RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (356) < ... 172 173 174 175 176 [177] 178 179 180 181 182 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 4, Fostering a Greater Understanding of IDC< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: July 20 2012,15:30   

Quote (Zachriel @ July 20 2012,11:07)
Argument by definition.

 
Quote
StephenB: By definition, a “natural cause” is defined as law/chance. Intelligence from any source, therefore, cannot be a natural cause.

That is, unless there is an overlap between the categories, such as intelligence being due to law/chance, even in part.



 
Quote
StephenB: We must differentiate between [1] “nature,” which is not creative and repetitiously follows the laws of matter as an effect vs. [2] “art,” which reshapes matter and creates something new as a cause.

Unless, of course, nature can be creative.



 
Quote
StephenB: Beyond that, we must differentiate between (2a) Divine or Angelic art (or any other alleged superhuman cause) and (2b) human art. I refer to the former as “supernatural intelligence” and the latter as “non-natural” intelligence. When the ID proponent analyzes data, he can scientifically detect the difference between [1] and [2], but he cannot, without the help of a philosopher, detect the difference between (2a) and (2b)

Only a philosopher can tell whether or not the Brooklyn Bridge is Angelic Art? The workers who built the Brooklyn Bridge may not have been devils, but it is highly doubtful they were angels.


"When the ID proponent analyzes data, he can scientifically detect..."



--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 20 2012,16:00   

And Tick-on-Mellon specialist Joe G has turned up to tell Carl Zimmer to buy the book.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 20 2012,16:24   

BYDAND!

And Constitutional Crisis expert and beater of children with a leather belt monster, KFC has turned up to get upset with Carl Zimmer (correctly) labeling IDiots as creationists.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 20 2012,17:46   

gonna post this here right now
Quote
'For their computer simulation, the researchers had the advantage of extensive scientific literature on the bacterium. They were able to use data taken from more than 900 scientific papers to validate the accuracy of their software model. Still, they said that the model of the simplest biological system was pushing the limits of their computers. "Right now, running a simulation for a single cell to divide only one time takes around 10 hours and generates half a gigabyte of data," Dr. Covert wrote. "I find this fact completely fascinating, because I don’t know that anyone has ever asked how much data a living thing truly holds. We often think of the DNA as the storage medium, but clearly there is more to it than that." In designing their model, the scientists chose an approach that parallels the design of modern software systems, known as object-oriented programming. Software designers organize their programs in modules, which communicate with one another by passing data and instructions back and forth. Similarly, the simulated bacterium is a series of modules that mimic the different functions of the cell.'"

http://www.nytimes.com/2012.......re.html

And just wait....

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
NormOlsen



Posts: 104
Joined: Nov. 2011

(Permalink) Posted: July 20 2012,21:12   

All Claims Made as the Result of a Computer Simulation Should be Considered BS, Until Gil Says Otherwise:

Quote
I then noticed something. The solid finite elements were modeled with four-node tetrahedrons, not ten-node, second-order tetras that would provide the requisite degrees of freedom to make the model work correctly.

I realize that what I have written will make eyes glaze over, but the point is:


I'm really, really smart!!

  
NormOlsen



Posts: 104
Joined: Nov. 2011

(Permalink) Posted: July 20 2012,21:15   

Hmm, my tiny url is broken, perhaps not enough nodes or something, I dunno, I'm not so smart.  Anyways, it was a UD link as if that wasn't obvious.

  
BillB



Posts: 388
Joined: Aug. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,01:45   

Anyone care to place bets on whick UD regular will be first to blame the cinema shootings on Darwin?

  
didymos



Posts: 1828
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,02:27   

Quote (BillB @ July 20 2012,23:45)
Anyone care to place bets on whick UD regular will be first to blame the cinema shootings on Darwin?

Barrogant.  He's always gotten a ghoulish delight out of these things. Plus, it happened in Colorado.

--------------
I wouldn't be bothered reading about the selfish gene because it has never been identified. -- Denyse O'Leary, professional moron
Again "how much". I don't think that's a good way to be quantitative.-- gpuccio

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,03:47   

Quote (didymos @ July 21 2012,00:27)
Quote (BillB @ July 20 2012,23:45)
Anyone care to place bets on whick UD regular will be first to blame the cinema shootings on Darwin?

Barrogant.  He's always gotten a ghoulish delight out of these things. Plus, it happened in Colorado.

You're likely right, although it wouldn't surprise me if o'leary beats him to it. And of course mullings will chime in at some point and blame it on "Darwinism", methodological naturalism, evolutionary materialism, and the 'de-christianization' of the USA.

I'm sure that arrington is also thinking of how to make money off the situation by suing somebody. He probably rushed to the scene, chased the ambulances, and handed out his business card to the survivors.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Kattarina98



Posts: 1267
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,04:18   

Quote (BillB @ July 21 2012,01:45)
Anyone care to place bets on whick UD regular will be first to blame the cinema shootings on Darwin?

It will be someone who can write a nice No True Scotsman script accounting for the fact that the shooter was a churchgoing Christian. So my bet is on KF.

ETA: I feel deeply sorry for the victims and their friends and families.

Edited by Kattarina98 on July 21 2012,04:24

--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,04:30   

"I feel deeply sorry for the victims and their friends and families."

Me too.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
REC



Posts: 638
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,09:19   

Quote (The whole truth @ July 21 2012,03:47)
Quote (didymos @ July 21 2012,00:27)
Quote (BillB @ July 20 2012,23:45)
Anyone care to place bets on whick UD regular will be first to blame the cinema shootings on Darwin?

Barrogant.  He's always gotten a ghoulish delight out of these things. Plus, it happened in Colorado.

You're likely right, although it wouldn't surprise me if o'leary beats him to it. And of course mullings will chime in at some point and blame it on "Darwinism", methodological naturalism, evolutionary materialism, and the 'de-christianization' of the USA.

I'm sure that arrington is also thinking of how to make money off the situation by suing somebody. He probably rushed to the scene, chased the ambulances, and handed out his business card to the survivors.

I'm sure Barry is looking for something to thrust him back into the limelight. Going from Columbine lawyer to sleazy debt-collection agency has to hurt....

Quote
Barry K. Arrington Law Office is currently seeking a Full-time collector/skip tracer. ....
$9/hr ...
Qualifications:
Must be at least 18 yrs old
Link

Quote
Turns out they say I owe a loan I paid off in 2010--basically twice as much as the original loan. It is from some attorney BARRY K. ARRINGTON LAW OFFICE .   ...  

I received a call twice and was told that if I don't respond they will assume I am NOT cooperating and will press charges

I have contacted an Alaskan attorney since I paid this debt off. They have been harrassing me at work and I sent a letter to discontinue under the Fair Debt Collection Act.  They still call every day regardless.
Link

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,10:40   



--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,12:20   

Quote (REC @ July 21 2012,09:19)
 
Quote
They have been harrassing me at work and I sent a letter to discontinue under the Fair Debt Collection Act.  They still call every day regardless.
Link

I've read it can be big $$ for you if they break the rules, like $X for every violation.

So keep callin Barry, keep callin...

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,12:42   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ July 21 2012,12:20)
Quote (REC @ July 21 2012,09:19)
 
Quote
They have been harrassing me at work and I sent a letter to discontinue under the Fair Debt Collection Act.  They still call every day regardless.
Link

I've read it can be big $$ for you if they break the rules, like $X for every violation.

So keep callin Barry, keep callin...

How many do we need for a class action lawsuit?

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,12:47   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ July 21 2012,12:20)
Quote (REC @ July 21 2012,09:19)
 
Quote
They have been harrassing me at work and I sent a letter to discontinue under the Fair Debt Collection Act.  They still call every day regardless.
Link

I've read it can be big $$ for you if they break the rules, like $X for every violation.

So keep callin Barry, keep callin...

Dealing with this is not fun, but you're right.  It's $1,000 for every violation.

Every time they call after a written request not to = $1,000
If they put the debt on a credit report after evidence of a paid-off amount has been provided = $1,000
There are a couple of other things, each worth a $1,000  fee for breaking the law.

When the fair credit reporting act came into play, there were a bunch of people who made a profit off the 'old-school' debt collection agencies by taking them to small claims court every time they called.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,13:10   

Poor PaV, so deluded...
 
Quote
It appears, in fact, that the conclusion reached by almost everyone who has ever studied Natural Selection, is confirmed by this study: NS eliminates deleterious mutations. It has almost NO ability to bring about positive changes (in conformity with Michael Behe’s latest peer-reviewed article last year.)

So much for Darwinism. May we be soon rid of its foolishness.

 
Quote
Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.

 
Quote
But, when positive selection is thrown out, so, too, is Darwinism.
 
Quote
In the paper they talk about the transfer of information.

You see, they can’t explain the origin of information.

 
Quote
As jstanley01 humorously points out, it’s time to play “taps” for Darwinism. It’s all over except for the shouting. Finis. Over and out. Sayonara.

Yes indeed. Except that "you see, they can’t explain the origin of information" sounds like what the madman shouts when he kinda sounds like he's almost making sense.

Tell me PaV, how does ID "explain" the "origin of information"? Or you could just pick anything at all and tell me how ID explains it? Your choice.

Oh, that's right.....

duh.

Edited by oldmanintheskydidntdoit on July 21 2012,13:11

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Kattarina98



Posts: 1267
Joined: Sep. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,14:11   

I always thought scientists are the girls and guys who do research in the lab or in the field or do really difficult stuff with computers. However, says KF:
Quote
Pardon, but could you address the pivotal question for us scientist types ...


--------------
Barry Arrington is a bitch.

  
OgreMkV



Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,14:24   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ July 21 2012,14:11)
I always thought scientists are the girls and guys who do research in the lab or in the field or do really difficult stuff with computers. However, says KF:  
Quote
Pardon, but could you address the pivotal question for us scientist types ...

He's using "types" the same way he would use "kinds".

In this case, "scientists" includes politicians, lawyers, engineers, computer programmers, bloggers, petty bureaucrats, and Mr. Leathers.

--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.

http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat

   
olegt



Posts: 1405
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,19:21   

Steve Fuller shows up at UD to stir up the nest.
Quote

ID is clearly a very complex thing and there is a wide variety of views on how it should develop. Yes, I strongly believe that theology is integral to the distinctiveness of ID as a SCIENTIFIC research programme. Anyone who finds this idea preposterous (as opposed to simply wrong) really should be a theistic evolutionist or perhaps just an evolutionist. ID is the place where the science-theology nexus is taken seriously as an intellectual project, and is in fact what makes ID an exciting research orientation.

[...]

Finally, whatever you think of my views on ID, you need to get away from the idea that ID can be a science of ‘design detection’ simpliciter. That’s about as much of a science as butterfly collecting. A science worth taking seriously needs a research programme that aims to extend its leading explanatory principles by testing them against new bodies of evidence. This is where specifying the ‘intelligence’ behind the design becomes important. As virtually everyone here admits, the relevant sense of ‘intelligence’ is based initially on human intelligence. But why should our intelligence be taken as a guide to intelligence in things we had nothing to do with creating? Well, this is where the imago dei doctrine comes in. In fact, I can’t see how you could justify using intelligence as a principle for explaining natural order otherwise.

It should be fun watching the perps deny the obvious.

--------------
If you are not:
Galapagos Finch
please Logout »

  
NormOlsen



Posts: 104
Joined: Nov. 2011

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,19:44   

Quote
But why should our intelligence be taken as a guide to intelligence in things we had nothing to do with creating? Well, this is where the imago dei doctrine comes in.


Simply awesome.  He basically gives away the farm here.  Oh this is going to be fun!

  
olegt



Posts: 1405
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,20:17   

Fuller deserves a Darwin Award for his tireless work on undressing ID and revealing the good ole creationism under the cheap tuxedo.

The Fuller–Meyer debacle has sent a shock wave through UD inducing some spectacular ejaculations from ID fans with half a brain or more. Timaeus couldn't quite believe his eyes and, after urging caution, made this frank admission:
Quote

I support ID because I think it has something true to say about nature — that living systems did not arise by Darwinian means [...] I’m not in this to join a moral crusade to revivify the soul of America, or anything of that sort. I’m in this to show that neo-Darwinism is bad biological science and that its defense has largely rested on metaphysical assumptions about nature and epistemological assumptions about human knowledge, rather than good empirical research. I’m in this to show that apparent design — which Dawkins grants — is real design. And I’m in this to take arrogant biologists and their arrogant philosopher-allies and their arrogant internet groupies down a peg, and show that their reductionist view of nature is based more on their macho anti-religion than on anything to do with the facts revealed by natural science.

So much for the protestations that ID is not simply an argument against evolution.

--------------
If you are not:
Galapagos Finch
please Logout »

  
olegt



Posts: 1405
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,20:56   

Gil says darndest things.
Quote
[Quoting Joe G]: The main problem with simulations is that you cannot simulate what you do not understand. And that is where evolution comes in- no one understands it so no one can simulate it.

Amen raised to the Xth power, where X is large. Joe’s comment encapsulates the essence of my thesis, expressed with far fewer words and much more eloquently.

That alone cracked me up. Joe Gallien, the paragon of eloquence!

And here is a bonus, in case you forgot how smart Gil is:
Quote
I’ve always been a detail guy — whether learning, memorizing, and performing every single note in an 80-page piano score of a Rachmaninoff piano concerto, or writing complex computer programs — but immersion in detail can deceive one into not being aware of the overarching theme.


But enough about me! Time to dump on the evilutionists:
Quote
Darwinists are hopelessly lost in the speculative details of their theory, which they must propose and defend at any cost — forget reason or evidence — because to do otherwise would be to admit that their materialistic worldview is indefensible and that design is evident.


And now back to our regular programming:
Quote
The reason I make my posts at UD is that I was once in the Darwinist camp. I was thoroughly indoctrinated with Darwinian argumentation from childhood, through college, and beyond.

But then one day I was exposed to rational argumentation and evidence that convinced me that I had been deceived, and that Darwinism was never about science, but about a long-awaited creation myth for a materialistic, nihilistic religion.


We LOVE you, Gil! We cherish every word you write about yourself.

--------------
If you are not:
Galapagos Finch
please Logout »

  
Woodbine



Posts: 1218
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 21 2012,22:59   

Quote
I’ve always been a detail guy — whether learning, memorizing, and performing every single note in an 80-page piano score of a Rachmaninoff piano concerto, or writing complex computer programs — but immersion in detail can deceive one into not being aware of the overarching theme.


He must be mentally ill. Seriously.

I've ran into some weird folk on the internet - we all have. But i've never encountered anyone so desperately narcissistic and hopelessly insecure as Gildo. And his endless repetition indicates a problem so deeply ingrained it can't possibly remain confined to his online scribblings.

Thus, Gil's pathology must be as readily apparent in real life as it is on the internet. Can you imagine knowing this bloke? Working with him? Being married to him?

Fuck...... :(

  
fnxtr



Posts: 3504
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 22 2012,01:20   

Quote (Woodbine @ July 21 2012,20:59)
Quote
I’ve always been a detail guy — whether learning, memorizing, and performing every single note in an 80-page piano score of a Rachmaninoff piano concerto, or writing complex computer programs — but immersion in detail can deceive one into not being aware of the overarching theme.


He must be mentally ill. Seriously.

I've ran into some weird folk on the internet - we all have. But i've never encountered anyone so desperately narcissistic and hopelessly insecure as Gildo. And his endless repetition indicates a problem so deeply ingrained it can't possibly remain confined to his online scribblings.

Thus, Gil's pathology must be as readily apparent in real life as it is on the internet. Can you imagine knowing this bloke? Working with him? Being married to him?

Fuck...... :(

Hey, Gil, here's a hint:

If you really were brilliant, you wouldn't have to keep telling everyone.

Just sayin'.

--------------
"[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory

"Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: July 22 2012,04:10   

Gil is describing Aspergers, a condition that probably augments his abilities in the activities he lists.

It also leaves him socially clueless.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: July 22 2012,04:11   

Quote (Kattarina98 @ July 21 2012,12:11)
I always thought scientists are the girls and guys who do research in the lab or in the field or do really difficult stuff with computers. However, says KF:        
Quote
Pardon, but could you address the pivotal question for us scientist types ...

How about some examples of gordo the scientist type:


"Indeed, it was theistically inspired belief that our minds and senses were made by a benevolent God to function in a world that reflects the orderly mind of that Creator that gave men confidence to embark on use of the inductive method to identify empirically what were the patterns put into the world by the Creator."



"In particular, it is indeed he consensus of scholarship that the Bible text is pretty reliable as to the originals."



"the key authenticating argumentr for that faith is the resurrection of Jesus with 500+ witnesses, some 20+ of which we have identities for. And the Spirit poured out gives life ot the promises int eh Scriptures so that there are millions of witnesses to meeting God in the face of Jesus."



"There ARE angels who are glad to accept worship: fallen angels, i.e devils or demons.

Historic, authentic, NT-based Christianity is clear on the matter: as the angel of Rev 22 says — WORSHIP GOD!"



"And, remember just what you are mucking around with when you start to play footsie with pagan gods.

[And on this subject the real authority is Jesus of Nazareth; the risen Christ. he took demons very seriously and he has the resurrection from the dead with 500+ witnesses to prove that he know what he was talking about. Acts 19:8-20]

PPS: My recommendation is that you go find yourself a solid pastor who knows what he is dealing with, if you have been playing footsie with pagan gods. No joke!"



"On Judaeo-Christian monotheism [theism for short], the morally virtuous Creator-God is the IS who grounds OUGHT in his character."



"the Bible is in major respects — both OT and NT — historical record, and abundantly confirmed as good record too."



"On the strength of that historical record and resulting supernatural power that is present and active all around us on the terms of the promises of the Scriptures, we know or should know that Jesus of Nazareth is Lord of life, Lord of Death, Light of the World, reason Himself, the Way, the Truth and the Life."



"For, God is gracious and has given us many points of evidence whereby we may see just how credible and authentic — thus trustworthy and authoritative (even as as a top class dictionary is trustworthy and authoritative) — is the witness of the Scriptures, NT and OT."



"As we turn to the OT, it is worth noting again that we have some rather direct authentication in hand, from the Lord of truth Himself.

23 –> And, on the single most contested teaching in our era of secular humanist evolutionary materialism, Creation, it is worth pausing to hear God out of the storm in Job 38:

   38:1 Then the Lord answered Job out of the whirlwind:2

   38:2 “Who is this3 who darkens counsel4 with words without knowledge?

   38:3 Get ready for a difficult task5 like a man; I will question you and you will inform me!

   38:4 “Where were you when I laid the foundation6 of the earth?

   Tell me,7 if you possess understanding!

   38:5 Who set its measurements – if8 you know – or who stretched a measuring line across it?

   38:6 On what9 were its bases10 set, or who laid its cornerstone – 38:7 when the morning stars11 sang12 in chorus,13 and all the sons of God14 shouted for joy? . . .

24 –> So, we should not be unduly overawed by Nat Geog sagas on TV, or by Dawkinsian village atheist rhetoric railing against God our Creator, or bones in museums or the many misleading icons of macro-evolution, or by “dating” technologies [you should see how isochrons -- the star technique -- can give misleading results!] or by various cosmological speculations.

25 –> For, these are at best stories made up by men to model the unobserved, unobservable past as they imagine it might have been, not indisputable truth based on direct observation, knowledge and record of the deep past of origins.

26 –> And remember the embarrassed silence when the implications of the observations we can make were brought out: in the cell and in the heavens and even the models such as the Big Bang, that the cosmos and life are the product of intelligence.

27 –> But also, yesterday, I put up a useful summary slide show, by Hugenberger; which shows case after case where skeptical dismissals of the OT record run up against subtle clues and subsequent discoveries."



"32 –> It is against this backdrop of (a) enslavement and (b) attempted genocide, that when Moshe is born, he is hid in the house until he has to be put in the famous basket in the river set up just where the princess is likely to come for ablutions, with big sister Miriam watching from a strategic spot.

33 –> The princess, who plainly knows just what is going on, adopts the boy [Take that, daddy-o! You got a Hebrew grandson now! Pow!], and makes the birth mother into his wet nurse and nanny. (In short, right in the king’s household, there is opposition to the genocide. And genocide is inherently plausible as absolute kings tend to be very corrupt. indeed, event he wonderful monuments and art, from a different perspective, reflect long term exploitation of the peasantry.)

34 –> The rest is history: Moses rises to be a prince of Egypt, mighty in word and deed, but then becomes a murderer and felon in exile on the backside of the desert, for 40 years; when he kills an Egyptian beating up on an Israelite. (It is when the king and those who sought him die, that he returns and becomes the famous liberator; tempered by in effect a life sentence of exile.)

35 –> I have already noted and linked on how the hard hearted response of the King of Egypt sets up a power confrontation between YHWH the liberating Creator-God and the demon-backed magicians and mythological gods of Egypt, listing specific gods [and demons] bested by each plague in turn, culminating in the living god, the Pharaoh.

36 –> In that cultural context, the visible contest was the reflection of a war of the territorial gods — note how in the prophets Satan himself is prince of Tyre, Michael the fighting archangel is prince of Israel, and there are princes of Persia and Greece! [Let us hope the prince of Barbados is one of the good guys!] — and YHWH plainly bests the pantheon of Egypt without breaking a sweat.

37 –> Against that backdrop, genesis is a cosmology that sets the real record straight on origins, and in so doing just happens to lay out a unique ground of existence in the Morally upright Creator God who provides an IS that is an adequate foundation for OUGHT.

38 –> In fact, the ONLY philosophically adequate foundation for ought. “What a coincidence!” [NOT.]


So, we have now laid out a framework for the authenticity of the Scriptures, anchored in the resurrection of Jesus, but with ample corroboration and a system for understanding why we can trust the record.

That is important in an ate where just as peter predicted in 65 AD or so, mockers would come, dismissing the testimony of the said scriptures.

But, only to their own self-deception and the misleading of those unwise enough to take them seriously.

“A word to the wise . . . ”"



"And, Jesus’ resurrection did in fact place him in the land of the living to the point where he was hugged by women, he walked miles with men on the road to Emmaus, ate a fish supper with his disciples, and even later made breakfast for them on the shores of the sea of Galilee. Jesus’ resurrection body is transformed, but it is fully capable of operating in this world!

he is no mummified green-coloured pagan god of the underworld."



"We are the children of the ONLY Living God and Father!"



"Our loving Heavenly Father listens to us."



"Jesus was buried in a specific tomb prepared by Joseph of Arimathea for his own burial, and just north of the city gates of Jerusalem.

–. on the followinfg sunday mornintg, women went, not to search, but to anoint the body with spices.

–> but as they arrived the tomb was already opened, and the one formerly within had long since risen!"



"Satan has no power to win against God, and was decisively beaten at Calvary: “IT IS FINISHED!”"




All science so far!

ID isn't creationism or religious in any way!

gordo is interested only in the 'science' of evolution and origins, not religious creationist fairytales. He's a scientist type!


Most of that stuff above is from this thread, where gordo posts with the username "Dictionary". Read that thread if you want to see some of gordo's religious zealotry. There are some other threads there with gordo's lies, preaching, and sanctimonious insanity in them.

Don't forget that gordo has said that "any command" by "God" is a "good command", and he says that the bible, both OT and NT, are "abundantly confirmed as good record". In the bible the "God" that gordo chooses to worship and promote commanded or carried out massive murders (genocide), destruction, plagues, sacrifices, suffering, etc., etc., etc. Yep, that's the "God" that gordo says his morals are grounded in. No wonder gordo has no morals.

gordo also supports wl craig's lame justifications for genocide.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: July 22 2012,04:15   

The Fuller plan would instantly disqualify ID from classroom inclusion. And that in turn would dry up funding sources. So I expect a lively debate within the big tent, and possibly some bloodletting.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: July 22 2012,04:38   

Quote (Woodbine @ July 21 2012,20:59)
Quote
I’ve always been a detail guy — whether learning, memorizing, and performing every single note in an 80-page piano score of a Rachmaninoff piano concerto, or writing complex computer programs — but immersion in detail can deceive one into not being aware of the overarching theme.


He must be mentally ill. Seriously.

I've ran into some weird folk on the internet - we all have. But i've never encountered anyone so desperately narcissistic and hopelessly insecure as Gildo. And his endless repetition indicates a problem so deeply ingrained it can't possibly remain confined to his online scribblings.

Thus, Gil's pathology must be as readily apparent in real life as it is on the internet. Can you imagine knowing this bloke? Working with him? Being married to him?

Fuck...... :(

"Can you imagine knowing this bloke? Working with him? Being married to him?"

The first two I can sort of imagine, and it makes me feel nauseous. The last one, well, that's just cruel. ;)

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
Quack



Posts: 1961
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: July 22 2012,06:23   

Quote
And I’m in this to take arrogant biologists and their arrogant philosopher-allies and their arrogant internet groupies down a peg, and show that their reductionist view of nature is based more on their macho anti-religion than on anything to do with the facts revealed by natural science.


Arrogance? ID is founded on arrogant rejection of science.

WRT reductionism, I cant think of anything more like reductio ad absurdum than ID.

It looks to me as if during the short but tough life of the intelligent design movement, science has moved on from reductionism to the age of complexity and intrinsic organizational forces at work in nature.

--------------
Rocks have no biology.
              Robert Byers.

  
  10669 replies since Aug. 31 2011,21:06 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (356) < ... 172 173 174 175 176 [177] 178 179 180 181 182 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]