NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Jan. 09 2016,19:58) | I had no idea that there was so much evidence in my favor.
As I suspected it was probably not "passive transfer of charge from bee to flower" and was more likely an action potential. |
There can be nothing but evidence in your favor when your position remains ill-defined, ad hoc, and generalized past the point where it would be informative.
Your vaunted "premise" is telling -- how could there be evidence against it?
When you perform cargo-cult rituals of appropriation of products you do not understand, the results of processes you do not understand, applied to data you do not understand, you do nothing of value to anyone.
Crows are notorious for collecting 'shiny objects'. You appear to be rather ill-shaped crow, treating the results of science and the actual-factual of the real world as 'shiny objects'. You have thoroughly inflated your own sense of your importance by the number of shiny objects you have found.
No one else cares. You merely gather, you do not curate.
You do not elucidate nor do you illuminate. Still less do you connect or explain.
All the value, with no exception, comes from others.
Your contribution is the excrement you toss about, mal-labeled as "theory", as "explanatory".
Your work ranges from banal to insane, a route that does not even pass through sanity nor science.
Yet you believe that the real work of real scientists (not real-scientists, who are not real) provide real support for your surreal fragmentary outbursts.
It would be tragic were it not so transparently absurd.
You fall to the simple logical truth that false implies both true and false. From a false premise, any conclusion can follow.
Given that your entire output is false, where it is meaningful, it implies everything. Sadly for you, that means it is useless.
|
