Acartia_Bogart
Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014
|
| Quote (Joe G @ June 22 2015,20:25) | | Quote (Texas Teach @ June 22 2015,17:41) | | Quote (Joe G @ June 22 2015,15:23) | | Quote (OgreMkV @ June 22 2015,14:57) | | Quote (Joe G @ June 22 2015,11:14) | | Quote (OgreMkV @ June 21 2015,19:08) | | Quote (Richardthughes @ June 20 2015,09:52) | | Quote | 6
Virgil Cain
June 20, 2015 at 6:49 am
It looks like the E coli engineered themselves to accompany the new gene. James Shapiro and Lee Spetner must be smiling. |
Chubs lets the designer out of the bag: E Coli. |
As usual, chubs says whatever he thinks will get himself out of his current losing argument without considering the ramifications.
Well, then who (or what) designed E. coli?
The evolutionary relationships between the two bacteria Escherichia coli and Haemophilus influenzae and their putative last common ancestor
Published in 1998. Surely, someone as well read as Joey would know about that one. Oh yeah, I forgot, he has a reading problem. Poor guy. |
Well, Kevin, you don't have a mechanism capable of producing a living organism, so you lose, again. Bacteria evolving into bacteria doesn't help you.
Also there wasn't any losing argument and you don't know anything about ramifications. If you did then you would understand the ramifications of evolutionism. |
So please provide the detailed mechanisms of how E. coli designed itself new traits.
With peer-reviewed references to said mechanisms.
Sufficient to show that you really are following the actual science, not just what you wish was true. |
Kevin, your position is void of details you imbecile. If you had something then ID would be a non-starter. But you have nothing but whining. It suits you. |
Joe finally got something right. ID is a non-starter. |
And yet ID has started and you have nothing to stop it. |
With its biggest proponents being a BBB D- rated lawyer, a philosopher, a paranoid engineer from Monserrat and a toaster repairman, I don't think that we have to worry about it being taken seriously by anyone.
|
