Marion Delgado
Posts: 89
Joined: Nov. 2007
|
In the face of all criticism and counter arguments, let me press my case nonetheless*.
MC lets you infer there MUST be frontloading, without necessarily inferring any design or designer.
For instance, fully 49%, or nearly half, of all MC positions require the jokingly named thermidore triple bypass (from some movie, I believe).
That is a frontloaded strategy that cannot be arrived at by stochastic processes of random innovation or deviation coupled with game winning selection.
Some people are uncomfortable with MC, because it can literally get you from, say, Noah's ark to the present without invoking Darwinism.
But the consequences of a theory are irrelevant to its truth. objectivity coupled with MC should let the chips fall where they may.
All the created kinds, if you insist on using outdated creationist terms, from a period 6000 years ago, can be represented with a mapping equation by Earl's Court, Elephant and Castle, and Gloucester.
If you represent the entire biosphere by the current London Tube Station system *including stations that are no longer in operation* and use Victoria Station to represent EITHER Man or Beetlekind, you can show that the rules of MC enable you to precisely match the true fossil record.
This discovery is indeed Nobel caliber, but I am already girding my loins to be expelled from the Nobel process.
|
