Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > FTK Research Thread

Pages: (25) < ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... >

Lou FCD Posts: 5455 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,14:12    Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ June 27 2007,12:36) What I always wonder, and ask people like FTK, is that why god seems to have stopped. I mean, he came along burnt some bushes, did a bit of re-decorating (teh flud) and then, 2k odd years ago just stopped. Nothing else. From hero to zero. Why? All this action (to the point of killing all but 8 people on the planet and appearing in person at times) and then nothing at all. If you are going to be a planetary overlord then just disappearing for thousands of years is just not on! He's on vacation in the Magellanic Clouds. I hear they're lovely this time of galactic rotation. -------------- “Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas? Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

Arden Chatfield Posts: 6657 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,14:33    Quote (Albatrossity2 @ June 27 2007,12:35) Quote (IanBrown_101 @ June 27 2007,12:32)     Quote (J-Dog @ June 27 2007,12:31)     Quote (IanBrown_101 @ June 27 2007,12:25) That's interesting....Your comment has made it through, yet mine was even more polite, and yet it's yet to appear. Women love cavemen.  What can I say dude. Well, maybe it was a bit daring, I mean, I asked her a direct question! My hypothesis is that Ian sounds too British and Dawkinsish; she doesn't want to engage in a civil conversation with someone like that. Now a caveman - that she can deal with! FTK likes bad boys. We've known this for months. -------------- "Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

Richardthughes Posts: 11178 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,14:35    Quote (Arden Chatfield @ June 27 2007,14:33) Quote (Albatrossity2 @ June 27 2007,12:35)   Quote (IanBrown_101 @ June 27 2007,12:32)     Quote (J-Dog @ June 27 2007,12:31)       Quote (IanBrown_101 @ June 27 2007,12:25) That's interesting....Your comment has made it through, yet mine was even more polite, and yet it's yet to appear. Women love cavemen.  What can I say dude. Well, maybe it was a bit daring, I mean, I asked her a direct question! My hypothesis is that Ian sounds too British and Dawkinsish; she doesn't want to engage in a civil conversation with someone like that. Now a caveman - that she can deal with! FTK likes bad boys. We've known this for months. WATCHOO SAYIN? -------------- "Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield "You magnificent bastard! " : Louis "ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard "I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932 "...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

Arden Chatfield Posts: 6657 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,15:03    Quote (Richardthughes @ June 27 2007,14:35) Quote (Arden Chatfield @ June 27 2007,14:33)   Quote (Albatrossity2 @ June 27 2007,12:35)     Quote (IanBrown_101 @ June 27 2007,12:32)       Quote (J-Dog @ June 27 2007,12:31)         Quote (IanBrown_101 @ June 27 2007,12:25) That's interesting....Your comment has made it through, yet mine was even more polite, and yet it's yet to appear. Women love cavemen.  What can I say dude. Well, maybe it was a bit daring, I mean, I asked her a direct question! My hypothesis is that Ian sounds too British and Dawkinsish; she doesn't want to engage in a civil conversation with someone like that. Now a caveman - that she can deal with! FTK likes bad boys. We've known this for months. WATCHOO SAYIN? I stand by my statement. -------------- "Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

IanBrown_101 Posts: 927 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,15:07    Hey FtK, you seem to be on, so hows about explaining the non existance of my posts on your blog. Or mayhap you just want to go back to the Walt Brown book, I can do that if you like. -------------- I'm not the fastest or the baddest or the fatest. You NEVER seem to address the fact that the grand majority of people supporting Darwinism in these on line forums and blogs are atheists. That doesn't seem to bother you guys in the least. - FtK Roddenberry is my God.

Ftk Posts: 2239 Joined: Mar. 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,15:29    Ian, I guess I'm having an Icky moment.  Read the last few pages (or the whole thread for that matter) and let me know if you would respond in an environment like this if the tables were turned and this venue were a hostile ID forum. There's really no point in dialogue on these topics because it does nothing other than stoke the fires.  Answer one question, up pops another...there's no end to it (from both sides).  We're never going to see eye to eye. This just isn't productive, and I'd be better off spending more time with my family than wasting my time here. But, if Richard sticks around, I'm might be compelled to chime in from time to time...  I really have no idea why I am so attracted to that cute little tard hat. -------------- "Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

IanBrown_101 Posts: 927 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,15:31    Quote (Ftk @ June 27 2007,15:29) Ian, I guess I'm having an Icky moment.  Read the last few pages (or the whole thread for that matter) and let me know if you would respond in an environment like this if the tables were turned and this venue were a hostile ID forum. There's really no point in dialogue on these topics because it does nothing other than stoke the fires.  Answer one question, up pops another...there's no end to it (from both sides).  We're never going to see eye to eye. This just isn't productive, and I'd be better off spending more time with my family than wasting my time here. But, if Richard sticks around, I'm might be compelled to chime in from time to time... ;)  I really have no idea why I am so attracted to that cute little tard hat. So what the hell was the point of the post? Why do you seem to want a discussion with J-Dog about it? This isn't a particularly hostile forum FtK, just because the members are tired of seeing the same stuff over and over again doesn't mean they're nasty men. Anyway, to take an ID blog at random, if I WERE to comment on UD, for example, I would be banned quite qickly for not toeing the party line. However, if this were not true, then yes, I would still comment. What is the point of just talking to people who think the same as you? Gets boring surely? -------------- I'm not the fastest or the baddest or the fatest. You NEVER seem to address the fact that the grand majority of people supporting Darwinism in these on line forums and blogs are atheists. That doesn't seem to bother you guys in the least. - FtK Roddenberry is my God.

Ftk Posts: 2239 Joined: Mar. 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,15:53    That's why I have a blog.  I can vent, I can converse, and, yes, I can moderate.   I don't think you understand how many inane comments I get on my blog.  Many times I also get the same type of comment from several people.   I also know many of the commenters and even though sometimes someone might put through a comment that sounds civil, I know that the person has no interest in civility whatsoever.  In that case, I won't even put the first comment through because, in the end, I know where the conversation is going to end up.  A good example would be Blipey.  I recently read a conversation between him and Joe G. that was seriously freaky.  Why let conversation get that out of control?  I don't like it when I look back and see stuff that I've written when I'm frustrated, and there is no point in getting to that point.  Nothing is accomplished by it. -------------- "Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

oldmanintheskydidntdoit Posts: 4999 Joined: July 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,15:53    FTK, simple question which I don't expect an answer to, but if there was a worldwide flood, where in the geological column can I locate the sediments that would have been desposited? Have you got to that bit yet in the online book you are talking about? It's a simple question with an obvious answer. -------------- I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies". FTK if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand Gordon Mullings

oldmanintheskydidntdoit Posts: 4999 Joined: July 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,15:55    Quote (Ftk @ June 27 2007,15:53) sometimes someone might put through a comment that sounds civil, I know that the person has no interest in civility whatsoever.  In that case, I won't even put the first comment through because, in the end, I know where the conversation is going to end up. Censorship for Jesus. Now i've seen it all. No wonder you and DaveScot get on. -------------- I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies". FTK if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand Gordon Mullings

IanBrown_101 Posts: 927 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,15:55    Quote (Ftk @ June 27 2007,15:53) That's why I have a blog.  I can vent, I can converse, and, yes, I can moderate.   I don't think you understand how many inane comments I get on my blog.  Many times I also get the same type of comment from several people.   I also know many of the commenters and even though sometimes someone might put through a comment that sounds civil, I know that the person has no interest in civility whatsoever.  In that case, I won't even put the first comment through because, in the end, I know where the conversation is going to end up.  A good example would be Blipey.  I recently read a conversation between him and Joe G. that was seriously freaky.  Why let conversation get that out of control?  I don't like it when I look back and see stuff that I've written when I'm frustrated, and there is no point in getting to that point.  Nothing is accomplished by it. So you think I'm looking for blood or something? That I DON'T want a civil discussion? I've been looking for one for a while now, and I thought I might have found it. -------------- I'm not the fastest or the baddest or the fatest. You NEVER seem to address the fact that the grand majority of people supporting Darwinism in these on line forums and blogs are atheists. That doesn't seem to bother you guys in the least. - FtK Roddenberry is my God.

Richardthughes Posts: 11178 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,16:01    Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ June 27 2007,15:55) Quote (Ftk @ June 27 2007,15:53) sometimes someone might put through a comment that sounds civil, I know that the person has no interest in civility whatsoever.  In that case, I won't even put the first comment through because, in the end, I know where the conversation is going to end up. Censorship for Jesus. Now i've seen it all. No wonder you and DaveScot get on. C*nsorship and telepathy for Jesus, PUH-LEASE! -------------- "Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield "You magnificent bastard! " : Louis "ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard "I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932 "...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

carlsonjok Posts: 3326 Joined: May 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,16:06    Quote (Ftk @ June 27 2007,15:53) I also know many of the commenters and even though sometimes someone might put through a comment that sounds civil, I know that the person has no interest in civility whatsoever.  In that case, I won't even put the first comment through because, in the end, I know where the conversation is going to end up.  A good example would be Blipey.  I recently read a conversation between him and Joe G. that was seriously freaky.  Why let conversation get that out of control? You consider it better to wring all the spontaneity out of people communicating?  Maybe it would be more pleasant if everyone played the parts you script for them? Hey! It just occurred to me that Blipey is an actor.  I'll bet he'd have no problem reading his part and hitting his marks.   ACTING!! THANK YOU!! -------------- It's natural to be curious about our world, but the scientific method is just one theory about how to best understand it.  We live in a democracy, which means we should treat every theory equally. - Steven Colbert, I Am America (and So Can You!)

Ftk Posts: 2239 Joined: Mar. 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,16:07    sigh...Ian, I only saw one comment from you in moderation and it was in reference to being irritated that I didn't put through a previous comment of yours.   Did you by any chance post under a different name the first time? -------------- "Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

IanBrown_101 Posts: 927 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,16:08    Quote (carlsonjok @ June 27 2007,16:06) Quote (Ftk @ June 27 2007,15:53) I also know many of the commenters and even though sometimes someone might put through a comment that sounds civil, I know that the person has no interest in civility whatsoever.  In that case, I won't even put the first comment through because, in the end, I know where the conversation is going to end up.  A good example would be Blipey.  I recently read a conversation between him and Joe G. that was seriously freaky.  Why let conversation get that out of control? You consider it better to wring all the spontaneity out of people communicating?  Maybe it would be more pleasant if everyone played the parts you script for them? Hey! It just occurred to me that Blipey is an actor.  I'll bet he'd have no problem reading his part and hitting his marks.   ACTING!! THANK YOU!! Spontaneity makes baby jesus cry. -------------- I'm not the fastest or the baddest or the fatest. You NEVER seem to address the fact that the grand majority of people supporting Darwinism in these on line forums and blogs are atheists. That doesn't seem to bother you guys in the least. - FtK Roddenberry is my God.

IanBrown_101 Posts: 927 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,16:09    Quote (Ftk @ June 27 2007,16:07) sigh...Ian, I only saw one comment from you in moderation and it was in reference to being irritated that I didn't put through a previous comment of yours.   Did you by any chance post under a different name the first time? Nope. I posted three, including the complaint one, all adressed as IanBrown_101. It IS possible I made a typo, so maybe IaBrown_101 or something similar might have cropped up, but nothing that wasn't at least somewhat close to me. -------------- I'm not the fastest or the baddest or the fatest. You NEVER seem to address the fact that the grand majority of people supporting Darwinism in these on line forums and blogs are atheists. That doesn't seem to bother you guys in the least. - FtK Roddenberry is my God.

Ftk Posts: 2239 Joined: Mar. 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,16:10    Quote (carlsonjok @ June 27 2007,16:06) Quote (Ftk @ June 27 2007,15:53) I also know many of the commenters and even though sometimes someone might put through a comment that sounds civil, I know that the person has no interest in civility whatsoever.  In that case, I won't even put the first comment through because, in the end, I know where the conversation is going to end up.  A good example would be Blipey.  I recently read a conversation between him and Joe G. that was seriously freaky.  Why let conversation get that out of control? You consider it better to wring all the spontaneity out of people communicating?  Maybe it would be more pleasant if everyone played the parts you script for them? Hey! It just occurred to me that Blipey is an actor.  I'll bet he'd have no problem reading his part and hitting his marks.   ACTING!! THANK YOU!! Spontaneity is one thing, insanity, OTOH, is something I'd rather try to steer clear from. -------------- "Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

IanBrown_101 Posts: 927 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,16:12    Quote (Ftk @ June 27 2007,16:10) Quote (carlsonjok @ June 27 2007,16:06) Quote (Ftk @ June 27 2007,15:53) I also know many of the commenters and even though sometimes someone might put through a comment that sounds civil, I know that the person has no interest in civility whatsoever.  In that case, I won't even put the first comment through because, in the end, I know where the conversation is going to end up.  A good example would be Blipey.  I recently read a conversation between him and Joe G. that was seriously freaky.  Why let conversation get that out of control? You consider it better to wring all the spontaneity out of people communicating?  Maybe it would be more pleasant if everyone played the parts you script for them? Hey! It just occurred to me that Blipey is an actor.  I'll bet he'd have no problem reading his part and hitting his marks.   ACTING!! THANK YOU!! Spontaneity is one thing, insanity, OTOH, is something I'd rather try to steer clear from. Ah, AirFarceDave banned on your blog is he? Just my little joke... -------------- I'm not the fastest or the baddest or the fatest. You NEVER seem to address the fact that the grand majority of people supporting Darwinism in these on line forums and blogs are atheists. That doesn't seem to bother you guys in the least. - FtK Roddenberry is my God.

Ftk Posts: 2239 Joined: Mar. 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,16:18    There was something with a 101 attached, but it wasn't Ian. Look, try again when the spirit moves you and I'll probably let your stuff fly.  The thing is, Ian, that I'm not all that sure how serious you really are about dialogue.   You question me, then someone here slams me, and then you join their band wagon immediately.  I don't care if you disagree with me, but someone who is seriously interested in civil conversation wouldn't join in the slaughter as well. -------------- "Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

IanBrown_101 Posts: 927 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,16:21    Quote (Ftk @ June 27 2007,16:18) There was something with a 101 attached, but it wasn't Ian. Look, try again when the spirit moves you and I'll probably let your stuff fly.  The thing is, Ian, that I'm not all that sure how serious you really are about dialogue.   You question me, then someone here slams me, and then you join their band wagon immediately.  I don't care if you disagree with me, but someone who is seriously interested in civil conversation wouldn't join in the slaughter as well. I just retried. Honestly, I don't think I've particularly joined in on any slaughter. Gentle mocking, yes, but then I gently mock EVERYONE, so get used to it. If I have joined in a huge massacre, I appologise. I like joining in on jokes, if I find them amusing, but I doubt there will ever be malice behind it, since I really do want a civil discussion. I might call something you SAY ridiculous, laughable etc, but I'm not sticking the knife in, I'm just being somewhat blunt about it. I appologise for that. -------------- I'm not the fastest or the baddest or the fatest. You NEVER seem to address the fact that the grand majority of people supporting Darwinism in these on line forums and blogs are atheists. That doesn't seem to bother you guys in the least. - FtK Roddenberry is my God.

oldmanintheskydidntdoit Posts: 4999 Joined: July 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,16:27    Quote (Ftk @ June 27 2007,16:07) sigh...Ian, I only saw one comment from you in moderation and it was in reference to being irritated that I didn't put through a previous comment of yours.   Did you by any chance post under a different name the first time? sounds like you delete most comments. What are you afraid of? And this is the FTK research thread, so i'm allowed *stamps feet* You want civil ignore me in your FtK Walt Brown book thread instead  :p Carry on ignoring my 5 yr old simple "which layer is the flood sediment" question over there, it's fine. Soon up to 500 posts FTK. That's more then on your own blog I suspect! -------------- I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies". FTK if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand Gordon Mullings

Ftk Posts: 2239 Joined: Mar. 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,16:48    Okay, Ian, I put you through.  I remember that comment, but I don't remember your name attached.  I deleted it because I've answered it so many times, I grow weary. I deleted about 5 other comments that were content free, but of course put Richard's comment through.  Not much there to work with, but it's just impossible for me to ignore him. -------------- "Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

IanBrown_101 Posts: 927 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,16:53    Quote (Ftk @ June 27 2007,16:48) Okay, Ian, I put you through.  I remember that comment, but I don't remember your name attached.  I deleted it because I've answered it so many times, I grow weary. I deleted about 5 other comments that were content free, but of course put Richard's comment through.  Not much there to work with, but it's just impossible for me to ignore him. :( That's fine FtK, I'VE never had it answered before, and so long as I don't just get a "fuck off" or similar response, then all is well, and discussion can continue. -------------- I'm not the fastest or the baddest or the fatest. You NEVER seem to address the fact that the grand majority of people supporting Darwinism in these on line forums and blogs are atheists. That doesn't seem to bother you guys in the least. - FtK Roddenberry is my God.

blipey Posts: 2061 Joined: June 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,17:15    Quote Read the last few pages (or the whole thread for that matter) and let me know if you would respond in an environment like this if the tables were turned and this venue were a hostile ID forum. Yep.  has crossed my mind, Ftk.  In fact, most of us have gone to just about every ID site out there and provided content.  For that trouble, we have been banned.  So, yeah.  I guess we would respond in hostile environments.  Isn't it interesting that we allow you to do what your friends will not? -------------- But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank Posts: 2560 Joined: Feb. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,18:00    Quote (Arden Chatfield @ June 27 2007,12:32) It's interesting to ponder why FTK is so totally obsessed with atheists. I suspect she's compensating for something here. Well, like ALL fundies, she has no faith.  None at all.  Not a shred.  Which is why, like ALL fundies, she is so desperately in need of "proof". But then, whaddya expect from a group of people who worship a Book About God instead of a God, and are too dumb to tell the difference?  (shrug) -------------- Editor, Red and Black Publishers www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank Posts: 2560 Joined: Feb. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,18:04    Quote (Ftk @ June 27 2007,15:29)  Read the last few pages (or the whole thread for that matter) and let me know if you would respond in an environment like this if the tables were turned and this venue were a hostile ID forum. We'd all have been banned after two posts.  (shrug) Notice that YOU have not been banned HERE (though you did go stomping out, twice, all in a huff). Does that tell you something? BTW, if it's so frightfully mean to you here, why the hell do you keep coming back? Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, that's right . . . .   That wheelbarrow full of martyrdom that you carry around with you and show off so proudly. -------------- Editor, Red and Black Publishers www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank Posts: 2560 Joined: Feb. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,18:06    Quote (Ftk @ June 27 2007,16:10) insanity, OTOH, is something I'd rather try to steer clear from. Jesus H Christ, how can I be good if you keep lobbing softballs like THIS one to me . . . . . . . ?  I'm only human, dammit. -------------- Editor, Red and Black Publishers www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

oldmanintheskydidntdoit Posts: 4999 Joined: July 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,18:09    FTK posted this on her blog Quote This entails consideration of much more than the scientific facts surrounding evolution. History, archaeology, prophetic accuracy, and the statistical probabilities that life arose from mere matter all have to be considered as well. prophetic accuracy? That I think is a new one! Like what, exactly? Predictions required! I predict you'll never give me those speculation taught as fact examples in that biology textbook you now have. -------------- I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies". FTK if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand Gordon Mullings

Richardthughes Posts: 11178 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,18:17    Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ June 27 2007,18:09) FTK posted this on her blog   Quote This entails consideration of much more than the scientific facts surrounding evolution. History, archaeology, prophetic accuracy, and the statistical probabilities that life arose from mere matter all have to be considered as well. prophetic accuracy? That I think is a new one! Like what, exactly? Predictions required! I predict you'll never give me those speculation taught as fact examples in that biology textbook you now have. History: Jesus not mentioned outside of the bible in works of that era. Early Bibles have no virgin birth, "son of god" or resurrection. Archaeology:  Erm? prophetic accuracy: WTF!!?? statistical probabilities: Please! Show me your workings. -------------- "Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield "You magnificent bastard! " : Louis "ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard "I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932 "...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank Posts: 2560 Joined: Feb. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: June 27 2007,18:22    Remember, everyone, creationism is SCIENCE.  It has NOTHING ABOUT RELIGION in it.  No sirree Bob.  It's just them lying atheist darwinists (and those plagiarizing activist judges) who would think that creationism has anything at all whatsoever to do with, ya know, Biblical prophecy and all that. (snicker)  (giggle) And FTK wonders why nobody takes her seriously . . . . ? -------------- Editor, Red and Black Publishers www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

Pages: (25) < ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard