RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (919) < ... 300 301 302 303 304 [305] 306 307 308 309 310 ... >   
  Topic: Joe G.'s Tardgasm, How long can it last?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,07:07   

Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,14:25)
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 22 2015,21:06)
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 22 2015,20:48)
Design is not a mechanism. Design purpose, planning, or intention that exists or is thought to exist behind an action, fact, or material object.

Actually constructing that object, building that object, modifying that object requires PHYSICAL efforts, tools, materials... even if they are genetic and/or molecular.

WHERE DID THAT COME FROM? According to ID.

That's the thing you idiots don't get. Design is meaningless without a system to accomplish the design. Design is not the end of the process, it's beginning.

I've designed hundreds of spaceships, but not a one has been built. I've designed organisms, hell, I've even designed an alternate biochemistry for energy transfer between plant analogues and animal analogues using ketones as the rough equivalent of ATP.

Doesn't mean that I can BUILD it.

So you morons need to fucking man up and admit you don't have a fucking clue about the mechanisms that are used to build the design.

IF you wimp out like the chichenshit we all know that you are, then you will say that genetics is the tool kit... in which case, you have just admitted that everything that science says is true. Further, that means that the only difference between what you wish was true and what is actually true is the actual designer itself.

So, you either have to produce the designer or show how a bacterium can purposefully modify it's own genetic code to make itself better... and include a lengthy discussion of why only some bacteria are smart enough to do this.

But we all know that you can't do that. You're going to run away from this discussion, just like you've run away from every other discussion you've ever had about this.

Here's a hint, yelling at us, calling us stupid, cursing, trying to turn this discussion back on us, saying we don't understand the issues....

that's all pathetic attempts to divert attention away from the one true thing we've know about you for over 5 years. You don't have a clue.

You couldn't get a clue if you were naked in a field of horny clues, drenched in clue musk and doing the clue mating dance.

You can't even begin to describe a mechanism for ID that is in any way different than that of evolution. You can't begin to describe the limit of evolution, because you really don't know what it is.

So, feel free to explain how the ID position describes the tools and construction of organisms from the designer's plans. We're all waiting. Most of us have been waiting for almost two decades and, if you and the rest of the morons in the ID camp are any indication, we will go on waiting.

You know what, even if ID were correct. Even if there was a real designer. Even if every living thing on the planet was purposefully designed, frontloaded with all the information to change over time and had perfect knowledge of the future of the entire Earth biosphere... it would NOT be you clowns who would find out about it... because you are all pathetic morons.

That was fun. Let's do this again in 4-5 years and I'm willing to bet large sums of money that ID will only continue to decline... not that you would admit it.

Chubs is a YEC.  He knows GAWD spoke the living creature designs ("kinds") into existence just like GAWD spoke the universe and Privileged Planet into existence.  ID supports baraminology, don't forget.

Of course Chubs can't ever admit to any of that because then the whole charade is blown, as if no one in science ever saw through ID's "it's not about the Designer!" transparent bullshit.   :D

Actually every biological experiment ever conducted supports baraminology. Lenski's experiment does.

ID is about the DESIGN and always has been. Again your childish ignorance, while amusing, means nothing.

But anyway I wouldn't expect a child-molesting, syphilis-riddled coward like Timmy Horton to understand.

What ? Do you mean the Dover school board are owed $1,000,011 in legal fees they paid out because you useless fucks are right?

Put your money where your foot is Joe. Go and see if Dover wants to have  second try.

Loser.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,07:13   

Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,07:07)
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,14:25)
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 22 2015,21:06)
 
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 22 2015,20:48)
Design is not a mechanism. Design purpose, planning, or intention that exists or is thought to exist behind an action, fact, or material object.

Actually constructing that object, building that object, modifying that object requires PHYSICAL efforts, tools, materials... even if they are genetic and/or molecular.

WHERE DID THAT COME FROM? According to ID.

That's the thing you idiots don't get. Design is meaningless without a system to accomplish the design. Design is not the end of the process, it's beginning.

I've designed hundreds of spaceships, but not a one has been built. I've designed organisms, hell, I've even designed an alternate biochemistry for energy transfer between plant analogues and animal analogues using ketones as the rough equivalent of ATP.

Doesn't mean that I can BUILD it.

So you morons need to fucking man up and admit you don't have a fucking clue about the mechanisms that are used to build the design.

IF you wimp out like the chichenshit we all know that you are, then you will say that genetics is the tool kit... in which case, you have just admitted that everything that science says is true. Further, that means that the only difference between what you wish was true and what is actually true is the actual designer itself.

So, you either have to produce the designer or show how a bacterium can purposefully modify it's own genetic code to make itself better... and include a lengthy discussion of why only some bacteria are smart enough to do this.

But we all know that you can't do that. You're going to run away from this discussion, just like you've run away from every other discussion you've ever had about this.

Here's a hint, yelling at us, calling us stupid, cursing, trying to turn this discussion back on us, saying we don't understand the issues....

that's all pathetic attempts to divert attention away from the one true thing we've know about you for over 5 years. You don't have a clue.

You couldn't get a clue if you were naked in a field of horny clues, drenched in clue musk and doing the clue mating dance.

You can't even begin to describe a mechanism for ID that is in any way different than that of evolution. You can't begin to describe the limit of evolution, because you really don't know what it is.

So, feel free to explain how the ID position describes the tools and construction of organisms from the designer's plans. We're all waiting. Most of us have been waiting for almost two decades and, if you and the rest of the morons in the ID camp are any indication, we will go on waiting.

You know what, even if ID were correct. Even if there was a real designer. Even if every living thing on the planet was purposefully designed, frontloaded with all the information to change over time and had perfect knowledge of the future of the entire Earth biosphere... it would NOT be you clowns who would find out about it... because you are all pathetic morons.

That was fun. Let's do this again in 4-5 years and I'm willing to bet large sums of money that ID will only continue to decline... not that you would admit it.

Chubs is a YEC.  He knows GAWD spoke the living creature designs ("kinds") into existence just like GAWD spoke the universe and Privileged Planet into existence.  ID supports baraminology, don't forget.

Of course Chubs can't ever admit to any of that because then the whole charade is blown, as if no one in science ever saw through ID's "it's not about the Designer!" transparent bullshit.   :D

Actually every biological experiment ever conducted supports baraminology. Lenski's experiment does.

ID is about the DESIGN and always has been. Again your childish ignorance, while amusing, means nothing.

But anyway I wouldn't expect a child-molesting, syphilis-riddled coward like Timmy Horton to understand.

What ? Do you mean the Dover school board are owed $1,000,011 in legal fees they paid out because you useless fucks are right?

Put your money where your foot is Joe. Go and see if Dover wants to have  second try.

Loser.

You are the useless fucks, Davey. You are the liars and cry-babies.

I don't need Dover. I have a kid I will be standing up for right here. They teach evolutionism in social studies here. For science they teach about measurements and quantification. So if they ever get around to having evolutionism presented in a science class the glaring contradiction should send their little heads spinning. My kid and her friends will be prepared.

Asswipe

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,07:22   

Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,15:13)
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,07:07)
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,14:25)
 
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 22 2015,21:06)
 
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 22 2015,20:48)
Design is not a mechanism. Design purpose, planning, or intention that exists or is thought to exist behind an action, fact, or material object.

Actually constructing that object, building that object, modifying that object requires PHYSICAL efforts, tools, materials... even if they are genetic and/or molecular.

WHERE DID THAT COME FROM? According to ID.

That's the thing you idiots don't get. Design is meaningless without a system to accomplish the design. Design is not the end of the process, it's beginning.

I've designed hundreds of spaceships, but not a one has been built. I've designed organisms, hell, I've even designed an alternate biochemistry for energy transfer between plant analogues and animal analogues using ketones as the rough equivalent of ATP.

Doesn't mean that I can BUILD it.

So you morons need to fucking man up and admit you don't have a fucking clue about the mechanisms that are used to build the design.

IF you wimp out like the chichenshit we all know that you are, then you will say that genetics is the tool kit... in which case, you have just admitted that everything that science says is true. Further, that means that the only difference between what you wish was true and what is actually true is the actual designer itself.

So, you either have to produce the designer or show how a bacterium can purposefully modify it's own genetic code to make itself better... and include a lengthy discussion of why only some bacteria are smart enough to do this.

But we all know that you can't do that. You're going to run away from this discussion, just like you've run away from every other discussion you've ever had about this.

Here's a hint, yelling at us, calling us stupid, cursing, trying to turn this discussion back on us, saying we don't understand the issues....

that's all pathetic attempts to divert attention away from the one true thing we've know about you for over 5 years. You don't have a clue.

You couldn't get a clue if you were naked in a field of horny clues, drenched in clue musk and doing the clue mating dance.

You can't even begin to describe a mechanism for ID that is in any way different than that of evolution. You can't begin to describe the limit of evolution, because you really don't know what it is.

So, feel free to explain how the ID position describes the tools and construction of organisms from the designer's plans. We're all waiting. Most of us have been waiting for almost two decades and, if you and the rest of the morons in the ID camp are any indication, we will go on waiting.

You know what, even if ID were correct. Even if there was a real designer. Even if every living thing on the planet was purposefully designed, frontloaded with all the information to change over time and had perfect knowledge of the future of the entire Earth biosphere... it would NOT be you clowns who would find out about it... because you are all pathetic morons.

That was fun. Let's do this again in 4-5 years and I'm willing to bet large sums of money that ID will only continue to decline... not that you would admit it.

Chubs is a YEC.  He knows GAWD spoke the living creature designs ("kinds") into existence just like GAWD spoke the universe and Privileged Planet into existence.  ID supports baraminology, don't forget.

Of course Chubs can't ever admit to any of that because then the whole charade is blown, as if no one in science ever saw through ID's "it's not about the Designer!" transparent bullshit.   :D

Actually every biological experiment ever conducted supports baraminology. Lenski's experiment does.

ID is about the DESIGN and always has been. Again your childish ignorance, while amusing, means nothing.

But anyway I wouldn't expect a child-molesting, syphilis-riddled coward like Timmy Horton to understand.

What ? Do you mean the Dover school board are owed $1,000,011 in legal fees they paid out because you useless fucks are right?

Put your money where your foot is Joe. Go and see if Dover wants to have  second try.

Loser.

You are the useless fucks, Davey. You are the liars and cry-babies.

I don't need Dover. I have a kid I will be standing up for right here. They teach evolutionism in social studies here. For science they teach about measurements and quantification. So if they ever get around to having evolutionism presented in a science class the glaring contradiction should send their little heads spinning. My kid and her friends will be prepared.

Asswipe

Have you been on the Hajj to Mecca Joe? And if not why not?

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,07:31   

Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,07:22)
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,15:13)
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,07:07)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,14:25)
 
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 22 2015,21:06)
   
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 22 2015,20:48)
Design is not a mechanism. Design purpose, planning, or intention that exists or is thought to exist behind an action, fact, or material object.

Actually constructing that object, building that object, modifying that object requires PHYSICAL efforts, tools, materials... even if they are genetic and/or molecular.

WHERE DID THAT COME FROM? According to ID.

That's the thing you idiots don't get. Design is meaningless without a system to accomplish the design. Design is not the end of the process, it's beginning.

I've designed hundreds of spaceships, but not a one has been built. I've designed organisms, hell, I've even designed an alternate biochemistry for energy transfer between plant analogues and animal analogues using ketones as the rough equivalent of ATP.

Doesn't mean that I can BUILD it.

So you morons need to fucking man up and admit you don't have a fucking clue about the mechanisms that are used to build the design.

IF you wimp out like the chichenshit we all know that you are, then you will say that genetics is the tool kit... in which case, you have just admitted that everything that science says is true. Further, that means that the only difference between what you wish was true and what is actually true is the actual designer itself.

So, you either have to produce the designer or show how a bacterium can purposefully modify it's own genetic code to make itself better... and include a lengthy discussion of why only some bacteria are smart enough to do this.

But we all know that you can't do that. You're going to run away from this discussion, just like you've run away from every other discussion you've ever had about this.

Here's a hint, yelling at us, calling us stupid, cursing, trying to turn this discussion back on us, saying we don't understand the issues....

that's all pathetic attempts to divert attention away from the one true thing we've know about you for over 5 years. You don't have a clue.

You couldn't get a clue if you were naked in a field of horny clues, drenched in clue musk and doing the clue mating dance.

You can't even begin to describe a mechanism for ID that is in any way different than that of evolution. You can't begin to describe the limit of evolution, because you really don't know what it is.

So, feel free to explain how the ID position describes the tools and construction of organisms from the designer's plans. We're all waiting. Most of us have been waiting for almost two decades and, if you and the rest of the morons in the ID camp are any indication, we will go on waiting.

You know what, even if ID were correct. Even if there was a real designer. Even if every living thing on the planet was purposefully designed, frontloaded with all the information to change over time and had perfect knowledge of the future of the entire Earth biosphere... it would NOT be you clowns who would find out about it... because you are all pathetic morons.

That was fun. Let's do this again in 4-5 years and I'm willing to bet large sums of money that ID will only continue to decline... not that you would admit it.

Chubs is a YEC.  He knows GAWD spoke the living creature designs ("kinds") into existence just like GAWD spoke the universe and Privileged Planet into existence.  ID supports baraminology, don't forget.

Of course Chubs can't ever admit to any of that because then the whole charade is blown, as if no one in science ever saw through ID's "it's not about the Designer!" transparent bullshit.   :D

Actually every biological experiment ever conducted supports baraminology. Lenski's experiment does.

ID is about the DESIGN and always has been. Again your childish ignorance, while amusing, means nothing.

But anyway I wouldn't expect a child-molesting, syphilis-riddled coward like Timmy Horton to understand.

What ? Do you mean the Dover school board are owed $1,000,011 in legal fees they paid out because you useless fucks are right?

Put your money where your foot is Joe. Go and see if Dover wants to have  second try.

Loser.

You are the useless fucks, Davey. You are the liars and cry-babies.

I don't need Dover. I have a kid I will be standing up for right here. They teach evolutionism in social studies here. For science they teach about measurements and quantification. So if they ever get around to having evolutionism presented in a science class the glaring contradiction should send their little heads spinning. My kid and her friends will be prepared.

Asswipe

Have you been on the Hajj to Mecca Joe? And if not why not?

Why would I? I have never been a follower of Islam and only followers of Islam do that.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,07:57   

Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,15:31)
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,07:22)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,15:13)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,07:07)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,14:25)
   
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 22 2015,21:06)
     
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 22 2015,20:48)
Design is not a mechanism. Design purpose, planning, or intention that exists or is thought to exist behind an action, fact, or material object.

Actually constructing that object, building that object, modifying that object requires PHYSICAL efforts, tools, materials... even if they are genetic and/or molecular.

WHERE DID THAT COME FROM? According to ID.

That's the thing you idiots don't get. Design is meaningless without a system to accomplish the design. Design is not the end of the process, it's beginning.

I've designed hundreds of spaceships, but not a one has been built. I've designed organisms, hell, I've even designed an alternate biochemistry for energy transfer between plant analogues and animal analogues using ketones as the rough equivalent of ATP.

Doesn't mean that I can BUILD it.

So you morons need to fucking man up and admit you don't have a fucking clue about the mechanisms that are used to build the design.

IF you wimp out like the chichenshit we all know that you are, then you will say that genetics is the tool kit... in which case, you have just admitted that everything that science says is true. Further, that means that the only difference between what you wish was true and what is actually true is the actual designer itself.

So, you either have to produce the designer or show how a bacterium can purposefully modify it's own genetic code to make itself better... and include a lengthy discussion of why only some bacteria are smart enough to do this.

But we all know that you can't do that. You're going to run away from this discussion, just like you've run away from every other discussion you've ever had about this.

Here's a hint, yelling at us, calling us stupid, cursing, trying to turn this discussion back on us, saying we don't understand the issues....

that's all pathetic attempts to divert attention away from the one true thing we've know about you for over 5 years. You don't have a clue.

You couldn't get a clue if you were naked in a field of horny clues, drenched in clue musk and doing the clue mating dance.

You can't even begin to describe a mechanism for ID that is in any way different than that of evolution. You can't begin to describe the limit of evolution, because you really don't know what it is.

So, feel free to explain how the ID position describes the tools and construction of organisms from the designer's plans. We're all waiting. Most of us have been waiting for almost two decades and, if you and the rest of the morons in the ID camp are any indication, we will go on waiting.

You know what, even if ID were correct. Even if there was a real designer. Even if every living thing on the planet was purposefully designed, frontloaded with all the information to change over time and had perfect knowledge of the future of the entire Earth biosphere... it would NOT be you clowns who would find out about it... because you are all pathetic morons.

That was fun. Let's do this again in 4-5 years and I'm willing to bet large sums of money that ID will only continue to decline... not that you would admit it.

Chubs is a YEC.  He knows GAWD spoke the living creature designs ("kinds") into existence just like GAWD spoke the universe and Privileged Planet into existence.  ID supports baraminology, don't forget.

Of course Chubs can't ever admit to any of that because then the whole charade is blown, as if no one in science ever saw through ID's "it's not about the Designer!" transparent bullshit.   :D

Actually every biological experiment ever conducted supports baraminology. Lenski's experiment does.

ID is about the DESIGN and always has been. Again your childish ignorance, while amusing, means nothing.

But anyway I wouldn't expect a child-molesting, syphilis-riddled coward like Timmy Horton to understand.

What ? Do you mean the Dover school board are owed $1,000,011 in legal fees they paid out because you useless fucks are right?

Put your money where your foot is Joe. Go and see if Dover wants to have  second try.

Loser.

You are the useless fucks, Davey. You are the liars and cry-babies.

I don't need Dover. I have a kid I will be standing up for right here. They teach evolutionism in social studies here. For science they teach about measurements and quantification. So if they ever get around to having evolutionism presented in a science class the glaring contradiction should send their little heads spinning. My kid and her friends will be prepared.

Asswipe

Have you been on the Hajj to Mecca Joe? And if not why not?

Why would I? I have never been a follower of Islam and only followers of Islam do that.

So why did you claim to be a Muslim?

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
JonF



Posts: 634
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,08:07   

Quote (Joe G @ June 22 2015,16:24)
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 22 2015,15:08)
Quote (Woodbine @ June 22 2015,15:05)
Hey, Joe....I've just checked in with the guys at the lab and you should see the size of the number they've found....it's massive!

Today Chubs also announced that you can't have a probability be zero.  But compared to his other stupidity that's nothing...  ;)

I said zero equals an impossibility. Richie already posted a reference that says a probability is between zero and one. Is zero between zero and one?

Depends, did he mean "between zero and one inclusive" or "between zero and one exclusive"?

Hint: the former.

Mathematicians recognize both closed and open intervals. Duh.

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,08:10   

Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,06:25)
Actually every biological experiment ever conducted supports baraminology. Lenski's experiment does.

ID is about the DESIGN and always has been. Again your childish ignorance, while amusing, means nothing.

LOL!  Chubs sticks his fat foot in his mouth again.

One post you tell us life was "designed to evolve" from the first eukaryote by using external environmental clues.

Next post you say all animals were Biblically created "kinds" as described by baraminology.

Make up your teeny suet-choked YEC mind, will ya Chubs?

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."

- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,08:33   

Quote (Joe G @ June 22 2015,20:25)
Quote (Texas Teach @ June 22 2015,17:41)
Quote (Joe G @ June 22 2015,15:23)
 
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 22 2015,14:57)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 22 2015,11:14)
   
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 21 2015,19:08)
   
Quote (Richardthughes @ June 20 2015,09:52)
     
Quote
6
Virgil Cain
June 20, 2015 at 6:49 am
It looks like the E coli engineered themselves to accompany the new gene. James Shapiro and Lee Spetner must be smiling.


Chubs lets the designer out of the bag: E Coli.

As usual, chubs says whatever he thinks will get himself out of his current losing argument without considering the ramifications.

Well, then who (or what) designed E. coli?

The evolutionary relationships between the two bacteria Escherichia coli and Haemophilus influenzae and their putative last common ancestor

Published in 1998. Surely, someone as well read as Joey would know about that one. Oh yeah, I forgot, he has a reading problem. Poor guy.

Well, Kevin, you don't have a mechanism capable of producing a living organism, so you lose, again. Bacteria evolving into bacteria doesn't help you.

Also there wasn't any losing argument and you don't know anything about ramifications. If you did then you would understand the ramifications of evolutionism.

So please provide the detailed mechanisms of how E. coli designed itself new traits.

With peer-reviewed references to said mechanisms.

Sufficient to show that you really are following the actual science, not just what you wish was true.

Kevin, your position is void of details you imbecile. If you had something then ID would be a non-starter. But you have nothing but whining. It suits you.

Joe finally got something right.  ID is a non-starter.

And yet ID has started and you have nothing to stop it.

With its biggest proponents being a BBB D- rated lawyer, a philosopher, a paranoid engineer from Monserrat and a toaster repairman, I don't think that we have to worry about it being taken seriously by anyone.

  
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,08:48   

Joey:
Quote
AGAIN, we do NOT need to know where the materials came from before we can determine if intelligent design exists. We do NOT need to know how the design was implemented before we can determine that intelligent design exists. All of that comes AFTER you ignorant ass.


Finally, Joey admits that nobody has identified design in biological systems. Or have I missed all of that research into the mechanisms of ID that come AFTER determining that Intelligent Design exists. If I have, please point me to a few peer-reviewed papers on the subject.

  
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,09:18   

(shrug)

Okay, Joe. You're right, we're wrong. There's a designer. CSI/dFDIWLEN/whatever proves it.

Now what?

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,09:31   

Quote (fnxtr @ June 23 2015,17:18)
(shrug)

Okay, Joe. You're right, we're wrong. There's a designer. CSI/dFDIWLEN/whatever proves it.

Now what?

Well now you claim frequency = wavelength
probability of zero is non existant (snikker)
The designer is Allah
ticks are vegetarian
Call everyone a homo HOMO!!

THAT'S WHAT!

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,10:01   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ June 23 2015,08:48)
Joey:  
Quote
AGAIN, we do NOT need to know where the materials came from before we can determine if intelligent design exists. We do NOT need to know how the design was implemented before we can determine that intelligent design exists. All of that comes AFTER you ignorant ass.


Finally, Joey admits that nobody has identified design in biological systems. Or have I missed all of that research into the mechanisms of ID that come AFTER determining that Intelligent Design exists. If I have, please point me to a few peer-reviewed papers on the subject.

We have identified design in biology, moron.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,10:03   

Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,07:57)
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,15:31)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,07:22)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,15:13)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,07:07)
   
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,14:25)
     
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 22 2015,21:06)
     
Quote (OgreMkV @ June 22 2015,20:48)
Design is not a mechanism. Design purpose, planning, or intention that exists or is thought to exist behind an action, fact, or material object.

Actually constructing that object, building that object, modifying that object requires PHYSICAL efforts, tools, materials... even if they are genetic and/or molecular.

WHERE DID THAT COME FROM? According to ID.

That's the thing you idiots don't get. Design is meaningless without a system to accomplish the design. Design is not the end of the process, it's beginning.

I've designed hundreds of spaceships, but not a one has been built. I've designed organisms, hell, I've even designed an alternate biochemistry for energy transfer between plant analogues and animal analogues using ketones as the rough equivalent of ATP.

Doesn't mean that I can BUILD it.

So you morons need to fucking man up and admit you don't have a fucking clue about the mechanisms that are used to build the design.

IF you wimp out like the chichenshit we all know that you are, then you will say that genetics is the tool kit... in which case, you have just admitted that everything that science says is true. Further, that means that the only difference between what you wish was true and what is actually true is the actual designer itself.

So, you either have to produce the designer or show how a bacterium can purposefully modify it's own genetic code to make itself better... and include a lengthy discussion of why only some bacteria are smart enough to do this.

But we all know that you can't do that. You're going to run away from this discussion, just like you've run away from every other discussion you've ever had about this.

Here's a hint, yelling at us, calling us stupid, cursing, trying to turn this discussion back on us, saying we don't understand the issues....

that's all pathetic attempts to divert attention away from the one true thing we've know about you for over 5 years. You don't have a clue.

You couldn't get a clue if you were naked in a field of horny clues, drenched in clue musk and doing the clue mating dance.

You can't even begin to describe a mechanism for ID that is in any way different than that of evolution. You can't begin to describe the limit of evolution, because you really don't know what it is.

So, feel free to explain how the ID position describes the tools and construction of organisms from the designer's plans. We're all waiting. Most of us have been waiting for almost two decades and, if you and the rest of the morons in the ID camp are any indication, we will go on waiting.

You know what, even if ID were correct. Even if there was a real designer. Even if every living thing on the planet was purposefully designed, frontloaded with all the information to change over time and had perfect knowledge of the future of the entire Earth biosphere... it would NOT be you clowns who would find out about it... because you are all pathetic morons.

That was fun. Let's do this again in 4-5 years and I'm willing to bet large sums of money that ID will only continue to decline... not that you would admit it.

Chubs is a YEC.  He knows GAWD spoke the living creature designs ("kinds") into existence just like GAWD spoke the universe and Privileged Planet into existence.  ID supports baraminology, don't forget.

Of course Chubs can't ever admit to any of that because then the whole charade is blown, as if no one in science ever saw through ID's "it's not about the Designer!" transparent bullshit.   :D

Actually every biological experiment ever conducted supports baraminology. Lenski's experiment does.

ID is about the DESIGN and always has been. Again your childish ignorance, while amusing, means nothing.

But anyway I wouldn't expect a child-molesting, syphilis-riddled coward like Timmy Horton to understand.

What ? Do you mean the Dover school board are owed $1,000,011 in legal fees they paid out because you useless fucks are right?

Put your money where your foot is Joe. Go and see if Dover wants to have  second try.

Loser.

You are the useless fucks, Davey. You are the liars and cry-babies.

I don't need Dover. I have a kid I will be standing up for right here. They teach evolutionism in social studies here. For science they teach about measurements and quantification. So if they ever get around to having evolutionism presented in a science class the glaring contradiction should send their little heads spinning. My kid and her friends will be prepared.

Asswipe

Have you been on the Hajj to Mecca Joe? And if not why not?

Why would I? I have never been a follower of Islam and only followers of Islam do that.

So why did you claim to be a Muslim?

Your ignorance is amusing, Davey. All followers of Islam are Muslims but not all Muslims are followers of Islam. That is what the Islamic clerics in Saudi Arabia told me and that is what I go by.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,10:04   

Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,10:01)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ June 23 2015,08:48)
Joey:    
Quote
AGAIN, we do NOT need to know where the materials came from before we can determine if intelligent design exists. We do NOT need to know how the design was implemented before we can determine that intelligent design exists. All of that comes AFTER you ignorant ass.


Finally, Joey admits that nobody has identified design in biological systems. Or have I missed all of that research into the mechanisms of ID that come AFTER determining that Intelligent Design exists. If I have, please point me to a few peer-reviewed papers on the subject.

We have identified design in biology, moron.

By all that evidence which supports baraminology, right Chubs?

How long ago were the separate "kinds" designed?   :D

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."

- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,10:06   

Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,10:03)
Your ignorance is amusing, Davey. All followers of Islam are Muslims but not all Muslims are followers of Islam. That is what the Islamic clerics in Saudi Arabia told me and that is what I go by.

Chubby Joke Gallien, the Christian YEC Muslim.   :p

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."

- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,10:06   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 23 2015,08:10)
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,06:25)
Actually every biological experiment ever conducted supports baraminology. Lenski's experiment does.

ID is about the DESIGN and always has been. Again your childish ignorance, while amusing, means nothing.

LOL!  Chubs sticks his fat foot in his mouth again.

One post you tell us life was "designed to evolve" from the first eukaryote by using external environmental clues.

Next post you say all animals were Biblically created "kinds" as described by baraminology.

Make up your teeny suet-choked YEC mind, will ya Chubs?

You must be proud to be a cowardly loser, Timmy.

Quote
One post you tell us life was "designed to evolve" from the first eukaryote by using external environmental clues.


I never said that. Never.

Quote
Next post you say all animals were Biblically created "kinds" as described by baraminology.


All I have said is the evidence supports baraminology. Don't blame me for that.

But anyway your rant didn't make any sense and definitely didn't follow from the post you were allegedly responding to.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,10:07   

Quote (fnxtr @ June 23 2015,09:18)
(shrug)

Okay, Joe. You're right, we're wrong. There's a designer. CSI/dFDIWLEN/whatever proves it.

Now what?

Now we study it in that light. We would look for the software that runs biology.

Do you we have a better chance at understanding Stonehenge by studying it as an artifact or a natural formation?

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Acartia_Bogart



Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,10:07   

Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,10:01)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ June 23 2015,08:48)
Joey:  
Quote
AGAIN, we do NOT need to know where the materials came from before we can determine if intelligent design exists. We do NOT need to know how the design was implemented before we can determine that intelligent design exists. All of that comes AFTER you ignorant ass.


Finally, Joey admits that nobody has identified design in biological systems. Or have I missed all of that research into the mechanisms of ID that come AFTER determining that Intelligent Design exists. If I have, please point me to a few peer-reviewed papers on the subject.

We have identified design in biology, moron.

Then where is all this research into the ID mechanisms that can only start AFTER design is detected? Who is doing this research? Where are their peer reviewed papers being published? I'm sure that we would all be very interested in reading them.

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,10:08   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 23 2015,10:06)
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,10:03)
Your ignorance is amusing, Davey. All followers of Islam are Muslims but not all Muslims are followers of Islam. That is what the Islamic clerics in Saudi Arabia told me and that is what I go by.

Chubby Joke Gallien, the Christian YEC Muslim.   :p

Dumbass faggot timmy horton. spews shit because it has an asshole for a mouth.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,10:09   

Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ June 23 2015,10:07)
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,10:01)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ June 23 2015,08:48)
Joey:    
Quote
AGAIN, we do NOT need to know where the materials came from before we can determine if intelligent design exists. We do NOT need to know how the design was implemented before we can determine that intelligent design exists. All of that comes AFTER you ignorant ass.


Finally, Joey admits that nobody has identified design in biological systems. Or have I missed all of that research into the mechanisms of ID that come AFTER determining that Intelligent Design exists. If I have, please point me to a few peer-reviewed papers on the subject.

We have identified design in biology, moron.

Then where is all this research into the ID mechanisms that can only start AFTER design is detected? Who is doing this research? Where are their peer reviewed papers being published? I'm sure that we would all be very interested in reading them.

Please hold your breath while you wait. But thank you for admitting that your position has nothing.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,10:11   

Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,10:09)
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ June 23 2015,10:07)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,10:01)
 
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ June 23 2015,08:48)
Joey:      
Quote
AGAIN, we do NOT need to know where the materials came from before we can determine if intelligent design exists. We do NOT need to know how the design was implemented before we can determine that intelligent design exists. All of that comes AFTER you ignorant ass.


Finally, Joey admits that nobody has identified design in biological systems. Or have I missed all of that research into the mechanisms of ID that come AFTER determining that Intelligent Design exists. If I have, please point me to a few peer-reviewed papers on the subject.

We have identified design in biology, moron.

Then where is all this research into the ID mechanisms that can only start AFTER design is detected? Who is doing this research? Where are their peer reviewed papers being published? I'm sure that we would all be very interested in reading them.

Please hold your breath while you wait. But thank you for admitting that your position has nothing.

Chubby Joke Gallien, the Christian YEC Muslim.  Still the biggest blustering coward on the planet.  The privileged planet.  :D

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."

- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,10:11   

Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,09:31)
Quote (fnxtr @ June 23 2015,17:18)
(shrug)

Okay, Joe. You're right, we're wrong. There's a designer. CSI/dFDIWLEN/whatever proves it.

Now what?

Well now you claim frequency = wavelength
probability of zero is non existant (snikker)
The designer is Allah
ticks are vegetarian
Call everyone a homo HOMO!!

THAT'S WHAT!

Yes if you have the wavelength then you have the frequency. Zero = impossibility. I never said anything about Allah, obviously Davey is a whining pussy. And just because ticks go on watermelon doesn't mean they are vegetarian. Davey is an ignorant pussy.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,10:12   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 23 2015,10:11)
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,10:09)
 
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ June 23 2015,10:07)
 
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,10:01)
   
Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ June 23 2015,08:48)
Joey:      
Quote
AGAIN, we do NOT need to know where the materials came from before we can determine if intelligent design exists. We do NOT need to know how the design was implemented before we can determine that intelligent design exists. All of that comes AFTER you ignorant ass.


Finally, Joey admits that nobody has identified design in biological systems. Or have I missed all of that research into the mechanisms of ID that come AFTER determining that Intelligent Design exists. If I have, please point me to a few peer-reviewed papers on the subject.

We have identified design in biology, moron.

Then where is all this research into the ID mechanisms that can only start AFTER design is detected? Who is doing this research? Where are their peer reviewed papers being published? I'm sure that we would all be very interested in reading them.

Please hold your breath while you wait. But thank you for admitting that your position has nothing.

Chubby Joke Gallien, the Christian YEC Muslim.  Still the biggest blustering coward on the planet.  The privileged planet.  :D

Dumbass little faggot timmy horton molests little boys

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,10:14   

Quote (JonF @ June 23 2015,08:07)
Quote (Joe G @ June 22 2015,16:24)
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 22 2015,15:08)
 
Quote (Woodbine @ June 22 2015,15:05)
Hey, Joe....I've just checked in with the guys at the lab and you should see the size of the number they've found....it's massive!

Today Chubs also announced that you can't have a probability be zero.  But compared to his other stupidity that's nothing...  ;)

I said zero equals an impossibility. Richie already posted a reference that says a probability is between zero and one. Is zero between zero and one?

Depends, did he mean "between zero and one inclusive" or "between zero and one exclusive"?

Hint: the former.

Mathematicians recognize both closed and open intervals. Duh.

"Between" has a specific meaning.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,10:38   

Quote
"Between" has a specific meaning.

Like claiming ID as scientific then also admitting to be a YEC?

That puts your lard ass between a rock and a hard place.  :p

How many different designed, er, Designed "kinds" are there Chubs?

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."

- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,10:41   

Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,18:11)
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,09:31)
Quote (fnxtr @ June 23 2015,17:18)
(shrug)

Okay, Joe. You're right, we're wrong. There's a designer. CSI/dFDIWLEN/whatever proves it.

Now what?

Well now you claim frequency = wavelength
probability of zero is non existant (snikker)
The designer is Allah
ticks are vegetarian
Call everyone a homo HOMO!!

THAT'S WHAT!

Yes if you have the wavelength then you have the frequency. Zero = impossibility. I never said anything about Allah, obviously Davey is a whining pussy. And just because ticks go on watermelon doesn't mean they are vegetarian. Davey is an ignorant pussy.

Joe what's the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel? Stupid stupid man. And if Allah isn't the designer what is? As far as the ticks go you are the expert hahahahahah.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,10:59   

Quote
"Between" has a specific meaning.

how thick is the border between the US and mexico?

Edited by stevestory on June 23 2015,12:00

   
JonF



Posts: 634
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,11:11   

Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,11:14)
Quote (JonF @ June 23 2015,08:07)
Quote (Joe G @ June 22 2015,16:24)
 
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 22 2015,15:08)
 
Quote (Woodbine @ June 22 2015,15:05)
Hey, Joe....I've just checked in with the guys at the lab and you should see the size of the number they've found....it's massive!

Today Chubs also announced that you can't have a probability be zero.  But compared to his other stupidity that's nothing...  ;)

I said zero equals an impossibility. Richie already posted a reference that says a probability is between zero and one. Is zero between zero and one?

Depends, did he mean "between zero and one inclusive" or "between zero and one exclusive"?

Hint: the former.

Mathematicians recognize both closed and open intervals. Duh.

"Between" has a specific meaning.

In probability/math it has two meanings; open interval or closed interval.

In this case which is meant is intuitively obvious to the most casual observer, assuming that observer has two or more functioning brain cells.

That explains why you couldn't figure it out.

  
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,12:19   

Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,10:41)
Quote (Joe G @ June 23 2015,18:11)
Quote (k.e.. @ June 23 2015,09:31)
 
Quote (fnxtr @ June 23 2015,17:18)
(shrug)

Okay, Joe. You're right, we're wrong. There's a designer. CSI/dFDIWLEN/whatever proves it.

Now what?

Well now you claim frequency = wavelength
probability of zero is non existant (snikker)
The designer is Allah
ticks are vegetarian
Call everyone a homo HOMO!!

THAT'S WHAT!

Yes if you have the wavelength then you have the frequency. Zero = impossibility. I never said anything about Allah, obviously Davey is a whining pussy. And just because ticks go on watermelon doesn't mean they are vegetarian. Davey is an ignorant pussy.

Joe what's the frequency of a 10 meter wave in a block of steel? Stupid stupid man. And if Allah isn't the designer what is? As far as the ticks go you are the expert hahahahahah.

I don't have the wavelength, Davey. If you have it then just do the calculation you moron. Frequency = 1/T where T is the time it takes for one wavelength to be completed.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
Joe G



Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 23 2015,12:20   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ June 23 2015,10:38)
Quote
"Between" has a specific meaning.

Like claiming ID as scientific then also admitting to be a YEC?

That puts your lard ass between a rock and a hard place.  :p

How many different designed, er, Designed "kinds" are there Chubs?

ID is scientific and I never said I was a YEC. I don't accept the Bible as any sort of authority so that squashes your ignorance.

--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth

"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton

Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD

YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

   
  27552 replies since Feb. 24 2010,12:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (919) < ... 300 301 302 303 304 [305] 306 307 308 309 310 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]