RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < ... 752 753 754 755 756 [757] 758 759 760 761 762 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,16:35   

I aske you because you posted this.  It occured to me that since you are always asking me question that are not related to my field of work, I thought I'd see how you do in that area.

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,16:35   

i need my edit button

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,16:40   

Quote (Ftk @ Dec. 03 2007,16:35)
I aske you because you posted this.  It occured to me that since you are always asking me question that are not related to my field of work, I thought I'd see how you do in that area.

Ah the difference is that I never claim to be an expert in a field I am not an expert in.  You, on the other hand, are always telling experts that they are wrong.  You see the difference, right?

Another difference, I'm actually going to answer your questions to the best of my ability.  You see the difference, right?

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
jupiter



Posts: 97
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,17:41   

Quote (Ftk @ Dec. 03 2007,16:20)
     
Quote (jupiter @ Dec. 03 2007,16:14)
     
Quote (Ftk @ Dec. 03 2007,15:24)
Crap...that should be who.

You suck, Steve.  I want my edit function back.

Your edit function was taken away because you abused it.

You're too sloppy and too frenetic to use the preview function.

You can't muster up an argument that's consistent from comment to comment.

Your flirty, flippy, party-girl persona is way past its expiration date.

Actually, hon, you suck.

Jupiter,

No doubt you are an incarnation of someone at KCFS.  I have a specific person in mind, but won't embarass you.  

Then again, I could be wrong.  Every once in a great while, my telepathy fails me.

You're wrong, as usual. Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?

Instead of bitching and moaning about the edit function you can't be trusted with, consider using the preview function to read over what you've written before you post it.

Once you've mastered that level of self-discipline (baby steps!), you might be capable of learning to read for comprehension—a skill you clearly lack. After that, who knows? At some point you might even work your way up to critical thinking and logical argumentation. We'll see.

Speaking of telepathy—didn't you once claim you could just tell when someone was feeding you BS? Even if you didn't know anything about the topic? And weren't you challenged on that claim, and didn't you go flouncing off in a snit?

Also, I'm curious—was Jesus a telepath? How does telepathy fit into your religious beliefs? How about astrology? UFOlogy? Where do you draw the line on metaphysical woo? Do you draw a line, or are you omni-credulous?

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,17:55   

Ooh, ooh, see there!...Jasper is making fun of Jesus.

DARWIN BEATS PUPPIES!  

:p  :p  :p

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,18:01   

Quote (Ftk @ Dec. 03 2007,23:55)
Ooh, ooh, see there!...Jasper is making fun of Jesus.

DARWIN BEATS PUPPIES!  

:p  :p  :p

FTK,

Do you even begin to see how and why this comment of yours misses the point?

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
JohnW



Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,18:06   

Quote (Ftk @ Dec. 03 2007,15:55)
Ooh, ooh, see there!...Jasper is making fun of Jesus.

DARWIN BEATS PUPPIES!  

:p  :p  :p

I assume your comment refers to this paragraph:
Quote
Also, I'm curious—was Jesus a telepath? How does telepathy fit into your religious beliefs? How about astrology? UFOlogy? Where do you draw the line on metaphysical woo? Do you draw a line, or are you omni-credulous?


How is this making fun of Jesus?  Jupiter is making fun of you.

--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers

There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"...  The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,18:12   

Quote (JohnW @ Dec. 04 2007,00:06)
Quote (Ftk @ Dec. 03 2007,15:55)
Ooh, ooh, see there!...Jasper is making fun of Jesus.

DARWIN BEATS PUPPIES!  

:p  :p  :p

I assume your comment refers to this paragraph:
Quote
Also, I'm curious—was Jesus a telepath? How does telepathy fit into your religious beliefs? How about astrology? UFOlogy? Where do you draw the line on metaphysical woo? Do you draw a line, or are you omni-credulous?


How is this making fun of Jesus?  Jupiter is making fun of you.

FTK thinks that because we say things she doesn't like that she is free to lie and obfuscate and generally behave like a total moron.

FTK hasn't worked out the difference between "mock", "lie" and "ask questions" yet. She thinks that if we "mock" or "ask questions" that because she doesn't like that she is free to do something we don't like which is "lie". She also doesn't understand that the reasons we don't like her lying are very different from the reasons that she doesn't like us mocking or asking questions. Hence all the false equations from FTK.

FTK's not too bright like that.

For FTK this is a team game, she sees us on opposite teams. What FTK doesn't understand is that, despite the occasional aptness of the combatative simile, that she is not on an opposing team to any of us. She, and all creationists, are simply playing a very different game. A game that has nothing to do with science.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,18:54   

FtK does more damage to ID than I could ever hope too. Keep it up, FtK.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,19:13   

Hey now easy on the hausfrau!!!

It may very well be that soccer moms lead the vanguard of the new scientific revolution.  It will not be televised.  It will not be published in any materialists journals.  It will not involve fancy words or big long equations.  It may even occur in a bathroom stall converted into a broom closet at Baylor.  However, it could also possibly occur at Montreat College or Johnson Bible College or Liberty University or any number of these fine research schools in this great land that was not built by materialists.  All that is necessary to complete the paradigm shift is to finish building the ark.

All Science So Far, sugarlips!

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,19:18   

Quote (Ftk @ Dec. 03 2007,16:24)
You suck, Steve.  I want my edit function back.


Steve is not responsible for that, your anger is misplaced.

Quote (Ftk @ Dec. 03 2007,17:35)
i need my edit button


Not bloody likely.

------------------------------

Now if this is going to devolve into discussion of Ftk and her wackiness, let's move that conversation to the appropriate thread, if you please.

Let's get this thread back on the topic of The Tards Across The Way O'er Yonder.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
jupiter



Posts: 97
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,19:25   

Quote (Ftk @ Dec. 03 2007,17:55)
Ooh, ooh, see there!...Jasper is making fun of Jesus.

DARWIN BEATS PUPPIES!  

:p  :p  :p

Sweetpea, I am not "Jasper." I've never visited, much less posted on, KCFS.  I guess that's the limit of your "telepathy," recognizing that—whoa!—"Jasper" looks kinda like "jupiter"!!!!!!!

You're a middle-aged housewife who pissed away her college education. You wish you had some influence in the outside world, but you're not willing to do any of the hard work required to acquire legitimate knowledge and authority.

Remember those "Draw Binky!" ads at the back of comic books? The ones that promised "You might be an artist! Take this test!" Everyone who took the test qualified, and was strung along for as long as the "art lessons" were paid for. You've bought into "Draw Binky-Jesus!" That's why you squander your spare time making ill-informed arguments about issues you know next-to-nothing about.

Here's my question again, in terms you might understand: Did you buy into "Draw Binky-Astrology" too? How about "Binky-UFO"?

Oh, another question you didn't answer: Can you tell when someone's feeding you BS, even if you don't know anything about the subject? If so, how?

ETA: Sorry, Lou! Please move this to the designated thread, if you like.

  
Jasper



Posts: 76
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,19:29   

Quote (Ftk @ Dec. 03 2007,18:55)
Ooh, ooh, see there!...Jasper is making fun of Jesus.

DARWIN BEATS PUPPIES!  

:p  :p  :p

That wasn't me.  Leave me out of this, please.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,19:33   

Do we have a design inference?

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,19:59   

Oh Denyse!

She's so excited:

http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....ez-case

Comments are sadly lacking. Uders must to TOO excited.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,20:11   

Y'know, I'm thinking if all the sockpuppets pulled up out of that nuthouse, there wouldn't be much left other than the crew.

Seriously, who'd be left?

Batshit77
Ftk,
Larry Falafalman

Anyone else?

Well on the bright side, I guess that's still more than that wacky zany teeny bopping OE.

(Edited for no other reason than because I can.)

Edited by Lou FCD on Dec. 03 2007,21:11

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,20:16   

Quote (blipey @ Dec. 03 2007,16:31)
   
Quote (Ftk @ Dec. 03 2007,16:17)
Blipes, they were in my post above:

1.  Precisely which pilum and which type-three secretory system [did Klebba] he have in mind?

2.  How exactly did a pilum shed its hair-like filament in becoming a type-three secretory system (last I looked, type-three secretory systems are microsyringes that do not have hair-like filaments)?

3.  What new genes need to be added to form a type-three secretory system from a pilum?

4.  What old genes need to be lost to form a type-three secretory system from a pilum?

5.  In the evolution from the pilum to the type-three secretory system, how many intermediate systems whose functions were neither that of a pilum nor that of a type-three secretory system were there?

I said I'd answer these questions and I will.  I find it interesting that these are the particular questions you want me to answer, however. I am an actor, having let me think about it--3 hours of undergrad biology.  Strange that you won't ask these questions of others, you know the actual biologists.  I find it difficult to believe (but could be convinced otherwise) that you have any idea what these questions mean.

I'm going to have to do a little research into even the terminology of the questions.  I will, however, try to answer your questions.

It might be easier if she had the terminology correct. I hate to go all Robert O'Brien on you here, but it could make it easier for you to find answers.

Pilus - singular. From Wikipedia - "A pilus (Latin for 'hair'; plural : pili) is a hairlike appendage found on the surface of many bacteria. The terms pilus and fimbria (Latin for 'thread' or 'fiber'; plural: fimbriae) are often used interchangeably, although some researchers reserve the term pilus for the sexual appendage required for bacterial conjugation. All pili are primarily composed of oligomeric pilin proteins."

Pilum - (also from Wikipedia) - "The pilum (plural pila) was a heavy javelin commonly used by the Roman army in ancient times. It was generally about two meters long overall, consisting of an iron shank about 7 mm in diameter and 60 cm long with pyramidal head. The iron shank may be socketed or more usually widens to a flat tang, this was secured to a wooden shaft. A pilum usually weighed between two and four kilograms, with the versions produced during the Empire being a bit lighter. Pictorial evidence suggest that some versions of the weapon were weighted by a lead ball to increase penetrative power, but no archeological specimens have been found.[1] Recent experiments have shown pila to have a range of 98 feet (approximately 30 m), although effective range of about half to two thirds."

The pilum sounds pretty kinky, but seems irrelevant to the discussion of the evolution of the bacterial flagella...

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
Doc Bill



Posts: 1039
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,20:26   

On the O'Leary thread someone named Maya makes the following statement:


Quote
You may be being misled by part of the summary above. Ms. O’Leary wrote:

“Contrary to his public statements, and those of ISU President Gregory Geoffroy, the chairman of ISU’s Department of Physics and Astronomy, Dr. Eli Rosenberg, stated in Dr. Gonzalez’s tenure dossier that Dr. Gonzalez’s support for intelligent design ‘disqualifies him from serving as a science educator.’”

The full context of that quotation is:

“on numerous occasions, Dr. Gonzalez has stated that Intelligent Design is a scientific theory and someday would be taught in science classrooms. This is confirmed by his numerous postings on the Discovery Institute Web site. The problem here is that Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory. Its premise is beyond the realm of science. … But it is incumbent on a science educator to clearly understand and be able to articulate what science is and what it is not. The fact that Dr. Gonzalez does not understand what constitutes both science and a scientific theory disqualifies him from serving as a science educator.”

The concern is not about Gonzalez’s politics or religion but about his ability to serve as a science educator.


Good grief!  Attacking the O'Leary?  Where is the Banninator?

  
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,20:31   

Quote (Ftk @ Dec. 03 2007,16:17)
Blipes, they were in my post above:

1.  Precisely which pilum and which type-three secretory system [did Klebba] he have in mind?

2.  How exactly did a pilum shed its hair-like filament in becoming a type-three secretory system (last I looked, type-three secretory systems are microsyringes that do not have hair-like filaments)?

3.  What new genes need to be added to form a type-three secretory system from a pilum?

4.  What old genes need to be lost to form a type-three secretory system from a pilum?

5.  In the evolution from the pilum to the type-three secretory system, how many intermediate systems whose functions were neither that of a pilum nor that of a type-three secretory system were there?

If these are Dembski's questions, he needs to take a biology course, or perhaps test-drive his ignorance past the "molecular biologist colleague" he quotes in his post.  
Quote
Precisely which pilum and which type-three secretory system does he have in mind? How exactly did a pilum shed its hair-like filament in becoming a type-three secretory system (last I looked, type-three secretory systems are microsyringes that do not have hair-like filaments)? What new genes need to be added to form a type-three secretory system from a pilum? What old genes need to be lost to form a type-three secretory system from a pilum? In the evolution from the pilum to the type-three secretory system, how many intermediate systems whose functions were neither that of a pilum nor that of a type-three secretory system were there? Klebba and his colleagues never answer such questions.


The word is PILUS. The plural is PILI.

The king of the tards reveals his deep ignorance of even the terminology of biology once again.

How long will it take before he edits his post on UD in the hopes that it will mask his ignorance? I'm betting less than 24 hours, starting now.

The wanker should stick with theology.

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
JonF



Posts: 634
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,20:54   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Dec. 03 2007,00:30)
Didn't sternberg fix his review panel or something?

No, that was the guy at Ohio State. I forget his name.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,22:10   

Quote (JonF @ Dec. 03 2007,20:54)
Quote (Richardthughes @ Dec. 03 2007,00:30)
Didn't sternberg fix his review panel or something?

No, that was the guy at Ohio State. I forget his name.

S.....


St.......



Story?

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,22:23   

LOL

   
Wesley R. Elsberry



Posts: 4991
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,22:35   

I guess it remains to be seen whether Bryan Leonard at OSU will be a surprise guest star in "Expelled". I can see them playing that a couple of different ways. In one, the makeup of his committee could be entirely unmentioned. In the other, they could note that the oppressive Darwinians made an issue out of some technicality about his committee without going into the specifics about how he didn't have anybody from the specialization he was supposed to be getting his degree in. And certainly I expect them to ignore entirely the stuff about getting his treatment protocol approved for human subjects.

--------------
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

    
Annyday



Posts: 583
Joined: Nov. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,22:39   

Denyse makes me want to beat up puppies, she's so stupid.

Are they gonna release the full emails? ARE THEY? That would be interesting to me, I'm a raw data kind of guy. Right now all the people on the ID side are just parroting and exaggerating each other's press releases.

Hell, are they even going to file suit, or are they just quote mining and making a fuss for the publicity?

And do they realize that intolerance to a scientific view is a contradiction of terms?

AGH. BRAIN.

--------------
"ALL eight of the "nature" miracles of Jesus could have been accomplished via the electroweak quantum tunneling mechanism. For example, walking on water could be accomplished by directing a neutrino beam created just below Jesus' feet downward." - Frank Tipler, ISCID fellow

  
ERV



Posts: 329
Joined: Sep. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,22:41   

Quote (Albatrossity2 @ Dec. 03 2007,20:31)

The word is PILUS. The plural is PILI.

The king of the tards reveals his deep ignorance of even the terminology of biology once again.

I dont understand... why didnt Dembski refer his readers to the video of the Q&A for them to see the explanation from Klebba himself?

I dont understand...

  
Art



Posts: 69
Joined: Dec. 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,22:42   

Quote (Ftk @ Dec. 03 2007,16:17)
Blipes, they were in my post above:

1.  Precisely which pilum and which type-three secretory system [did Klebba] he have in mind?

2.  How exactly did a pilum shed its hair-like filament in becoming a type-three secretory system (last I looked, type-three secretory systems are microsyringes that do not have hair-like filaments)?

3.  What new genes need to be added to form a type-three secretory system from a pilum?

4.  What old genes need to be lost to form a type-three secretory system from a pilum?

5.  In the evolution from the pilum to the type-three secretory system, how many intermediate systems whose functions were neither that of a pilum nor that of a type-three secretory system were there?

Quote
2.  How exactly did a pilum shed its hair-like filament in becoming a type-three secretory system (last I looked, type-three secretory systems are microsyringes that do not have hair-like filaments)?


Look again.  The pilus and the "microsyringe" and but different manifestations of the same thing.  Both are protrusions extending out from the cell.  One is capped, one contacts and penetrates a neighboring cell.

This particular comment of Dembski's makes him look tres ignorant.

Quote
What new genes need to be added to form a type-three secretory system from a pilum?


Um, none.

Classical molecular microevolution.  (Which, when it refutes IC, is NOT accepted by IDists.  Apparently.)

   
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 03 2007,23:57   

Quote (Annyday @ Dec. 03 2007,23:39)
Denyse makes me want to beat up puppies, she's so stupid.

Are they gonna release the full emails? ARE THEY? That would be interesting to me, I'm a raw data kind of guy. Right now all the people on the ID side are just parroting and exaggerating each other's press releases.

Hell, are they even going to file suit, or are they just quote mining and making a fuss for the publicity?

And do they realize that intolerance to a scientific view is a contradiction of terms?

AGH. BRAIN.

I got home, answered some emails and some text messages, and checked this website. I visited FTK's thread, and her desperate claims that Dembski did nothing wrong, when he obviously did, started to elevate my blood pressure. So I left that thread and fell back on my beloved UD thread, only to discover that she was mucking around here too.

So I put in Transformers.

Entertaining movie. Always loved Optimus Prime's voice. I've got a radio-quality voice, and I did radio, when I lived in Florida, but I was average. That guy's world-class. He's not Don LaFontaine, but he's close.

   
Bob O'H



Posts: 2564
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 04 2007,00:38   

Quote (Art @ Dec. 03 2007,22:42)
Quote
What new genes need to be added to form a type-three secretory system from a pilum?


Um, none.

Classical molecular microevolution.  (Which, when it refutes IC, is NOT accepted by IDists.  Apparently.)

What, you mean the Romans had syringes at the end of those things?

Egads, they were even more advanced than I thought.

Oh, wait a moment.  Pila being placed in bacteria to form Type III secretory systems?  I think we've found our intelligent designer, folks.

--------------
It is fun to dip into the various threads to watch cluelessness at work in the hands of the confident exponent. - Soapy Sam (so say we all)

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 04 2007,01:33   

Quote (stevestory @ Dec. 03 2007,23:57)
I've got a radio-quality voice, ...

Arden's got a radio quality face!   :D

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 04 2007,01:36   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Dec. 04 2007,02:33)
Quote (stevestory @ Dec. 03 2007,23:57)
I've got a radio-quality voice, ...

Arden's got a radio quality face!   :D

LOL.

   
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < ... 752 753 754 755 756 [757] 758 759 760 761 762 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]