Joe G
Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007
|
| Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:58) | | Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:52) | | Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:44) | | Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:40) | | Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 29 2018,09:34) | | Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,09:27) | | Dumbass- I said that SCIENCE, all OBSERVATIONs and all EXPERIMENTs support baraminology. And as usual you choked on it because you are an ignorant asshole. |
How does the overall phylogenetic tree created from the genetic record support baraminology Chubs?
| Quote | Tree of Life Reveals Clock-Like Speciation and Diversification
Abstract: Genomic data are rapidly resolving the tree of living species calibrated to time, the timetree of life, which will provide a framework for research in diverse fields of science. Previous analyses of taxonomically restricted timetrees have found a decline in the rate of diversification in many groups of organisms, often attributed to ecological interactions among species. Here, we have synthesized a global timetree of life from 2,274 studies representing 50,632 species and examined the pattern and rate of diversification as well as the timing of speciation. We found that species diversity has been mostly expanding overall and in many smaller groups of species, and that the rate of diversification in eukaryotes has been mostly constant. We also identified, and avoided, potential biases that may have influenced previous analyses of diversification including low levels of taxon sampling, small clade size, and the inclusion of stem branches in clade analyses. We found consistency in time-to-speciation among plants and animals, ∼2 My, as measured by intervals of crown and stem species times. Together, this clock-like change at different levels suggests that speciation and diversification are processes dominated by random events and that adaptive change is largely a separate process. |
Get off your fat ass and provide some evidence for once. |
How does it provide evidence for blind watchmaker evolution?
How does it provide evidence for Common Descent?
Phylogenetic trees are based on similarities. Similarities come from a Common Design. Only an imbecile would think that the differences in the same genes that code for the same proteins, that do the same function is evidence for Common Descent. Common Descent doesn't have anything to account for the anatomical and physiological DIFFERENCES observed between two alleged related species like humans and chimps.
And then there is the problem of getting past bacteria. You still don't have a mechanism capable of doing so. |
You're suppose to show how this phylogenetic data supports baraminology. You're the moron who claimed ALL scientific observations support baraminology, remember?
Of course you can't. All your fat ass can do is regurgitate the usual off topic IDiot talking points.
What a sad dumbass you are. :D |
Common Design. Phylogenetic trees show the degree of the Common Design between any organisms. |
But how does that support baraminology dumbass?
Is all life one big created "kind"?
Dumbass. |
Linnaean Taxonomy is based on a Common Design and represents baraminology.
The tree doesn't show any evidence for Common Descent. The tree doesn't show any evidence for blind watchmaker evolution.
--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth
"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton
Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code- Acartia bogart, TARD
YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism
|
