quote mining. I linked to Skatje's *entire* post. I'll make sure that where he HT'd me the link is accessible for those who don't read the post right before his.
2. It doesn't matter if Skatje wants to hump animals or not. The point is that it is completely moral to do so.
3. Sal implying that "she would have a collared peccary as a fiance" is humor meant to drive the point home. For the record, this is not the type of humor I advocate. But, it is interesting to note that your outrage is only displayed when you feel someone from my side has stepped over the line in this way. For instance, Erasamus's post yesterday was just as outrageous, yet not word from you on that one...interesting.
He wrote:
| Quote | RB and I'd like for you et al to consider the following:
The time interval between the Fall and the first time that Adam realizes that he can beat his meat by himself.
The brief interlude between the closing of the doors on the ark and the first time that Noah considered banging one of his daughters, for the first time.
The moments between the first greeting between King David and Johnathan, and the time required for David to reach a full, complete erection.
The number of times Joseph wondered just who in the hell his betrothed wife had been slipping around with.
How many calluses must have been on the palm of Jesus, the virgin haploid redeemer of mankind. Alternatively, did he never masturbate? Did Jesus sometimes consider breaking his own rules so that he might relieve a little pressure? If he didn't, can we say that he is truly human? |
Evidently RB (Reciprocating Bill?) helped him with that one and has no problem with it either.
The hypocrisy is rampant at this site.
The fact that Skatje is 17 is irrelevant. She is an extremely intelligent woman who has put a LOT of thought into these matters. She's in college and has probably given more thought to these issues than most adults. |
Also, Skatje is the daughter of one of the most ardent religion bashers. It only makes sense to consider the morals of his followers and offspring when considering what our future might look like without religion. |
Wow, my dear, you know what - you can just shelve the idea of me participating in that blog diet thingie.
Because I've lost my appetite!
Whatever this ongoing, beyond-ridiculous, and nauseating pettifoggery means to you, obviously to Skatje it means no unnecessary legislation. But by all means, wallow in young earth if you think it so important to your cause.
Tell you what - weighing in. I could be 110 pounds or 310. Keep an "open mind." Goodbye, good luck, and may your God help you. I admit it's beyond me. |
Good Lord, whatever...
Visiting you people is like taking a step into bizarro world. Everything I have written about this incident has been absolute fact, and I've linked to prove it every single time. Skatje wrote that post the first of October, and I've never mentioned it until everyone thought Sal was some kind of demented villian for suggesting that bestiality might be considered acceptable from an evolutionary standpoint. Of course it is...we are part of the animal world and there is no reason why a person shouldn't engage in that type of behavior *if they want to*.
If a "creationist" (take Sal for example) had written the post that Skatje wrote on Zoophilia, you guys would have lost your ever loving minds. That post would have appeared on every one of your blogs and forums, and you'd have talked about it and linked back to it for years. It would have been linked to *immediately* rather than let it be ignored it for three months.
Kristine, you probably would have linked to it first...
--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths" -forastero
|
