RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (42) < ... 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 >   
  Topic: MrIntelligentDesign, Edgar Postrado's new Intelligent Design< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
MrIntelligentDesign



Posts: 405
Joined: Sep. 2015

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,07:37   

Quote (Quack @ Oct. 31 2015,02:07)
Quote
When your child ask you about "intelligence", what would be your answer without my new discovery? You will surely tell lie to your child.

Allright. You won't tell a lie. You will tell the truth. Agreed?

You can tell the truth about intelligence here, just like you would tell a child, without X - a child can't be expected to fathom the wonders you perform with X.

I've already told you in my OP and some explanations about the real and universal intelligence BUT you did not even counter it with your own version!  Thus, you have nothing and I have the best science!

  
MrIntelligentDesign



Posts: 405
Joined: Sep. 2015

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,07:39   

Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 31 2015,01:31)
[quote=MrIntelligentDesign,Oct. 30 2015,21:07][quote=k.e..,Oct. 30 2015,09:54]
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 30 2015,13:21)
Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 27 2015,07:03)
 
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 27 2015,03:44)
   
Quote (Glen Davidson @ Oct. 26 2015,21:37)
     
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 26 2015,21:21)
 
You have religion only...

You got noew!

LOL!!!

Bring me yo

or SHUT UP!

D

Do you get it?

LOL!!!

You have nothing! No science!

When yo"t my new discovery? You ur child.

Unless you provide us with the article and journal you published your "findings" in, you don't have any science while evolution has tonnes of it.

Tons of evidences???

LOL!!

FUNNY!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v....a8opZ30

  
ChemiCat



Posts: 532
Joined: Nov. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,08:10   

Quote
Our side has presented a bit of logic, reasoning, evidence, and references, but I'm sure to Postretardo it looks just like us saying "No you don't".


I was trying to be brief for our side but was trying to project how Postcardo thinks. I think I wasn't too far off the mark judging by the preceding screeds from him.

So, Postcardo, all I have to do to be a "real-scientist" is to self-publish a book or two refuting your "books" and I am a god, right?

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,08:11   

[quote=MrIntelligentDesign,Oct. 31 2015,15:39][quote=EmperorZelos,Oct. 31 2015,01:31]
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 30 2015,21:07)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ Oct. 30 2015,09:54)
 
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 30 2015,13:21)
   
Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 27 2015,07:03)
   
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 27 2015,03:44)
     
Quote (Glen Davidson @ Oct. 26 2015,21:37)
       
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 26 2015,21:21)
 
You have religion only...

You got noew!

LOL!!!

Bring me yo

or SHUT UP!

D

Do you get it?

LOL!!!

You have nothing! No science!

When yo"t my new discovery? You ur child.

Unless you provide us with the article and journal you published your "findings" in, you don't have any science while evolution has tonnes of it.

Tons of evidences???

LOL!!

FUNNY!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v....a8opZ30


You're a comic book ID meme Tardposto.




--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
dazz



Posts: 247
Joined: Mar. 2015

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,09:17   

Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,14:39)
[quote=EmperorZelos,Oct. 31 2015,01:31][quote=MrIntelligentDesign,Oct. 30 2015,21:07]
Quote (k.e.. @ Oct. 30 2015,09:54)
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 30 2015,13:21)
 
Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 27 2015,07:03)
 
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 27 2015,03:44)
   
Quote (Glen Davidson @ Oct. 26 2015,21:37)
     
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 26 2015,21:21)
 
You have religion only...

You got noew!

LOL!!!

Bring me yo

or SHUT UP!

D

Do you get it?

LOL!!!

You have nothing! No science!

When yo"t my new discovery? You ur child.

Unless you provide us with the article and journal you published your "findings" in, you don't have any science while evolution has tonnes of it.

Tons of evidences???

LOL!!

FUNNY!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v....a8opZ30

Oh boy, this guy is that special kind of retard. One of a kind.

Have you seen the part of that vid where he weighs books about evolution to check if there's "tons" of evidence for evolution?

Hilarious, hahaha

  
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,09:46   

Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,08:37)
Quote (Quack @ Oct. 31 2015,02:07)
Quote
When your child ask you about "intelligence", what would be your answer without my new discovery? You will surely tell lie to your child.

Allright. You won't tell a lie. You will tell the truth. Agreed?

You can tell the truth about intelligence here, just like you would tell a child, without X - a child can't be expected to fathom the wonders you perform with X.

I've already told you in my OP and some explanations about the real and universal intelligence BUT you did not even counter it with your own version!  Thus, you have nothing and I have the best science!

We've countered with logic, reason and evidence.  All of which show that your OP and your subsequent posts are worthless.
No need to present a 'different version' or 'counter theory' when your swill doesn't even make coherent consistent sense.
You've got nothing.  We've proved it.
You lose.

  
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,09:50   

Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,08:32)
Quote (NoName @ Oct. 31 2015,06:10)
Quote (ChemiCat @ Oct. 31 2015,05:49)
Postcardo; I do have real-science!
Us; No, you don't.
Postcardo; Do too!
Us; Prove it.
Postcardo; I have real-science!!
Us; No you don't
Postcardo; Do too and you're all poopy-heads!
Us; So no evidence then and the "egg-drop" proves nothing.
Postcardo; You atheist-scientists are religious!!!!
Us; WHAT?
Postcardo; I am the god of IA!!11!!!!one.##

Does this sum up the thread so far?

Edgar's part is pretty accurately represented.
Our side has presented a bit of logic, reasoning, evidence, and references, but I'm sure to Postretardo it looks just like us saying "No you don't".
Pity, really.  

A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

Not that Edgar's takes up much space in a trash bag, but still.

YOU'RE FUNNY!

In science, if you think you have something to say, you can just write book on it and make any replacement for existing explanations..[/quote]
No one but anti-science cranks think this is true.
This is absolutely not how science is done.  Not how the world works.
We've explained this repeatedly.  You've never provided a counter to our objections.
You've never presented evidence that this how science works.
You lose.
You can't even see reality in your rear-view mirror, can you?
Quote
I have all of them...you have nothing!

Intelligence? I have, you don't!

Obviously false.
[quote]Evolution? Obsolete..I have Biological Interrelation, BiTs...

You have no science..I have the best science...

That is why PUT UP or SHUT UP!

Nope.
We don't need to for we've shown your nonsense doesn't even make it to the starting gate.
You demonstrably have no science at all.
You can explain nothing.
You demonstrably don't even know what the words you toss around mean.

You need to put up before you demand that of others.
You don't win by shouting at people and repeating falsehoods.
That's why you continue to fail.

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,09:56   

Quote (NoName @ Oct. 31 2015,17:46)
 
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,08:37)
 
Quote (Quack @ Oct. 31 2015,02:07)
   
Quote
When your child ask you about "intelligence", what would be your answer without my new discovery? You will surely tell lie to your child.

Allright. You won't tell a lie. You will tell the truth. Agreed?

You can tell the truth about intelligence here, just like you would tell a child, without X - a child can't be expected to fathom the wonders you perform with X.

I've already told you in my OP and some explanations about the real and universal intelligence BUT you did not even counter it with your own version!  Thus, you have nothing and I have the best science!

We've countered with logic, counter swill, reason and evidence.  All of which show that your OP and your subsequent posts are worthless.
No need to present a 'different version' or 'counter theory' when your swill doesn't even make coherent consistent sense.
You've got nothing.  We've proved it.
You lose.

fixed :(

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,10:37   



--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
EmperorZelos



Posts: 81
Joined: Oct. 2015

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,12:25   

Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,07:32)
In science, if you think you have something to say, you can just write book on it and make any replacement for existing explanations..

No, in science if you have anything you write a fucking peer reviewed article and submit it to a journal.

  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,13:50   

Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 31 2015,20:25)
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,07:32)
In science, if you think you have something to say, you can just write book on it and make any replacement for existing explanations..

No, in science if you have anything you write a fucking peer reviewed article and submit it to a journal.

Even without the fucking Edgar. Jesus would be ashamed.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
MrIntelligentDesign



Posts: 405
Joined: Sep. 2015

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,15:56   

Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 31 2015,12:25)
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,07:32)
In science, if you think you have something to say, you can just write book on it and make any replacement for existing explanations..

No, in science if you have anything you write a fucking peer reviewed article and submit it to a journal.

What if I give you e-mail from a peer-reviewer journal telling me or encouraging me to write all of my new discoveries in science books? Will you shut up now and support me and ask forgiveness to me since you are telling lies??

YOU ARE NOTHING and you have no science! You will have science when you support me..

  
MrIntelligentDesign



Posts: 405
Joined: Sep. 2015

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,15:58   

Quote (ChemiCat @ Oct. 31 2015,08:10)
Quote
Our side has presented a bit of logic, reasoning, evidence, and references, but I'm sure to Postretardo it looks just like us saying "No you don't".


I was trying to be brief for our side but was trying to project how Postcardo thinks. I think I wasn't too far off the mark judging by the preceding screeds from him.

So, Postcardo, all I have to do to be a "real-scientist" is to self-publish a book or two refuting your "books" and I am a god, right?

Yes, you must publish your science books and tell the world that you have science IF THE PEER-REVIEWERS were dumb enough to understand them

or

THE PEER-REVIEWERS were afraid that ToE will fall on their hands...

The latter will be the main reason...

  
MrIntelligentDesign



Posts: 405
Joined: Sep. 2015

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,15:59   

Quote (k.e.. @ Oct. 31 2015,08:11)
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,15:39)
Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 31 2015,01:31)
 
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 30 2015,21:07)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ Oct. 30 2015,09:54)
   
Quote (Mr 30 2015 @ 13:21)
   
Quote (Emper 27 2015 @ 07:03)
     
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 27 2015,03:44)
       
Quote (MrIntel2015 @ 21:21)
 
You have religion only...

You got noew!

LOL!!!

Bring me yo

or SHUT UP!

D

Do you get it?

LOL!!!

You have nothing! No science!

When yo"t my new discovery? You ur child.

Unless you provide us with the article and journal you published your "findings" in+you don't have any science while evolution has tonnes of it.[/quote-->
Quote (Glen Davi21:37]          
Quote (MrIntel2015 @ 21:21)
 
You have religion only...

You got noew!

LOL!!!

Bring me yo

or SHUT UP!

D

Do you get it?

LOL!!!

You have nothing! No science!

When yo"t my new discovery? You ur child.[/quote]
Unless you provide us with the article and journal you published your "findings" in @ you don't have any science while evolution has tonnes of it.[/quote)

Tons of evidences???

LOL!!

FUNNY!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v....a8opZ30


You're a comic book ID meme Tardposto.



LOL!!

YOU ARE BECOMING CRAZY EVERYDAY!!!!

  
MrIntelligentDesign



Posts: 405
Joined: Sep. 2015

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,16:01   

Quote (dazz @ Oct. 31 2015,09:17)
[quote=MrIntelligentDesign,Oct. 31 2015,14:39][quote=EmperorZelos,Oct. 31 2015,01:31]
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 30 2015,21:07)
Quote (k.e.. @ Oct. 30 2015,09:54)
 
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 30 2015,13:21)
 
Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 27 2015,07:03)
   
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 27 2015,03:44)
     
Quote (Glen Davidson @ Oct. 26 2015,21:37)
       
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 26 2015,21:21)
 
You have religion only...

You got noew!

LOL!!!

Bring me yo

or SHUT UP!

D

Do you get it?

LOL!!!

You have nothing! No science!

When yo"t my new discovery? You ur child.

Unless you provide us with the article and journal you published your "findings" in, you don't have any science while evolution has tonnes of it.

Tons of evidences???

LOL!!

FUNNY!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v....a8opZ30

Oh boy, this guy is that special kind of retard. One of a kind.

Have you seen the part of that vid where he weighs books about evolution to check if there's "tons" of evidence for evolution?

Hilarious, hahaha

Yes, to show that I'm serious and have sense of humor, I followed your claim that TONS of evidences...of ToE???

ARE YOU REALLY CRAZY??

  
MrIntelligentDesign



Posts: 405
Joined: Sep. 2015

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,16:03   

Quote (NoName @ Oct. 31 2015,09:46)
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,08:37)
Quote (Quack @ Oct. 31 2015,02:07)
 
Quote
When your child ask you about "intelligence", what would be your answer without my new discovery? You will surely tell lie to your child.

Allright. You won't tell a lie. You will tell the truth. Agreed?

You can tell the truth about intelligence here, just like you would tell a child, without X - a child can't be expected to fathom the wonders you perform with X.

I've already told you in my OP and some explanations about the real and universal intelligence BUT you did not even counter it with your own version!  Thus, you have nothing and I have the best science!

We've countered with logic, reason and evidence.  All of which show that your OP and your subsequent posts are worthless.
No need to present a 'different version' or 'counter theory' when your swill doesn't even make coherent consistent sense.
You've got nothing.  We've proved it.
You lose.

You have no logic, reasoning, science and explanation since you could not provide an alternative explanation or replacement of my new discoveries..

Thus, you lied and constantly telling lies...

YOU ARE WASTING the bandwidth of the forum..

  
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,16:05   

Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,16:56)
Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 31 2015,12:25)
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,07:32)
In science, if you think you have something to say, you can just write book on it and make any replacement for existing explanations..

No, in science if you have anything you write a fucking peer reviewed article and submit it to a journal.

What if I give you e-mail from a peer-reviewer journal telling me or encouraging me to write all of my new discoveries in science books? Will you shut up now and support me and ask forgiveness to me since you are telling lies??

YOU ARE NOTHING and you have no science! You will have science when you support me..

You're a lunatic.

Given that you have proven to be a liar, who would believe you if you sent an email that you claimed to have received with such encouragement?

You're the one here who is lying.
You're the one here who is demonstrably clueless about science.
You're the one here who is demonstrably clueless about logic.
You're the one who thinks categorization is explanation -- it is not.
The only way to support you or your efforts would be to abandon science and, ultimately rationality and even sanity.
You have nothing to offer.
Nothing at all.
Provably so.

  
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,16:07   

Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,17:03)
Quote (NoName @ Oct. 31 2015,09:46)
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,08:37)
 
Quote (Quack @ Oct. 31 2015,02:07)
 
Quote
When your child ask you about "intelligence", what would be your answer without my new discovery? You will surely tell lie to your child.

Allright. You won't tell a lie. You will tell the truth. Agreed?

You can tell the truth about intelligence here, just like you would tell a child, without X - a child can't be expected to fathom the wonders you perform with X.

I've already told you in my OP and some explanations about the real and universal intelligence BUT you did not even counter it with your own version!  Thus, you have nothing and I have the best science!

We've countered with logic, reason and evidence.  All of which show that your OP and your subsequent posts are worthless.
No need to present a 'different version' or 'counter theory' when your swill doesn't even make coherent consistent sense.
You've got nothing.  We've proved it.
You lose.

You have no logic, reasoning, science and explanation since you could not provide an alternative explanation or replacement of my new discoveries..

Thus, you lied and constantly telling lies...

YOU ARE WASTING the bandwidth of the forum..

More lies.

You cannot demonstrate a single thing I have said to be untrue.
I, on the other hand, can easily show that you have posted multiple different claims each of which is false.

You are wasting the molecules you consume for nutrition, the oxygen you consume for metabolism.
You are a blot on the planet.
You run away from serious discussion, preferring instead to cast insults and shout 'shut up shut up'.
That is not how science works.   Hell, that's not how grownups work.
What are you, six?  Or is that just your IQ?

  
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,16:10   

Edgar, please take note.
It does not require a replacement to show that your notions are illogical, ill-conceived, ill-constructed, and lack explanatory power.
Until you reach the level where your work is logical, well-conceived, well constructed, and is capable of actually explaining a clearly and operationally defined phenomenon, no one is under any obligation to replace it.
To insist that others must do so is the sign of an internet crank.  They are the only people who believe this is required.
You have never defended the claim that this is how science works.  You can't, because you know nothing of science or how it is done.  Worse, you can't because you are flat-out wrong.
On this, as on all other matters.  You are consistently, totally, wildly incorrect.
You lose.

  
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,16:12   

Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,17:01)
[quote=dazz,Oct. 31 2015,09:17][quote=MrIntelligentDesign,Oct. 31 2015,14:39]
Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 31 2015,01:31)
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 30 2015,21:07)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ Oct. 30 2015,09:54)
 
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 30 2015,13:21)
   
Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 27 2015,07:03)
   
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 27 2015,03:44)
     
Quote (Glen Davidson @ Oct. 26 2015,21:37)
       
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 26 2015,21:21)
 
You have religion only...

You got noew!

LOL!!!

Bring me yo

or SHUT UP!

D

Do you get it?

LOL!!!

You have nothing! No science!

When yo"t my new discovery? You ur child.

Unless you provide us with the article and journal you published your "findings" in, you don't have any science while evolution has tonnes of it.

Tons of evidences???

LOL!!

FUNNY!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v....a8opZ30

Oh boy, this guy is that special kind of retard. One of a kind.

Have you seen the part of that vid where he weighs books about evolution to check if there's "tons" of evidence for evolution?

Hilarious, hahaha

Yes, to show that I'm serious and have sense of humor, I followed your claim that TONS of evidences...of ToE???

ARE YOU REALLY CRAZY??

You don't even understand how to apply the metric.
The value can be estimated, on your ludicrous misunderstanding of the phrase, by collecting or estimating the print run of all books on the ToE, gathering the average weight of each tome, and summing.
The result easily exceeds single-digit tons.

As always, you lose.
You lack a sufficient sense of humor, or even sufficient sense, to see how hilariously funny this actually is.

  
dazz



Posts: 247
Joined: Mar. 2015

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,16:26   

Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,22:56)
Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 31 2015,12:25)
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,07:32)
In science, if you think you have something to say, you can just write book on it and make any replacement for existing explanations..

No, in science if you have anything you write a fucking peer reviewed article and submit it to a journal.

What if I give you e-mail from a peer-reviewer journal telling me or encouraging me to write all of my new discoveries in science books? Will you shut up now and support me and ask forgiveness to me since you are telling lies??

YOU ARE NOTHING and you have no science! You will have science when you support me..

Poor retard, don't you realize that was them politely telling you that they don't care about your nonsense and that you were wasting your time (and theirs) aiming for peer reviewed journals?

Of course you didn't realize that. You're far too stupid.

Listen carefully Postardo, they were telling you to leave them alone and stop pestering journals, cause your crap is unpublishable.

Get it now?, poor little retard

  
MrIntelligentDesign



Posts: 405
Joined: Sep. 2015

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,16:41   

Quote (dazz @ Oct. 31 2015,16:26)
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,22:56)
Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 31 2015,12:25)
 
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,07:32)
In science, if you think you have something to say, you can just write book on it and make any replacement for existing explanations..

No, in science if you have anything you write a fucking peer reviewed article and submit it to a journal.

What if I give you e-mail from a peer-reviewer journal telling me or encouraging me to write all of my new discoveries in science books? Will you shut up now and support me and ask forgiveness to me since you are telling lies??

YOU ARE NOTHING and you have no science! You will have science when you support me..

Poor retard, don't you realize that was them politely telling you that they don't care about your nonsense and that you were wasting your time (and theirs) aiming for peer reviewed journals?

Of course you didn't realize that. You're far too stupid.

Listen carefully Postardo, they were telling you to leave them alone and stop pestering journals, cause your crap is unpublishable.

Get it now?, poor little retard

If my science were unpublishable, then, they will never say to publish them in science books.

THOSE reviewers were afraid that ToE will fall into their hands since they will surely lose the their jobs..

They had already biases in reviews. Thus, I don't rely on them..I rely on my science...

  
MrIntelligentDesign



Posts: 405
Joined: Sep. 2015

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,16:43   

Quote (NoName @ Oct. 31 2015,16:05)
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,16:56)
Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 31 2015,12:25)
 
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,07:32)
In science, if you think you have something to say, you can just write book on it and make any replacement for existing explanations..

No, in science if you have anything you write a fucking peer reviewed article and submit it to a journal.

What if I give you e-mail from a peer-reviewer journal telling me or encouraging me to write all of my new discoveries in science books? Will you shut up now and support me and ask forgiveness to me since you are telling lies??

YOU ARE NOTHING and you have no science! You will have science when you support me..

You're a lunatic.

Given that you have proven to be a liar, who would believe you if you sent an email that you claimed to have received with such encouragement?

You're the one here who is lying.
You're the one here who is demonstrably clueless about science.
You're the one here who is demonstrably clueless about logic.
You're the one who thinks categorization is explanation -- it is not.
The only way to support you or your efforts would be to abandon science and, ultimately rationality and even sanity.
You have nothing to offer.
Nothing at all.
Provably so.

YOU ARE NOTHING since you have no science.

You are both lunatic and religious since you cannot replace my new discoveries...

thus, SHUT UP and support me!

  
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,16:48   

Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,17:41)
Quote (dazz @ Oct. 31 2015,16:26)
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,22:56)
 
Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 31 2015,12:25)
 
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,07:32)
In science, if you think you have something to say, you can just write book on it and make any replacement for existing explanations..

No, in science if you have anything you write a fucking peer reviewed article and submit it to a journal.

What if I give you e-mail from a peer-reviewer journal telling me or encouraging me to write all of my new discoveries in science books? Will you shut up now and support me and ask forgiveness to me since you are telling lies??

YOU ARE NOTHING and you have no science! You will have science when you support me..

Poor retard, don't you realize that was them politely telling you that they don't care about your nonsense and that you were wasting your time (and theirs) aiming for peer reviewed journals?

Of course you didn't realize that. You're far too stupid.

Listen carefully Postardo, they were telling you to leave them alone and stop pestering journals, cause your crap is unpublishable.

Get it now?, poor little retard

If my science were unpublishable, then, they will never say to publish them in science books.

THOSE reviewers were afraid that ToE will fall into their hands since they will surely lose the their jobs..

They had already biases in reviews. Thus, I don't rely on them..I rely on my science...

You have no science.
You are a delusional and dishonest loser.

  
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,16:53   

Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,17:43)
Quote (NoName @ Oct. 31 2015,16:05)
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,16:56)
 
Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 31 2015,12:25)
 
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,07:32)
In science, if you think you have something to say, you can just write book on it and make any replacement for existing explanations..

No, in science if you have anything you write a fucking peer reviewed article and submit it to a journal.

What if I give you e-mail from a peer-reviewer journal telling me or encouraging me to write all of my new discoveries in science books? Will you shut up now and support me and ask forgiveness to me since you are telling lies??

YOU ARE NOTHING and you have no science! You will have science when you support me..

You're a lunatic.

Given that you have proven to be a liar, who would believe you if you sent an email that you claimed to have received with such encouragement?

You're the one here who is lying.
You're the one here who is demonstrably clueless about science.
You're the one here who is demonstrably clueless about logic.
You're the one who thinks categorization is explanation -- it is not.
The only way to support you or your efforts would be to abandon science and, ultimately rationality and even sanity.
You have nothing to offer.
Nothing at all.
Provably so.

YOU ARE NOTHING since you have no science.

You are both lunatic and religious since you cannot replace my new discoveries...

thus, SHUT UP and support me!

Many fine, upstanding persons, valuable and well-liked persons who are honest and who add value to their communities have no science.
But you are not one of them.  You are demonstrably dishonest, disliked, of no value to this, nor likely any other, community.  And you have no science.  Provably so.

We have no more need to replace your incoherent and useless notions than a surgeon has need to replace a malignant tumor.
The absence is better than the presence in both cases.

Stop lying.

  
Occam's Aftershave



Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,17:33   

Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,15:56)
What if I give you e-mail from a peer-reviewer journal telling me or encouraging me to write all of my new discoveries in science books? Will you shut up now and support me and ask forgiveness to me since you are telling lies??

That was a rejection letter politely telling you the only way to get your batshit insane idea published is to do it yourself.  Which you apparently did.

--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."

- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

  
MrIntelligentDesign



Posts: 405
Joined: Sep. 2015

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,17:44   

Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Oct. 31 2015,17:33)
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,15:56)
What if I give you e-mail from a peer-reviewer journal telling me or encouraging me to write all of my new discoveries in science books? Will you shut up now and support me and ask forgiveness to me since you are telling lies??

That was a rejection letter politely telling you the only way to get your batshit insane idea published is to do it yourself.  Which you apparently did.

They were afraid that ToE will fall into their hands and lost their jobs on the following month!

  
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,18:19   

Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,18:44)
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Oct. 31 2015,17:33)
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,15:56)
What if I give you e-mail from a peer-reviewer journal telling me or encouraging me to write all of my new discoveries in science books? Will you shut up now and support me and ask forgiveness to me since you are telling lies??

That was a rejection letter politely telling you the only way to get your batshit insane idea published is to do it yourself.  Which you apparently did.

They were afraid that ToE will fall into their hands and lost their jobs on the following month!

Yup, batshit insane.

  
MrIntelligentDesign



Posts: 405
Joined: Sep. 2015

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,19:11   

Quote (NoName @ Oct. 31 2015,18:19)
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,18:44)
Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Oct. 31 2015,17:33)
 
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,15:56)
What if I give you e-mail from a peer-reviewer journal telling me or encouraging me to write all of my new discoveries in science books? Will you shut up now and support me and ask forgiveness to me since you are telling lies??

That was a rejection letter politely telling you the only way to get your batshit insane idea published is to do it yourself.  Which you apparently did.

They were afraid that ToE will fall into their hands and lost their jobs on the following month!

Yup, batshit insane.

LOL!!!

Thus, ToE's action of suppressing real science is really BATSHITS!! LOL!!

You had proven it!

  
MrIntelligentDesign



Posts: 405
Joined: Sep. 2015

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 31 2015,19:13   

Quote (NoName @ Oct. 31 2015,16:53)
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,17:43)
Quote (NoName @ Oct. 31 2015,16:05)
 
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,16:56)
 
Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 31 2015,12:25)
   
Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 31 2015,07:32)
In science, if you think you have something to say, you can just write book on it and make any replacement for existing explanations..

No, in science if you have anything you write a fucking peer reviewed article and submit it to a journal.

What if I give you e-mail from a peer-reviewer journal telling me or encouraging me to write all of my new discoveries in science books? Will you shut up now and support me and ask forgiveness to me since you are telling lies??

YOU ARE NOTHING and you have no science! You will have science when you support me..

You're a lunatic.

Given that you have proven to be a liar, who would believe you if you sent an email that you claimed to have received with such encouragement?

You're the one here who is lying.
You're the one here who is demonstrably clueless about science.
You're the one here who is demonstrably clueless about logic.
You're the one who thinks categorization is explanation -- it is not.
The only way to support you or your efforts would be to abandon science and, ultimately rationality and even sanity.
You have nothing to offer.
Nothing at all.
Provably so.

YOU ARE NOTHING since you have no science.

You are both lunatic and religious since you cannot replace my new discoveries...

thus, SHUT UP and support me!

Many fine, upstanding persons, valuable and well-liked persons who are honest and who add value to their communities have no science.
But you are not one of them.  You are demonstrably dishonest, disliked, of no value to this, nor likely any other, community.  And you have no science.  Provably so.

We have no more need to replace your incoherent and useless notions than a surgeon has need to replace a malignant tumor.
The absence is better than the presence in both cases.

Stop lying.

If they were honest, they will clean the mess that ToE had messed..ToE had messed intelligence and made 80 definitions of intelligence...

http://arxiv.org/pdf....639.pdf

  
  1252 replies since Sep. 30 2015,06:36 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (42) < ... 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]