argystokes
Posts: 766
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
BANNED!
| Quote | FtK, what you and Slimy Sal are doing is called innuendo and slander. You want to insinuate that the children of Darwinists are immoral who will allow bestiality and incest to run rampant; you want to claim that atheism leads to heinous offenses against civilized culture.
You're wrong. What we'd allow to run rampant is tolerance. That's all Skatje is advocating: that we can't lock people up for non-harmful, private acts. She only opposes bestiality as a crime against animals, and there are already statues in place to handle that.
But yes, you are incredibly creepy. So creepy that if every I were unfortunate enough to meet either you or Slimy Sal in person I would not shake hands with you, unless there was a washroom handy and a bucket of disinfectant available.
It's the dungeon for you. Good riddance.
Posted by: PZ Myers | January 2, 2008 8:30 PM |
Anyway, Ftk, if you ever want to continue down this conversational path, I think you should drop the word 'condone.' It has two easily confused definitions (and you've used them both in this conversation - you said you don't condone Sal's post). To me, condone most commonly means "approve of" or "support," which is the second definition in the dictionaries I've looked at, but appears to be the one that most people associate with the word. Skatje's clear that she means that she would tolerate the act, and that's probably the word you should use in the future. Otherwise the comments reek of inappropriate innuendo.
--------------
"Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?" -Calvin
|
