Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > Joe G.'s Tardgasm

Pages: (919) < ... 418 419 420 421 422 [423] 424 425 426 427 428 ... >

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,09:42    Can anyone find any valid references that say tree rings are a code? Anyone? -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,09:44    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:40)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:34)       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:27) Dumbass- I said that SCIENCE, all OBSERVATIONs and all EXPERIMENTs support baraminology. And as usual you choked on it because you are an ignorant asshole. How does the overall phylogenetic tree created from the genetic record support baraminology Chubs?         Quote Tree of Life Reveals Clock-Like Speciation and Diversification Abstract:  Genomic data are rapidly resolving the tree of living species calibrated to time, the timetree of life, which will provide a framework for research in diverse fields of science. Previous analyses of taxonomically restricted timetrees have found a decline in the rate of diversification in many groups of organisms, often attributed to ecological interactions among species. Here, we have synthesized a global timetree of life from 2,274 studies representing 50,632 species and examined the pattern and rate of diversification as well as the timing of speciation. We found that species diversity has been mostly expanding overall and in many smaller groups of species, and that the rate of diversification in eukaryotes has been mostly constant. We also identified, and avoided, potential biases that may have influenced previous analyses of diversification including low levels of taxon sampling, small clade size, and the inclusion of stem branches in clade analyses. We found consistency in time-to-speciation among plants and animals, ∼2 My, as measured by intervals of crown and stem species times. Together, this clock-like change at different levels suggests that speciation and diversification are processes dominated by random events and that adaptive change is largely a separate process. Get off your fat ass and provide some evidence for once. How does it provide evidence for blind watchmaker evolution? How does it provide evidence for Common Descent? Phylogenetic trees are based on similarities. Similarities come from a Common Design. Only an imbecile would think that the differences in the same genes that code for the same proteins, that do the same function is evidence for Common Descent. Common Descent doesn't have anything to account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two alleged related species like humans and chimps. And then there is the problem of getting past bacteria. You still don't have a mechanism capable of doing so. You're suppose to show how this phylogenetic data supports baraminology.  You're the moron who claimed ALL scientific observations support baraminology, remember? Of course you can't.  All your fat ass can do is regurgitate the usual off topic IDiot talking points. What a sad dumbass you are.   -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,09:49    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:42) Can anyone find any valid references that say tree rings are a code? Anyone? Christ you're a dumbass   Quote Picture Climate: How Can We Learn from Tree Rings? Scientists use microscopes to examine the cores and take very precise measurements of the ring widths and cell density characteristics because each ring is a signal of year-to-year climate variability. Depending on their location and type, the trees can describe precipitation or temperature conditions. Trees that depend heavily on temperature in the growing season will have narrow rings during cold periods and wider rings for warm periods. Trees that depend heavily on moisture during the growing season will have wider rings during rainy periods and narrower rings during dry periods. Dumbass. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,09:51    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:49) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:42) Can anyone find any valid references that say tree rings are a code? Anyone? Christ you're a dumbass     Quote Picture Climate: How Can We Learn from Tree Rings? Scientists use microscopes to examine the cores and take very precise measurements of the ring widths and cell density characteristics because each ring is a signal of year-to-year climate variability. Depending on their location and type, the trees can describe precipitation or temperature conditions. Trees that depend heavily on temperature in the growing season will have narrow rings during cold periods and wider rings for warm periods. Trees that depend heavily on moisture during the growing season will have wider rings during rainy periods and narrower rings during dry periods. Dumbass. It does not say that tree rings are a code. You must be one ignorant asshole. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,09:52    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:44) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:40)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:34)       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:27) Dumbass- I said that SCIENCE, all OBSERVATIONs and all EXPERIMENTs support baraminology. And as usual you choked on it because you are an ignorant asshole. How does the overall phylogenetic tree created from the genetic record support baraminology Chubs?         Quote Tree of Life Reveals Clock-Like Speciation and Diversification Abstract:  Genomic data are rapidly resolving the tree of living species calibrated to time, the timetree of life, which will provide a framework for research in diverse fields of science. Previous analyses of taxonomically restricted timetrees have found a decline in the rate of diversification in many groups of organisms, often attributed to ecological interactions among species. Here, we have synthesized a global timetree of life from 2,274 studies representing 50,632 species and examined the pattern and rate of diversification as well as the timing of speciation. We found that species diversity has been mostly expanding overall and in many smaller groups of species, and that the rate of diversification in eukaryotes has been mostly constant. We also identified, and avoided, potential biases that may have influenced previous analyses of diversification including low levels of taxon sampling, small clade size, and the inclusion of stem branches in clade analyses. We found consistency in time-to-speciation among plants and animals, ∼2 My, as measured by intervals of crown and stem species times. Together, this clock-like change at different levels suggests that speciation and diversification are processes dominated by random events and that adaptive change is largely a separate process. Get off your fat ass and provide some evidence for once. How does it provide evidence for blind watchmaker evolution? How does it provide evidence for Common Descent? Phylogenetic trees are based on similarities. Similarities come from a Common Design. Only an imbecile would think that the differences in the same genes that code for the same proteins, that do the same function is evidence for Common Descent. Common Descent doesn't have anything to account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two alleged related species like humans and chimps. And then there is the problem of getting past bacteria. You still don't have a mechanism capable of doing so. You're suppose to show how this phylogenetic data supports baraminology.  You're the moron who claimed ALL scientific observations support baraminology, remember? Of course you can't.  All your fat ass can do is regurgitate the usual off topic IDiot talking points. What a sad dumbass you are.   :D Common Design. Phylogenetic trees show the degree of the Common Design between any organisms. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,09:55    Can anyone find any valid references that say tree rings are a code? Anyone? -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,09:58    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:52)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:44)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:40)         Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:34)           Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:27) Dumbass- I said that SCIENCE, all OBSERVATIONs and all EXPERIMENTs support baraminology. And as usual you choked on it because you are an ignorant asshole. How does the overall phylogenetic tree created from the genetic record support baraminology Chubs?             Quote Tree of Life Reveals Clock-Like Speciation and Diversification Abstract:  Genomic data are rapidly resolving the tree of living species calibrated to time, the timetree of life, which will provide a framework for research in diverse fields of science. Previous analyses of taxonomically restricted timetrees have found a decline in the rate of diversification in many groups of organisms, often attributed to ecological interactions among species. Here, we have synthesized a global timetree of life from 2,274 studies representing 50,632 species and examined the pattern and rate of diversification as well as the timing of speciation. We found that species diversity has been mostly expanding overall and in many smaller groups of species, and that the rate of diversification in eukaryotes has been mostly constant. We also identified, and avoided, potential biases that may have influenced previous analyses of diversification including low levels of taxon sampling, small clade size, and the inclusion of stem branches in clade analyses. We found consistency in time-to-speciation among plants and animals, ∼2 My, as measured by intervals of crown and stem species times. Together, this clock-like change at different levels suggests that speciation and diversification are processes dominated by random events and that adaptive change is largely a separate process. Get off your fat ass and provide some evidence for once. How does it provide evidence for blind watchmaker evolution? How does it provide evidence for Common Descent? Phylogenetic trees are based on similarities. Similarities come from a Common Design. Only an imbecile would think that the differences in the same genes that code for the same proteins, that do the same function is evidence for Common Descent. Common Descent doesn't have anything to account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two alleged related species like humans and chimps. And then there is the problem of getting past bacteria. You still don't have a mechanism capable of doing so. You're suppose to show how this phylogenetic data supports baraminology.  You're the moron who claimed ALL scientific observations support baraminology, remember? Of course you can't.  All your fat ass can do is regurgitate the usual off topic IDiot talking points. What a sad dumbass you are.   Common Design. Phylogenetic trees show the degree of the Common Design between any organisms. But how does that support baraminology dumbass? Is all life one big created "kind"? Dumbass. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:00    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:55) Can anyone find any valid references that say tree rings are a code? Anyone? Hah!  Watch Chubs waddle away from the data already provided.   -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:00    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:58) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:52)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:44)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:40)           Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:34)           Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:27) Dumbass- I said that SCIENCE, all OBSERVATIONs and all EXPERIMENTs support baraminology. And as usual you choked on it because you are an ignorant asshole. How does the overall phylogenetic tree created from the genetic record support baraminology Chubs?             Quote Tree of Life Reveals Clock-Like Speciation and Diversification Abstract:  Genomic data are rapidly resolving the tree of living species calibrated to time, the timetree of life, which will provide a framework for research in diverse fields of science. Previous analyses of taxonomically restricted timetrees have found a decline in the rate of diversification in many groups of organisms, often attributed to ecological interactions among species. Here, we have synthesized a global timetree of life from 2,274 studies representing 50,632 species and examined the pattern and rate of diversification as well as the timing of speciation. We found that species diversity has been mostly expanding overall and in many smaller groups of species, and that the rate of diversification in eukaryotes has been mostly constant. We also identified, and avoided, potential biases that may have influenced previous analyses of diversification including low levels of taxon sampling, small clade size, and the inclusion of stem branches in clade analyses. We found consistency in time-to-speciation among plants and animals, ∼2 My, as measured by intervals of crown and stem species times. Together, this clock-like change at different levels suggests that speciation and diversification are processes dominated by random events and that adaptive change is largely a separate process. Get off your fat ass and provide some evidence for once. How does it provide evidence for blind watchmaker evolution? How does it provide evidence for Common Descent? Phylogenetic trees are based on similarities. Similarities come from a Common Design. Only an imbecile would think that the differences in the same genes that code for the same proteins, that do the same function is evidence for Common Descent. Common Descent doesn't have anything to account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two alleged related species like humans and chimps. And then there is the problem of getting past bacteria. You still don't have a mechanism capable of doing so. You're suppose to show how this phylogenetic data supports baraminology.  You're the moron who claimed ALL scientific observations support baraminology, remember? Of course you can't.  All your fat ass can do is regurgitate the usual off topic IDiot talking points. What a sad dumbass you are.   :D Common Design. Phylogenetic trees show the degree of the Common Design between any organisms. But how does that support baraminology dumbass? Is all life one big created "kind"? Dumbass. Linnaean Taxonomy is based on a Common Design and represents baraminology. The tree doesn't show any evidence for Common Descent. The tree doesn't show any evidence for blind watchmaker evolution. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:01    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:00) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:55) Can anyone find any valid references that say tree rings are a code? Anyone? Hah!  Watch Chubs waddle away fro the data provided.   :D You didn't provide any references that say tree rings are a code, let alone a valid reference. Are you really that desperate and ignorant, timmy? Really? -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:01    Can anyone find any valid references that say tree rings are a code? Anyone? -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:03    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:00)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:58)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:52)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:44)       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:40)             Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:34)               Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:27) Dumbass- I said that SCIENCE, all OBSERVATIONs and all EXPERIMENTs support baraminology. And as usual you choked on it because you are an ignorant asshole. How does the overall phylogenetic tree created from the genetic record support baraminology Chubs?                 Quote Tree of Life Reveals Clock-Like Speciation and Diversification Abstract:  Genomic data are rapidly resolving the tree of living species calibrated to time, the timetree of life, which will provide a framework for research in diverse fields of science. Previous analyses of taxonomically restricted timetrees have found a decline in the rate of diversification in many groups of organisms, often attributed to ecological interactions among species. Here, we have synthesized a global timetree of life from 2,274 studies representing 50,632 species and examined the pattern and rate of diversification as well as the timing of speciation. We found that species diversity has been mostly expanding overall and in many smaller groups of species, and that the rate of diversification in eukaryotes has been mostly constant. We also identified, and avoided, potential biases that may have influenced previous analyses of diversification including low levels of taxon sampling, small clade size, and the inclusion of stem branches in clade analyses. We found consistency in time-to-speciation among plants and animals, ∼2 My, as measured by intervals of crown and stem species times. Together, this clock-like change at different levels suggests that speciation and diversification are processes dominated by random events and that adaptive change is largely a separate process. Get off your fat ass and provide some evidence for once. How does it provide evidence for blind watchmaker evolution? How does it provide evidence for Common Descent? Phylogenetic trees are based on similarities. Similarities come from a Common Design. Only an imbecile would think that the differences in the same genes that code for the same proteins, that do the same function is evidence for Common Descent. Common Descent doesn't have anything to account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two alleged related species like humans and chimps. And then there is the problem of getting past bacteria. You still don't have a mechanism capable of doing so. You're suppose to show how this phylogenetic data supports baraminology.  You're the moron who claimed ALL scientific observations support baraminology, remember? Of course you can't.  All your fat ass can do is regurgitate the usual off topic IDiot talking points. What a sad dumbass you are.   Common Design. Phylogenetic trees show the degree of the Common Design between any organisms. But how does that support baraminology dumbass? Is all life one big created "kind"? Dumbass. Linnaean Taxonomy is based on a Common Design and represents baraminology. HOW dumbass?   Don't just keep claiming it, show it in the data. Where in the data are the created "kinds"? Chubby dumbass. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:03    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:01) Can anyone find any valid references that say tree rings are a code? Anyone? Waddle away from the data already presented Joke, faster!   -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:04    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:03) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:00)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:58)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:52)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:44)         Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:40)               Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:34)               Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:27) Dumbass- I said that SCIENCE, all OBSERVATIONs and all EXPERIMENTs support baraminology. And as usual you choked on it because you are an ignorant asshole. How does the overall phylogenetic tree created from the genetic record support baraminology Chubs?                 Quote Tree of Life Reveals Clock-Like Speciation and Diversification Abstract:  Genomic data are rapidly resolving the tree of living species calibrated to time, the timetree of life, which will provide a framework for research in diverse fields of science. Previous analyses of taxonomically restricted timetrees have found a decline in the rate of diversification in many groups of organisms, often attributed to ecological interactions among species. Here, we have synthesized a global timetree of life from 2,274 studies representing 50,632 species and examined the pattern and rate of diversification as well as the timing of speciation. We found that species diversity has been mostly expanding overall and in many smaller groups of species, and that the rate of diversification in eukaryotes has been mostly constant. We also identified, and avoided, potential biases that may have influenced previous analyses of diversification including low levels of taxon sampling, small clade size, and the inclusion of stem branches in clade analyses. We found consistency in time-to-speciation among plants and animals, ∼2 My, as measured by intervals of crown and stem species times. Together, this clock-like change at different levels suggests that speciation and diversification are processes dominated by random events and that adaptive change is largely a separate process. Get off your fat ass and provide some evidence for once. How does it provide evidence for blind watchmaker evolution? How does it provide evidence for Common Descent? Phylogenetic trees are based on similarities. Similarities come from a Common Design. Only an imbecile would think that the differences in the same genes that code for the same proteins, that do the same function is evidence for Common Descent. Common Descent doesn't have anything to account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two alleged related species like humans and chimps. And then there is the problem of getting past bacteria. You still don't have a mechanism capable of doing so. You're suppose to show how this phylogenetic data supports baraminology.  You're the moron who claimed ALL scientific observations support baraminology, remember? Of course you can't.  All your fat ass can do is regurgitate the usual off topic IDiot talking points. What a sad dumbass you are.   :D Common Design. Phylogenetic trees show the degree of the Common Design between any organisms. But how does that support baraminology dumbass? Is all life one big created "kind"? Dumbass. Linnaean Taxonomy is based on a Common Design and represents baraminology. HOW dumbass?   Don't just keep claiming it, show it in the data. Where in the data are the created "kinds"? Chubby dumbass. It is a made up, question-begging tree of life. There isn't any science behind it, dumbass. My claim pertains to science, actual observations and actual experiments. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:04    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:03) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:01) Can anyone find any valid references that say tree rings are a code? Anyone? Waddle away from the data already presented Joke, faster!   :D There isn't anything in what you have posted that says tree rings are a code. Clearly you are just a deluded asshole. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:05    Can anyone find any valid references that say tree rings are a code? Anyone? timmy has FAILed, miserably. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:07    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:04)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:03)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:00)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:58)       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:52)           Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:44)           Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:40)                 Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:34)                   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:27) Dumbass- I said that SCIENCE, all OBSERVATIONs and all EXPERIMENTs support baraminology. And as usual you choked on it because you are an ignorant asshole. How does the overall phylogenetic tree created from the genetic record support baraminology Chubs?                     Quote Tree of Life Reveals Clock-Like Speciation and Diversification Abstract:  Genomic data are rapidly resolving the tree of living species calibrated to time, the timetree of life, which will provide a framework for research in diverse fields of science. Previous analyses of taxonomically restricted timetrees have found a decline in the rate of diversification in many groups of organisms, often attributed to ecological interactions among species. Here, we have synthesized a global timetree of life from 2,274 studies representing 50,632 species and examined the pattern and rate of diversification as well as the timing of speciation. We found that species diversity has been mostly expanding overall and in many smaller groups of species, and that the rate of diversification in eukaryotes has been mostly constant. We also identified, and avoided, potential biases that may have influenced previous analyses of diversification including low levels of taxon sampling, small clade size, and the inclusion of stem branches in clade analyses. We found consistency in time-to-speciation among plants and animals, ∼2 My, as measured by intervals of crown and stem species times. Together, this clock-like change at different levels suggests that speciation and diversification are processes dominated by random events and that adaptive change is largely a separate process. Get off your fat ass and provide some evidence for once. How does it provide evidence for blind watchmaker evolution? How does it provide evidence for Common Descent? Phylogenetic trees are based on similarities. Similarities come from a Common Design. Only an imbecile would think that the differences in the same genes that code for the same proteins, that do the same function is evidence for Common Descent. Common Descent doesn't have anything to account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two alleged related species like humans and chimps. And then there is the problem of getting past bacteria. You still don't have a mechanism capable of doing so. You're suppose to show how this phylogenetic data supports baraminology.  You're the moron who claimed ALL scientific observations support baraminology, remember? Of course you can't.  All your fat ass can do is regurgitate the usual off topic IDiot talking points. What a sad dumbass you are.   Common Design. Phylogenetic trees show the degree of the Common Design between any organisms. But how does that support baraminology dumbass? Is all life one big created "kind"? Dumbass. Linnaean Taxonomy is based on a Common Design and represents baraminology. HOW dumbass?   Don't just keep claiming it, show it in the data. Where in the data are the created "kinds"? Chubby dumbass. It is a made up, question-begging tree of life. There isn't any science behind it, dumbass. My claim pertains to science, actual observations and actual experiments. As expected, chubby Joke can't back up his "baraminology" claim.   Joke runs his mouth, runs from the genetic data.  Just like always. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:08    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:07) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:04)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:03)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:00)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:58)         Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:52)           Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:44)             Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:40)                   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:34)                   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:27) Dumbass- I said that SCIENCE, all OBSERVATIONs and all EXPERIMENTs support baraminology. And as usual you choked on it because you are an ignorant asshole. How does the overall phylogenetic tree created from the genetic record support baraminology Chubs?                     Quote Tree of Life Reveals Clock-Like Speciation and Diversification Abstract:  Genomic data are rapidly resolving the tree of living species calibrated to time, the timetree of life, which will provide a framework for research in diverse fields of science. Previous analyses of taxonomically restricted timetrees have found a decline in the rate of diversification in many groups of organisms, often attributed to ecological interactions among species. Here, we have synthesized a global timetree of life from 2,274 studies representing 50,632 species and examined the pattern and rate of diversification as well as the timing of speciation. We found that species diversity has been mostly expanding overall and in many smaller groups of species, and that the rate of diversification in eukaryotes has been mostly constant. We also identified, and avoided, potential biases that may have influenced previous analyses of diversification including low levels of taxon sampling, small clade size, and the inclusion of stem branches in clade analyses. We found consistency in time-to-speciation among plants and animals, ∼2 My, as measured by intervals of crown and stem species times. Together, this clock-like change at different levels suggests that speciation and diversification are processes dominated by random events and that adaptive change is largely a separate process. Get off your fat ass and provide some evidence for once. How does it provide evidence for blind watchmaker evolution? How does it provide evidence for Common Descent? Phylogenetic trees are based on similarities. Similarities come from a Common Design. Only an imbecile would think that the differences in the same genes that code for the same proteins, that do the same function is evidence for Common Descent. Common Descent doesn't have anything to account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two alleged related species like humans and chimps. And then there is the problem of getting past bacteria. You still don't have a mechanism capable of doing so. You're suppose to show how this phylogenetic data supports baraminology.  You're the moron who claimed ALL scientific observations support baraminology, remember? Of course you can't.  All your fat ass can do is regurgitate the usual off topic IDiot talking points. What a sad dumbass you are.   :D Common Design. Phylogenetic trees show the degree of the Common Design between any organisms. But how does that support baraminology dumbass? Is all life one big created "kind"? Dumbass. Linnaean Taxonomy is based on a Common Design and represents baraminology. HOW dumbass?   Don't just keep claiming it, show it in the data. Where in the data are the created "kinds"? Chubby dumbass. It is a made up, question-begging tree of life. There isn't any science behind it, dumbass. My claim pertains to science, actual observations and actual experiments. As expected, chubby Joke can't back up his "baraminology" claim.   :D Joke runs his mouth, runs from the genetic data.  Just like always. Wow, timmy is even moar pathetic than I could have imagined. Although I should have known. Show me any science that goes against baraminology. Show me any experiments that refute it. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:09    Phylogenetic trees are based on similarities. Similarities come from a Common Design. Only an imbecile would think that the differences in the same genes that code for the same proteins, that do the same function is evidence for Common Descent. Common Descent doesn't have anything to account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two alleged related species like humans and chimps. And then there is the problem of getting past bacteria. You still don't have a mechanism capable of doing so. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:11    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:08)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:07)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:04)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:03)       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:00)           Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:58)           Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:52)               Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:44)               Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:40)                     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:34)                       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:27) Dumbass- I said that SCIENCE, all OBSERVATIONs and all EXPERIMENTs support baraminology. And as usual you choked on it because you are an ignorant asshole. How does the overall phylogenetic tree created from the genetic record support baraminology Chubs?                         Quote Tree of Life Reveals Clock-Like Speciation and Diversification Abstract:  Genomic data are rapidly resolving the tree of living species calibrated to time, the timetree of life, which will provide a framework for research in diverse fields of science. Previous analyses of taxonomically restricted timetrees have found a decline in the rate of diversification in many groups of organisms, often attributed to ecological interactions among species. Here, we have synthesized a global timetree of life from 2,274 studies representing 50,632 species and examined the pattern and rate of diversification as well as the timing of speciation. We found that species diversity has been mostly expanding overall and in many smaller groups of species, and that the rate of diversification in eukaryotes has been mostly constant. We also identified, and avoided, potential biases that may have influenced previous analyses of diversification including low levels of taxon sampling, small clade size, and the inclusion of stem branches in clade analyses. We found consistency in time-to-speciation among plants and animals, ∼2 My, as measured by intervals of crown and stem species times. Together, this clock-like change at different levels suggests that speciation and diversification are processes dominated by random events and that adaptive change is largely a separate process. Get off your fat ass and provide some evidence for once. How does it provide evidence for blind watchmaker evolution? How does it provide evidence for Common Descent? Phylogenetic trees are based on similarities. Similarities come from a Common Design. Only an imbecile would think that the differences in the same genes that code for the same proteins, that do the same function is evidence for Common Descent. Common Descent doesn't have anything to account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two alleged related species like humans and chimps. And then there is the problem of getting past bacteria. You still don't have a mechanism capable of doing so. You're suppose to show how this phylogenetic data supports baraminology.  You're the moron who claimed ALL scientific observations support baraminology, remember? Of course you can't.  All your fat ass can do is regurgitate the usual off topic IDiot talking points. What a sad dumbass you are.   Common Design. Phylogenetic trees show the degree of the Common Design between any organisms. But how does that support baraminology dumbass? Is all life one big created "kind"? Dumbass. Linnaean Taxonomy is based on a Common Design and represents baraminology. HOW dumbass?   Don't just keep claiming it, show it in the data. Where in the data are the created "kinds"? Chubby dumbass. It is a made up, question-begging tree of life. There isn't any science behind it, dumbass. My claim pertains to science, actual observations and actual experiments. As expected, chubby Joke can't back up his "baraminology" claim.   Joke runs his mouth, runs from the genetic data.  Just like always. Wow, timmy is even moar pathetic than I could have imagined. Although I should have known. Show me any science that goes against baraminology. Show me any experiments that refute it. The genetic phylogeny tree data of extant life I just provided falsifies your stupid Biblical baraminology claims Joke. Everyone else can see it even if you're to stupid and dishonest to admit it.   Dumbass. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:12    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:09) Phylogenetic trees are based on similarities. Similarities come from a Common Design. Only an imbecile would think that the differences in the same genes that code for the same proteins, that do the same function is evidence for Common Descent. Common Descent doesn't have anything to account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two alleged related species like humans and chimps. And then there is the problem of getting past bacteria. You still don't have a mechanism capable of doing so. Joke can provide no evidence for baraminology while I provided genetic evidence disproving the stupid idea. What a dumbass you are Joke.   ETA:  Wait for Joke to break out the BOLD CAPS LOCK like the childish moron he is.   -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:22    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:11) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:08)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:07)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:04)       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:03)         Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:00)           Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:58)             Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:52)               Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:44)                 Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:40)                       Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:34)                       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:27) Dumbass- I said that SCIENCE, all OBSERVATIONs and all EXPERIMENTs support baraminology. And as usual you choked on it because you are an ignorant asshole. How does the overall phylogenetic tree created from the genetic record support baraminology Chubs?                         Quote Tree of Life Reveals Clock-Like Speciation and Diversification Abstract:  Genomic data are rapidly resolving the tree of living species calibrated to time, the timetree of life, which will provide a framework for research in diverse fields of science. Previous analyses of taxonomically restricted timetrees have found a decline in the rate of diversification in many groups of organisms, often attributed to ecological interactions among species. Here, we have synthesized a global timetree of life from 2,274 studies representing 50,632 species and examined the pattern and rate of diversification as well as the timing of speciation. We found that species diversity has been mostly expanding overall and in many smaller groups of species, and that the rate of diversification in eukaryotes has been mostly constant. We also identified, and avoided, potential biases that may have influenced previous analyses of diversification including low levels of taxon sampling, small clade size, and the inclusion of stem branches in clade analyses. We found consistency in time-to-speciation among plants and animals, ∼2 My, as measured by intervals of crown and stem species times. Together, this clock-like change at different levels suggests that speciation and diversification are processes dominated by random events and that adaptive change is largely a separate process. Get off your fat ass and provide some evidence for once. How does it provide evidence for blind watchmaker evolution? How does it provide evidence for Common Descent? Phylogenetic trees are based on similarities. Similarities come from a Common Design. Only an imbecile would think that the differences in the same genes that code for the same proteins, that do the same function is evidence for Common Descent. Common Descent doesn't have anything to account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two alleged related species like humans and chimps. And then there is the problem of getting past bacteria. You still don't have a mechanism capable of doing so. You're suppose to show how this phylogenetic data supports baraminology.  You're the moron who claimed ALL scientific observations support baraminology, remember? Of course you can't.  All your fat ass can do is regurgitate the usual off topic IDiot talking points. What a sad dumbass you are.   :D Common Design. Phylogenetic trees show the degree of the Common Design between any organisms. But how does that support baraminology dumbass? Is all life one big created "kind"? Dumbass. Linnaean Taxonomy is based on a Common Design and represents baraminology. HOW dumbass?   Don't just keep claiming it, show it in the data. Where in the data are the created "kinds"? Chubby dumbass. It is a made up, question-begging tree of life. There isn't any science behind it, dumbass. My claim pertains to science, actual observations and actual experiments. As expected, chubby Joke can't back up his "baraminology" claim.   :D Joke runs his mouth, runs from the genetic data.  Just like always. Wow, timmy is even moar pathetic than I could have imagined. Although I should have known. Show me any science that goes against baraminology. Show me any experiments that refute it. The genetic phylogeny tree data of extant life I just provided falsifies your stupid Biblical baraminology claims Joke. Everyone else can see it even if you're to stupid and dishonest to admit it.   :D Dumbass. How? How does it falsify baraminology? It isn't based on anything besides some scientists personal bias. You don't have a mechanism capable of producing the diversity of life. You can't even get beyond the given populations of prokaryotes. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:23    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:12) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:09) Phylogenetic trees are based on similarities. Similarities come from a Common Design. Only an imbecile would think that the differences in the same genes that code for the same proteins, that do the same function is evidence for Common Descent. Common Descent doesn't have anything to account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two alleged related species like humans and chimps. And then there is the problem of getting past bacteria. You still don't have a mechanism capable of doing so. Joke can provide no evidence for baraminology while I provided genetic evidence disproving the stupid idea. What a dumbass you are Joke.   :D ETA:  Wait for Joke to break out the BOLD CAPS LOCK like the childish moron he is.   :) Lenski's LTEE supports baraminology. All observations support baraminology. And then there is the fat that you don't have a mechanism capable of producing eukaryotes -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:24    Can anyone find any valid references that say tree rings are a code? Anyone? timmy has FAILed, miserably. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:25    Poor dumbass Joke. Too stupid to understand dendrochronology Too stupid to understand genetic data disproves his baraminology claims. Too stupid to do anything but regurgitate the same stock ID-Creation buzz phrases he's been chanting for the last 15 years. Poor dumbass Joke.   -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:28    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:25) Poor dumbass Joke. Too stupid to understand dendrochronology Too stupid to understand genetic data disproves his baraminology claims. Too stupid to do anything but regurgitate the same stock ID-Creation buzz phrases he's been chanting for the last 15 years. Poor dumbass Joke.   :D LoL! Little ignorant timmy. Too stupid to make a case. Too stupid to understand the science. And too stupid to realize that his position is for losers and lackeys. There isn't any genetic data that refutes baraminology. I understand that dendrochronology does NOT say that tree rings are a code. timmy is too stupid to understand that. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:29    Can anyone find any valid references that say tree rings are a code? Anyone? timmy has FAILed, miserably. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:31    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:23)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:12)     Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:09) Phylogenetic trees are based on similarities. Similarities come from a Common Design. Only an imbecile would think that the differences in the same genes that code for the same proteins, that do the same function is evidence for Common Descent. Common Descent doesn't have anything to account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two alleged related species like humans and chimps. And then there is the problem of getting past bacteria. You still don't have a mechanism capable of doing so. Joke can provide no evidence for baraminology while I provided genetic evidence disproving the stupid idea. What a dumbass you are Joke.   :D ETA:  Wait for Joke to break out the BOLD CAPS LOCK like the childish moron he is.   :) All observations support baraminology. Where do the observations in this paper support baraminology Chubs?       Quote Tree of Life Reveals Clock-Like Speciation and Diversification Abstract:  Genomic data are rapidly resolving the tree of living species calibrated to time, the timetree of life, which will provide a framework for research in diverse fields of science. Previous analyses of taxonomically restricted timetrees have found a decline in the rate of diversification in many groups of organisms, often attributed to ecological interactions among species. Here, we have synthesized a global timetree of life from 2,274 studies representing 50,632 species and examined the pattern and rate of diversification as well as the timing of speciation. We found that species diversity has been mostly expanding overall and in many smaller groups of species, and that the rate of diversification in eukaryotes has been mostly constant. We also identified, and avoided, potential biases that may have influenced previous analyses of diversification including low levels of taxon sampling, small clade size, and the inclusion of stem branches in clade analyses. We found consistency in time-to-speciation among plants and animals, ∼2 My, as measured by intervals of crown and stem species times. Together, this clock-like change at different levels suggests that speciation and diversification are processes dominated by random events and that adaptive change is largely a separate process. It's open access.  Show us in the paper's data where the different created "kinds" are.  Don't shit your pants and run from the data again. Dumbass. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Joe G Posts: 12011 Joined: July 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:32    Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:31) Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:23)     Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:12)       Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:09) Phylogenetic trees are based on similarities. Similarities come from a Common Design. Only an imbecile would think that the differences in the same genes that code for the same proteins, that do the same function is evidence for Common Descent. Common Descent doesn't have anything to account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two alleged related species like humans and chimps. And then there is the problem of getting past bacteria. You still don't have a mechanism capable of doing so. Joke can provide no evidence for baraminology while I provided genetic evidence disproving the stupid idea. What a dumbass you are Joke.   :D ETA:  Wait for Joke to break out the BOLD CAPS LOCK like the childish moron he is.   :) All observations support baraminology. Where do the observations in this paper support baraminology Chubs?       Quote Tree of Life Reveals Clock-Like Speciation and Diversification Abstract:  Genomic data are rapidly resolving the tree of living species calibrated to time, the timetree of life, which will provide a framework for research in diverse fields of science. Previous analyses of taxonomically restricted timetrees have found a decline in the rate of diversification in many groups of organisms, often attributed to ecological interactions among species. Here, we have synthesized a global timetree of life from 2,274 studies representing 50,632 species and examined the pattern and rate of diversification as well as the timing of speciation. We found that species diversity has been mostly expanding overall and in many smaller groups of species, and that the rate of diversification in eukaryotes has been mostly constant. We also identified, and avoided, potential biases that may have influenced previous analyses of diversification including low levels of taxon sampling, small clade size, and the inclusion of stem branches in clade analyses. We found consistency in time-to-speciation among plants and animals, ∼2 My, as measured by intervals of crown and stem species times. Together, this clock-like change at different levels suggests that speciation and diversification are processes dominated by random events and that adaptive change is largely a separate process. It's open access.  Show us in the paper's data where the different created "kinds" are.  Don't shit your pants and run from the data again. Dumbass. It is all speculation, dumbass. There isn't any way to test its claims. You don't even have a mechanism for producing eukaryotes. -------------- "Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth "Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code-  Acartia bogart, TARD YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism

Occam's Aftershave Posts: 5287 Joined: Feb. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Mar. 29 2018,10:34    Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:32)   Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:31)   Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:23)         Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,10:12)         Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,10:09) Phylogenetic trees are based on similarities. Similarities come from a Common Design. Only an imbecile would think that the differences in the same genes that code for the same proteins, that do the same function is evidence for Common Descent. Common Descent doesn't have anything to account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two alleged related species like humans and chimps. And then there is the problem of getting past bacteria. You still don't have a mechanism capable of doing so. Joke can provide no evidence for baraminology while I provided genetic evidence disproving the stupid idea. What a dumbass you are Joke.   ETA:  Wait for Joke to break out the BOLD CAPS LOCK like the childish moron he is.   All observations support baraminology. Where do the observations in this paper support baraminology Chubs?           Quote Tree of Life Reveals Clock-Like Speciation and Diversification Abstract:  Genomic data are rapidly resolving the tree of living species calibrated to time, the timetree of life, which will provide a framework for research in diverse fields of science. Previous analyses of taxonomically restricted timetrees have found a decline in the rate of diversification in many groups of organisms, often attributed to ecological interactions among species. Here, we have synthesized a global timetree of life from 2,274 studies representing 50,632 species and examined the pattern and rate of diversification as well as the timing of speciation. We found that species diversity has been mostly expanding overall and in many smaller groups of species, and that the rate of diversification in eukaryotes has been mostly constant. We also identified, and avoided, potential biases that may have influenced previous analyses of diversification including low levels of taxon sampling, small clade size, and the inclusion of stem branches in clade analyses. We found consistency in time-to-speciation among plants and animals, ∼2 My, as measured by intervals of crown and stem species times. Together, this clock-like change at different levels suggests that speciation and diversification are processes dominated by random events and that adaptive change is largely a separate process. It's open access.  Show us in the paper's data where the different created "kinds" are.  Don't shit your pants and run from the data again. Dumbass. It is all speculation, dumbass. There isn't any way to test its claims. You don't even have a mechanism for producing eukaryotes. Above you said the patterns observed were real but were due to common design.   Now you say it's all speculation. Way to shit your pants and run from the data again Joke.      No baraminology support for you! Dumbass. -------------- "CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way" "All the evidence supports Creation baraminology" "If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic." "Jews and Christians are Muslims." - Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.

Pages: (919) < ... 418 419 420 421 422 [423] 424 425 426 427 428 ... >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard