RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < ... 265 266 267 268 269 [270] 271 272 273 274 275 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 18 2006,08:42   

Quote
Case For a Creator Event at Biola University
by GilDodgen on November 18th, 2006 · No Comments

This is somewhat misleading. The "Case for a Creator" is a rigid, leather, felt-lined container, not unlike a violin case (but somewhat smaller), with molded compartments for the safe transport of the Creator and the tools used for the design and manufacture of biological forms.  Nanotweezers, pliers, stuff like that.

If you've a creator, a good quality Case for your Creator is essential.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
k.e



Posts: 1948
Joined: Mar. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 18 2006,08:45   

Quote
Genesis 2:7
And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.




Then god gave him an @sshole which WAD uses to speak from.
Then WOD gave us a heel, DaveTurd.

After a while Dave Scott Springer then apologized for being one........time wounds all heels.

Of course ......much more believable than a rich chemical prebiotic enviroment in which the first simple cells self organized and reproduced more than 3.5 billion years ago for which we have fossils.

--------------
The conservative has but little to fear from the man whose reason is the servant of his passions, but let him beware of him in whom reason has become the greatest and most terrible of the passions.These are the wreckers of outworn empires and civilisations, doubters, disintegrators, deicides.Haldane

   
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 18 2006,09:22   

Quote
Case For a Creator Event at Biola University
by GilDodgen on November 18th, 2006 · No Comments

Quoting myself...
 
Quote
If you've a creator, a good quality Case for your Creator is essential.

A quick caveat.  Although many cases for the creator are available, you may be tempted to build your own.  

Great care is required in the planning and construction of a case for a creator.  Although I haven't time to go into detail here, I can share a few crucially important preliminary thoughts:

- the case must be extremely rigid, and impervious to environmental insults and events.  

- the interior atmosphere of the case must be carefully monitored and controlled - much as a high quality instrument case can monitor humidity.   A Nixplanatory filter at every entrance is a good start.

- it is ESSENTIAL that little can be inferred about the form and function of the creator (and tools) carried within the case from the case itself.  This information can be used to cause harm to the creator itself were it to fall into the wrong hands.    

Cases for creators are easily destroyed when not properly constructed and protected.  Don't let this happen to you!

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 18 2006,10:42   

Quote (Kristine @ Nov. 18 2006,00:04)
I'm sorry to drag this up again but as I was preparing to shut down for the night DaveScot just sent me a "cease and desist" e-mail mentioning lawyers and I am really, really scared!

Tell him to go fuck himself.

The coward.

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
Stephen Elliott



Posts: 1776
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 18 2006,11:48   

Quote (Kristine @ Nov. 18 2006,00:04)
I'm sorry to drag this up again but as I was preparing to shut down for the night DaveScot just sent me a "cease and desist" e-mail mentioning lawyers and I am really, really scared!

The irony is, he considers the statement that I made at my blog about liking to "frighten women" libelous!

That e-mail was not meant to frighten me?

This is crazy. I have to go to sleep so that I can endure class in the morning. I did not sleep last night because of all this. How can I sleep tonight?

I don't know how this is going to end but I just wanted to thank all of you for your support during this. You assured me that he wouldn't try to harm me. What a pity he doesn't live up to your expectations.

John is upstairs asleep and I am literally hyperventilating. Oh he copied John on the e-mail, too. This after telling me that John doesn't exist.

Sorry to say this, but this just doesn't ring true.

If DaveTard threatened me with the law (on libel) I would be laughing too hard to respond (at least for a while).

The guy is pure scum and it is well documented by people on the www all over the world. In a court of law his case would probably last as long as a snowball in a blast furnace.

I eagerly await a summons by the tards lawyers for calling him a liar, scoundrel, scumbag, tosser and waste of space.

  
Kristine



Posts: 3061
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 18 2006,12:13   

Rev. Dr. Lenny and Stephen, read my second post and let it go. Seriously.

I am aware of the comments by DaveScot raised by several people as counterpoint but we are talking about now.

I am not saying that I agree totally with his interpretation of this but it's time to move on. Yes, I was scared. No, I am not anymore. Thank you, everyone, for letting me have my Before Sunset wig out in the SUV moment.

John and I talked this morning (again!;) and he said something quite profound (he is my better half) about how writing has been for thousands of years a rather formal enterprise, being that other signals (gesture, expression, inflection) are not present, but that the internet gives the impression of a conversation when in fact it is simply unedited writing. I took that to heart.

I can't speak for DaveScot but I'm aware of those "ebola boys" statements and all I can say is that I think he's on notice about stuff like that from now on. It's up to him.

I guess I'd like to get back to UD although it seems to have become the Sal-GilDodgen-O'Leary flagship and not as much fun I admit.

--------------
Which came first: the shimmy, or the hip?

AtBC Poet Laureate

"I happen to think that this prerequisite criterion of empirical evidence is itself not empirical." - Clive

"Damn you. This means a trip to the library. Again." -- fnxtr

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 18 2006,14:29   

Lets just make it crystal clear to DaveScot:

Lay a bit on Kristine and the AtBC Shannon Style Legion of Warriors will descend upon you with Animal on the Attack Speed, Buzz Saw Strength, and World Championship Stamina.

Grrrr.  Revarding!  Very very very revarding!

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
Zachriel



Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 18 2006,14:49   

Joseph over at Uncommon Descent
     
Quote
As for Larry Moran, I posted on his blog and will soon see what he has. Guys like that would have flunked Newton, Galileo and Kepler…


So I strolled over to Larry Moran's new blog, Sandwalk, Strolling with a skeptical biochemist where Joseph challenged Larry thusly.
   
Quote
People should reject Darwinism- that is until it can be scientifically (objectively) tested.


Now, what is interesting about this is that Larry's previous thread is titled "Why I'm not a Darwinist". Ouch, Joseph!

(Now I'm not quite sure of Larry's understanding of the centuries-old theories of "Newton, Galileo and Kepler", but he wrote the book on biochemistry, literally.)

--------------

You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

   
Zachriel



Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,07:01   

platolives
Quote
Any professor with intellectual integrity would , I think, grab the bull by both horns yet many clearly do not understand that one need not multiply it into something caused by a deity. The Ockhamistic informationists (vs, the anti-informationists), can live with the notion that life is brought about by an unidentifiable, supersensible intelligence.


That's right. It's not a deity. It's an unidentifiable, supersensible intelligence.

(Notice that the commenter chose the phrase "unidentifiable" rather than "as yet unidentified", even though he has already assigned this agent characteristics, that of being a "supersensible intelligence".)

--------------

You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,12:02   

EDIT: A big warm welcome to the interlopers from uncommon descent! Funny how you’re here, as ID has nothing to do religion, no siree. We have atheists on-hand to help you with the long words… *wink*.

here are DaveScots real views on bigotry...

http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin....p=39353

D*mbski...

http://www.uncommondescent.com/archives/1792


 
Quote
Let me suggest that it is an empirical question whether college students who support ID are smarter, dumber, or comparable to college students who support Larry’s brand of evolution — IQ tests, SAT and ACT tests, longitudinal studies of academic and life success, etc. can all be carried out on the two groups. I would venture that students who are ID supporters come out ahead (in part because they need to display the independence of spirit and intellect needed to face down bullies like Moran):


Already been done, Bill:

http://www.answers.com/topic/religiosity-and-intelligence

http://kspark.kaist.ac.kr/Jesus/Intelligence%20&%20religion.htm

Numerous studies and meta-studies show that theistic belief is negatively correlated with IQ. I am fascinated by the causation aspect. Thick because they're fundies? Fundies 'cause they're thick. Shallow end of the gene pool? Does anyone have a hypothesis?

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,14:26   

Quote (Zachriel @ Nov. 19 2006,07:01)
platolives
 
Quote
Any professor with intellectual integrity would , I think, grab the bull by both horns yet many clearly do not understand that one need not multiply it into something caused by a deity. The Ockhamistic informationists (vs, the anti-informationists), can live with the notion that life is brought about by an unidentifiable, supersensible intelligence.


That's right. It's not a deity. It's an unidentifiable, supersensible intelligence.

(Notice that the commenter chose the phrase "unidentifiable" rather than "as yet unidentified", even though he has already assigned this agent characteristics, that of being a "supersensible intelligence".)

Crap AGAIN!

I was still working with "Disembodied Telic Entity"!

Who the heck is in charge of getting out the MEMOS????

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Bing



Posts: 144
Joined: Mar. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,14:41   

On the Larry Moran thread we find this gem:

Quote
3. Scott  // Nov 19th 2006 at 2:06 pm

Big shocker - he’s also an atheist fundamentalist…

http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2006/11/celebrity-atheists-and-wimps.html

Funny how atheism and blind zealotry for the Darwinian mystery religion so often go hand in hand.

Comment by Scott — November 19, 2006 @ 2:06 pm


But ID is all about the science, nothing about religion, no siree!  ID is not in any way the repackaged creationism taken from bible thumpers past, even if some activist judge says so.  So there's absolutely no reason at all to mention someone's religiousity or lack thereof.  Move along folks, nothing to see here.

  
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,15:32   

Quote
I was still working with "Disembodied Telic Entity"!

This is a big tent, able to embrace all or any part of the Unidentifiable, Disembodied Supersensible Intelligent Telic Entity, or UDSITE.

The primary remaining concern is whether the UDSITE works by means of descent with meddling, power-poofs, or front loading.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,15:35   

*watches the float submerge*

 
Quote
Richard T. Hughes (whose accomplishments other than being an ATBC poster child remain unknown) writes on religiosity and intelligence in response to Dembski:

Already been done, Bill:

http://www.answers.com/topic/religiosity-and-intelligence

http://kspark.kaist.ac.kr/Jesus/Intelligence%20&%20religion.htm

Numerous studies and meta-studies show that theistic belief is negatively correlated with IQ. I am fascinated by the causation aspect. Thick because they’re fundies? Fundies ’cause they’re thick. Shallow end of the gene pool? Does anyone have a hypothesis?

Hey Dick (I trust you don’t mind if I call you that as long as I capitalize it), did you know that shoe size correlates with level of education? The larger your shoe size the more education you’ve likely had. Is that because big feet cause big brains? Or because big brains cause big feet? Duh.

Anyhow, the primary point I wanted to make wasn’t that mixing idiots and loose correlations result in loose idiotic conclusions. That was a tertiary point.

The main point is that people like Dick make aspersions targeted at “fundies” that are identical to those made in the past based on race and gender. So called fundies have become a politically correct minority that can be verbally abused without consequence. If you yearn for the days when you could speak and act like one race or gender was superior to another, if you are so insecure about yourself that you have to castigate others to feel better about yourself, pick on the “fundies”! There will always be some group that small boys like Richard T. Hughes can use and abuse to feel like a big man. In other words, Richard T. Hughes is a racist at heart but since that’s not politically correct he transfers his racism to a politically correct minority.

The second point I wanted to make is how religiosity might be correlated to health, happiness, and prosperity. I don’t know the answer to that. It’s a question I put up for discussion. When everything else is equal, does being religious make one happier or sadder, healthier or sicker, more or less prosperous? I suggest what we do is survey people with identical IQs, identical levels of education, employed in the same professions, but differ by being either atheist or theist. Then we measure the health, happiness, and prosperity attributes to see if there’s any correlation. I predict there’s a positive correlation between religiosity and health, happiness, and prosperity when all other factors are equal.

As a closer, I’d like to ask if anyone knows of a study between religiosity and reproductive success. Does religiosity confer a differential reproduction advantage? Are Darwinists headed towards extinction because natural selection favors religious people? How ironic if so.


My goodness, I've caught a whopper!
Someone give me a hand landing this thing...

And Dave, you should have used 'bigot', not racist. Fundie is not a race, despite those homo erectus rumours.

Dave, I didn't speak to superiority, just a higher IQ. You know, that thing that you think SAT measures. Again, correlation is not causation, as my post says. I’m just dealing with the facts Dave. If they’re bigoted, then so is life. I make no qualitative assessment on the character or value of the person, just that theists tend to be a little slower, on average.

With regard to shoesize, Dave, age is of course the lurking variable. It’s a proxy for age; there is clearly strong multicolinearity between the three. Brain size isn’t really that big a deal, but thanks for the laugh!

If you want to learn more about me, here’s a snippet.

http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin....p=30299

Okay, Dave. Back to what you do best, intimidating girls / cyberflirting with girls who are really boys. Eh. I’ve got to run, the ACLU is stopping some marines praying.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,16:37   

Another one...

http://www.uncommondescent.com/archives/1795#comment-76762


Quote
Given the state of university education and the sorts of idiocy advocated by some advocates, why would anybody think IQ correlates with education ?



Note adovacating advocates are not advocating ID, I think. WHY INDEED WOULD ANYBODY THINK IQ CORRELATES WITH EDUCATION?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ

Quote
Economic and social correlates of IQ Factors Correlation
School grades and IQ 0.5
Total years of education and IQ 0.55
IQ and parental socioeconomic status 0.33
Job performance and IQ 0.54
Negative social outcomes and IQ &#8722;0.2
IQs of identical twins 0.86
IQs of husband and wife 0.4
Heights of parent and child 0.47


--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,17:33   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Nov. 19 2006,15:35)
So called fundies have become a politically correct minority that can be verbally abused without consequence.

(sniffle)  (sob)  boo hoo hoo.

That massively raging martyr complex is one of the things I find most endearing about the fundies.

:)

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,17:46   

Wait.  This from Dave?  Hold on.  Lemme think...

Oh yeah, here it is....

Dave on racism at UDoJ

Quote
I called the authors of the bible "lice ridden beduins" on Uncommon Descent. It really set Josh off. And it's true. I thought everyone knew that Arabs do their camels. It's not racist. It's a simple fact. But hey, if you don't want disparaging remarks about terrorists that want to kill everyone in the U.S. and/or make us all stick our ass up in the air opposite Mecca to worship Allah then I guess that's your call. Is that what you're saying?


Very next comment...

Quote
ou should read this whilst keeping mind that Jordanians are Arabs. I'm not making this up. Arab men are pigs, dear. Misogynous pigs at that. At the least you should know who you're defending and ask if they deserve it. Arab isn't a race, by the way, it's a culture and a part of the world centered on the Middle East, so it's really not possible to be racist against Arabs. That would be like being racist against Canadian morphodykes - non sequitur.

[URL=http://www.etan.org/et2005/march/20/26hushed.htm


Davey?  Are we being a bit umm....




dishonest?  hypocritical?  or just stupid and inconsistant?

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Zachriel



Posts: 2723
Joined: Sep. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,17:57   

Corrected link for DaveScot on UDoJ
http://tinyurl.com/yfozqk

--------------

You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

   
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,18:11   

Thanks, Zachriel.  I forgot that the H word was in that link, which of course gets edited out by the AtBC software.

doh.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,18:15   

Quote (Lou FCD @ Nov. 19 2006,18:11)
Thanks, Zachriel.  I forgot that the H word was in that link, which of course gets edited out by the AtBC software.

doh.

You might want to edit so our guests fgrom UD can enjoy.. :D

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,18:39   

More Davescot goodness:

Quote
Camel f*$kers was just me taking poetic license. It's almost physically impossible fercrisakes. However, Arab men do have a propensity for sexual liasons with boys and animals. It might have something to do with treating women like shit. In my experience treating a woman like shit doesn't exactly increase the chances of scoring. Some men I guess would rather pork a farm animal than be decent to females of their own species.


Slight edit

http://tinyurl.com/y437st


All hail tolerant Tard!

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,19:18   

Ahhh yes.  DaveTard.

Paragon of Parity.

Epitome of Equality.

Father of Fairness.

All around nice guy.

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,19:58   

Quote (Lou FCD @ Nov. 19 2006,17:46)
Wait.  This from Dave?  Hold on.  Lemme think...

Oh yeah, here it is....

Dave on racism at UDoJ

   
Quote
I called the authors of the bible "lice ridden beduins" on Uncommon Descent. It really set Josh off. And it's true. I thought everyone knew that Arabs do their camels. It's not racist. It's a simple fact. But hey, if you don't want disparaging remarks about terrorists that want to kill everyone in the U.S. and/or make us all stick our ass up in the air opposite Mecca to worship Allah then I guess that's your call. Is that what you're saying?


Very next comment...

   
Quote
ou should read this whilst keeping mind that Jordanians are Arabs. I'm not making this up. Arab men are pigs, dear. Misogynous pigs at that. At the least you should know who you're defending and ask if they deserve it. Arab isn't a race, by the way, it's a culture and a part of the world centered on the Middle East, so it's really not possible to be racist against Arabs. That would be like being racist against Canadian morphodykes - non sequitur.

[URL=http://www.etan.org/et2005/march/20/26hushed.htm


Davey?  Are we being a bit umm....




dishonest?  hypocritical?  or just stupid and inconsistant?

Juxtapose that with this:

 
Quote
The main point is that people like Dick make aspersions targeted at “fundies” that are identical to those made in the past based on race and gender. So called fundies have become a politically correct minority that can be verbally abused without consequence. If you yearn for the days when you could speak and act like one race or gender was superior to another, if you are so insecure about yourself that you have to castigate others to feel better about yourself, pick on the “fundies”! There will always be some group that small boys like Richard T. Hughes can use and abuse to feel like a big man. In other words, Richard T. Hughes is a racist at heart but since that’s not politically correct he transfers his racism to a politically correct minority.


So let's sum up, shall we?

In planet Dave Tard, you are a 'racist' for not liking fundies.

BUT: Hating Arabs and saying they all fuck camels... wait for it...

does NOT make you a racist!

Ta-dah!

The scary thing?

Dave really believes this. He really thinks this way.

No wonder he's stupid enough to think ID is real science and that Dembski is a great scientist.

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,20:36   

Jesus, this is BEYOND pathetic:

 
Quote
13. DaveScot // Nov 19th 2006 at 9:32 pm

jwrennie

The system is designed so that higher IQ results in higher education. SAT scores are a good proxy for IQ scores. Higher SAT score means better chance of admittance at many universities and scholarships to help pay for it. Plus the lower the SAT score the more effort is required to get passing grades which also favors the high scorers in acquiring more years of education.


Really, really, my 29-year-old SAT scores PROVE I'm a genius, REALLY! You gotta believe me!

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
"Rev Dr" Lenny Flank



Posts: 2560
Joined: Feb. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,20:55   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Nov. 19 2006,18:39)
**** In my experience**** treating a woman like shit doesn't exactly increase the chances of scoring.


(Emphasis added)

Indeed, I'm guessing that DaveTard has, uh, LOTS of experience with that . . . .

--------------
Editor, Red and Black Publishers
www.RedandBlackPublishers.com

  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,21:51   

Quote
If you yearn for the days when you could speak and act like one race or gender was superior to another, if you are so insecure about yourself that you have to castigate others to feel better about yourself


I called the authors of the bible "lice ridden beduins" on Uncommon Descent. It really set Josh off. And it's true. I thought everyone knew that Arabs do their camels. It's not racist. It's a simple fact. But hey, if you don't want disparaging remarks about terrorists that want to kill everyone in the U.S. and/or make us all stick our ass up in the air opposite Mecca to worship Allah then I guess that's your call.

 
Quote
There will always be some group that small boys like Richard T. Hughes can use and abuse to feel like a big man.


Arab men are pigs, dear. Misogynous pigs at that.

That would be like being racist against Canadian morphodykes


Over 17,000 scientists agree with me.

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,23:03   

Quote
In planet Dave Tard, you are a 'racist' for not liking fundies.


My like or dislike is beside the point. I was just highlighting that emperically they are likely to have lower IQs. ;)

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,23:21   

Quote (Richardthughes @ Nov. 19 2006,23:03)
 
Quote
In planet Dave Tard, you are a 'racist' for not liking fundies.


My like or dislike is beside the point. I was just highlighting that emperically they are likely to have lower IQs. ;)

IQ's aren't important, what about their SAT scores?

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 19 2006,23:26   

Good point. If you were to pull super-genius Davetard, threatener of women© out of the mix, his high SAT scores for the, erm atheist, camp would be removed, probably giving the theists the edge...

:p

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 20 2006,02:06   

http://www.uncommondescent.com/archives/1792#comment-76846

Quote
However, this argument is not for us but for whom aren’t aware of this and more and more use the IQ argument to discredit non-atheistic or non-agnostic people.


Cheese on your word salad?

non-atheistic = non-non-non-atheistic = theistic
non-agnostic = non-non-non-agnostic = gnostic (or does it?)

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < ... 265 266 267 268 269 [270] 271 272 273 274 275 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]