Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > Uncommonly Dense Thread 3

Pages: (501) < ... 341 342 343 344 345 [346] 347 348 349 350 351 ... >

khan Posts: 1554 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 18 2011,18:45    Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Feb. 18 2011,19:35) Uncommonly Denyse:       Quote The funniest example I ever saw was the God Helmet saga at a university here in Ontario a few years ago (where an atheist prof claimed this helmet could make people have religious experiences). I practically split a gut laughing as I was writing it up for The Spatula Brain. She's right - that is ridiculous. It suggests that activity within a specific area of the brain - say the right middle temporal cortex* - may be associated with a subjective sense of being in contact with a spiritual reality, and hence belief in God, and a soul. But that's just too silly. No one in their right mind would claim to have localized spiritual experiences with such specificity, much less promulgate such a claim in the popular press. To do so would suggest that such experiences have a neural and hence a material basis, and could therefore be elicited by external activation of that area.   *The Spatula Brain, page 273. You read it? Peace my friend. :) -------------- "It's as if all those words, in their hurry to escape from the loony, have fallen over each other, forming scrambled heaps of meaninglessness." -damitall That's so fucking stupid it merits a wing in the museum of stupid. -midwifetoad Frequency is just the plural of wavelength... -JoeG

Reciprocating Bill Posts: 4265 Joined: Oct. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 18 2011,18:49    Quote (khan @ Feb. 18 2011,19:45) Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Feb. 18 2011,19:35) Uncommonly Denyse:         Quote The funniest example I ever saw was the God Helmet saga at a university here in Ontario a few years ago (where an atheist prof claimed this helmet could make people have religious experiences). I practically split a gut laughing as I was writing it up for The Spatula Brain. She's right - that is ridiculous. It suggests that activity within a specific area of the brain - say the right middle temporal cortex* - may be associated with a subjective sense of being in contact with a spiritual reality, and hence belief in God, and a soul. But that's just too silly. No one in their right mind would claim to have localized spiritual experiences with such specificity, much less promulgate such a claim in the popular press. To do so would suggest that such experiences have a neural and hence a material basis, and could therefore be elicited by external activation of that area.   *The Spatula Brain, page 273. You read it? Peace my friend. :) Read it?? Check it out. -------------- Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be. "The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you." - David Foster Wallace "Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down." - Barry Arrington

Erasmus, FCD Posts: 6349 Joined: June 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 18 2011,19:23    he'll not be the last scout leader that mangles the concepts of supervenience and explanatory reduction, eh, cap'n? forsooth, ain't it!   and may you yourself mangle the notion of the linear and unidirectional flow of time and retrieve the little bits of you that had to die in order for you to scrutinize what you knew the whole time was gonna be a whole bunch of horseshit.  else there's no justice in the land -------------- You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

Lou FCD Posts: 5455 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 18 2011,19:54    Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Feb. 18 2011,19:35) Uncommonly Denyse:       Quote The funniest example I ever saw was the God Helmet saga at a university here in Ontario a few years ago (where an atheist prof claimed this helmet could make people have religious experiences). I practically split a gut laughing as I was writing it up for The Spatula Brain. She's right - that is ridiculous. It suggests that activity within a specific area of the brain - say the right middle temporal cortex* - may be associated with a subjective sense of being in contact with a spiritual reality, and hence belief in God, and a soul. But that's just too silly. No one in their right mind would claim to have localized spiritual experiences with such specificity, much less promulgate such a claim in the popular press. To do so would suggest that such experiences have a neural and hence a material basis, and could therefore be elicited by external activation of that area.   *The Spatula Brain, page 273. lol, that right there is fucking hysterical. -------------- “Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas? Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

noncarborundum Posts: 320 Joined: Jan. 2009 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 18 2011,20:00    Quote (REC @ Feb. 18 2011,16:51) UD   Quote Our mission at CrossExamined.org is to equip high school and college students to know why Christianity is true, how to defend it, and how to tactfully refute those who try to corrupt them. Link "Corrupt"?  I can see they're serious about tactfulness.  I always like to accuse those who disagree with me of trying to "corrupt" me.  Tactfully, of course. -------------- "The . . . um . . . okay, I was genetically selected for blue eyes.  I know there are brown eyes, because I've observed them, but I can't do it.  Okay?  So . . . um . . . coz that's real genetic selection, not the nonsense Giberson and the others are talking about." - DO'L

REC Posts: 638 Joined: Sep. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 18 2011,21:40    Jeebuz, I was going to peruse UD for something snarky to say. Couldn't even make it past DOL's post title: Quote No, Thomas Aquinas was not a Darwinist, not even close No Thomas Aquinas (d. 1274), was not even close to being a Darwinist (b. 1809). Fuckity fuck fuck-shit these people are bad-dumb.

REC Posts: 638 Joined: Sep. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 18 2011,21:43    By the way, if I was Dr. Dr. D, and the responses to my latest blogpost were nullasalus (which translates to none are saved-outside the Catholic faith that is (do the evangelicals not study Latin???)), DOL, BA77, and Illion the magnificent, I'd scrub the blog and find a new career.

sparc Posts: 2088 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 18 2011,22:09    Quote (REC @ Feb. 18 2011,16:51) Do ID types have no ability to self-reflect? On one hand, Cornelius Hunter, O'Leary and the like scream about the Darwin tax lobby, and hold every quote by PZ Myers and Dawkins (most have nothing to do with evolution) as evidence that evolution is evil atheism incarnate. And Dr. Dr. D is spending his summer indoctrinating little Christians to resist secularism:   Quote ID is clearly a factor here in undermining faith in atheism. UD   Quote Our mission at CrossExamined.org is to equip high school and college students to know why Christianity is true, how to defend it, and how to tactfully refute those who try to corrupt them. Link Crossing students didn't turn out too well for for a teacher recently. -------------- "[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God." - William Dembski -

sparc Posts: 2088 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 18 2011,22:15    Bruce David remains a pain for BA77, upright stupid and StephenB, KF et al. Quote 151 Bruce David 02/18/2011 9:31 pm Goodness, y’ all. I seem to have struck some kind of nerve here. Let me set the record straight. I believe: 1. that Darwinism has been totally discredited by the discoveries in biology over the last 60 years, 2. that ID IS the most reasonable (in fact the only reasonable) explanation for the origin and diversity of life, and 3. that Dembski’s explanatory filter is a very reasonable way of determining when the inference to design is warranted, which makes the inference to design falsifiable TO ALL WHO ACCEPT ITS PREMISES. What I question is whether all people who infer design accept the explanatory filter, and if one doesn’t, the inference to design is in principle NOT falsifiable, precisely because, as I pointed out above, a designer can design something to appear as though it arose through natural causes. I can’t see that this should be particularly controversial, or indeed particularly important in the context of the ID vs. Darwinism debate. -------------- "[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God." - William Dembski -

Badger3k Posts: 861 Joined: Mar. 2008 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 18 2011,22:48    Quote (noncarborundum @ Feb. 18 2011,20:00) Quote (REC @ Feb. 18 2011,16:51) UD     Quote Our mission at CrossExamined.org is to equip high school and college students to know why Christianity is true, how to defend it, and how to tactfully refute those who try to corrupt them. Link "Corrupt"?  I can see they're serious about tactfulness.  I always like to accuse those who disagree with me of trying to "corrupt" me.  Tactfully, of course. Well, if they are going to college, then there are a lot of people who would try to corrupt them - with alcohol, women (or men), dancing, skipping class, sheep... what?  was that just my fraternity?   :O -------------- "Just think if every species had a different genetic code We would have to eat other humans to survive.." : Joe G

Badger3k Posts: 861 Joined: Mar. 2008 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 18 2011,22:52    Quote (sparc @ Feb. 18 2011,22:09) Quote (REC @ Feb. 18 2011,16:51) Do ID types have no ability to self-reflect? On one hand, Cornelius Hunter, O'Leary and the like scream about the Darwin tax lobby, and hold every quote by PZ Myers and Dawkins (most have nothing to do with evolution) as evidence that evolution is evil atheism incarnate. And Dr. Dr. D is spending his summer indoctrinating little Christians to resist secularism:     Quote ID is clearly a factor here in undermining faith in atheism. UD     Quote Our mission at CrossExamined.org is to equip high school and college students to know why Christianity is true, how to defend it, and how to tactfully refute those who try to corrupt them. Link Crossing students didn't turn out too well for for a teacher recently. If they include information on what clothes to wear, are they teaching cross-dressing? -------------- "Just think if every species had a different genetic code We would have to eat other humans to survive.." : Joe G

sparc Posts: 2088 Joined: April 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 19 2011,01:35    Quote (REC @ Feb. 18 2011,21:43) By the way, if I was Dr. Dr. D, and the responses to my latest blogpost were nullasalus (which translates to none are saved-outside the Catholic faith that is (do the evangelicals not study Latin???)), DOL, BA77, and Illion the magnificent, I'd scrub the blog and find a new career. especially if the problem you are talking about has been  soaped during the war of the weasel. -------------- "[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God." - William Dembski -

Louis Posts: 6436 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 19 2011,06:11    Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Feb. 19 2011,00:41) Quote (Louis @ Feb. 17 2011,08:05) Please never associate Denyse O'Leary with the brilliant Kay Redfield Jamison (a personal hero of some magnitude*) ever again. Even by the comedy association of internet diagnosing a shared mental illness. The fact that they, and indeed we, share a species is too depressing for words. It's comparisons like this what cause unrest. Denyse doesn't have bipolar disorder, she's just an idiot. A far less manageable condition. Point well taken, Louis. (But when did you become all earnest and shit? Must be all that reproduction.) Oh I was always earnest and shit. I just cover it with dick jokes to hide the tears. Crikey, that was a bit close to the truth. To the LOLCats, Batman! Plus earnestness interrupts my very trying Mornington Crescent schedule. ;-) Louis ETA: I could make some serious point about comedy being a highly insightful branch of philosophy and cultural expression. One that grants, IMO, a far more profound understanding of individuals and societies than any amount of "serious" work. But hey, it would be wasting an opportunity to post this: -------------- Bye.

Seversky Posts: 442 Joined: June 2010 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 19 2011,08:02    Quote (REC @ Feb. 18 2011,16:51)   Quote Our mission at CrossExamined.org is to equip high school and college students to know why Christianity is true, how to defend it, and how to tactfully refute those who try to corrupt them. Link A headline from the website reads:   Quote 3 out of 4 Christian teens walk away from the church after they leave home. Ummm...and this is bad, how?

Seversky Posts: 442 Joined: June 2010 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 19 2011,08:31    Quote (Reciprocating Bill @ Feb. 18 2011,18:35) Uncommonly Denyse:       Quote The funniest example I ever saw was the God Helmet saga at a university here in Ontario a few years ago (where an atheist prof claimed this helmet could make people have religious experiences). I practically split a gut laughing as I was writing it up for The Spatula Brain. She's right - that is ridiculous. It suggests that activity within a specific area of the brain - say the right middle temporal cortex* - may be associated with a subjective sense of being in contact with a spiritual reality, and hence belief in God, and a soul. But that's just too silly. No one in their right mind would claim to have localized spiritual experiences with such specificity, much less promulgate such a claim in the popular press. To do so would suggest that such experiences have a neural and hence a material basis, and could therefore be elicited by external activation of that area.   *The Spatula Brain, page 273. Many years ago I read a Michael Crichton novel called The Terminal Man.   In part, the story was about an experimental hi-tech treatment for epilepsy.  A patient had electrodes implanted in his brain in the region where his seizures occurred.  The electrodes were connected to a subcutaneous device through which a diagnostic computer continuously monitored the electrical activity in that part of the brain.  When the computer detected the onset of a seizure it instructed the subcutaneous device to deliver small electric shock to the brain in order to forestall the fit. Initially, the treatment seems to work but after a while the researchers are surprised to note that the incipient seizures are occurring with increasing frequency even though the computer is doing its job and preventing the seizures from happening.  It turns out that the patient finds that the sensation of the the electric shocks is pleasurable so his brain begins to deliberately induce the fits. So now I have this image of O'Leary sitting in her basement wearing her "God hat" and an expression of religious ecstasy while exclaiming:  "Oh, yeah, baby!  More!  Hit me again!".

Reciprocating Bill Posts: 4265 Joined: Oct. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 19 2011,09:17    Quote (Seversky @ Feb. 19 2011,09:31) So now I have this image of O'Leary sitting in her basement wearing her "God hat" and an expression of religious ecstasy while exclaiming:  "Oh, yeah, baby!  More!  Hit me again!". Calls to mind the character Hal Abramson (actor Joe Dorsey) experiencing a loop of recorded orgasms in the movie Brainstorm. A (very) flawed movie with some interesting moments. ETA: Should be right up Batshit's alley, given his obsession with NDEs. -------------- Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be. "The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you." - David Foster Wallace "Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down." - Barry Arrington

nmgirl Posts: 92 Joined: Sep. 2009 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 19 2011,11:38    Quote (sparc @ Feb. 18 2011,22:09) Quote (REC @ Feb. 18 2011,16:51) Do ID types have no ability to self-reflect? On one hand, Cornelius Hunter, O'Leary and the like scream about the Darwin tax lobby, and hold every quote by PZ Myers and Dawkins (most have nothing to do with evolution) as evidence that evolution is evil atheism incarnate. And Dr. Dr. D is spending his summer indoctrinating little Christians to resist secularism:     Quote ID is clearly a factor here in undermining faith in atheism. UD     Quote Our mission at CrossExamined.org is to equip high school and college students to know why Christianity is true, how to defend it, and how to tactfully refute those who try to corrupt them. Link Crossing students didn't turn out too well for for a teacher recently. At yesterday's hearing in santa fe, a mother of a college student was there testifying in support of the (teach the controversy) bill.  She couldn't understand why her perfect daughter was being was being told to keep her christianity out of her college biology classes.   So teaching kids how to defend their faith could have a bad effect on their future.

fnxtr Posts: 3504 Joined: June 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 19 2011,12:04    Quote (Badger3k @ Feb. 18 2011,20:48) Quote (noncarborundum @ Feb. 18 2011,20:00) Quote (REC @ Feb. 18 2011,16:51) UD     Quote Our mission at CrossExamined.org is to equip high school and college students to know why Christianity is true, how to defend it, and how to tactfully refute those who try to corrupt them. Link "Corrupt"?  I can see they're serious about tactfulness.  I always like to accuse those who disagree with me of trying to "corrupt" me.  Tactfully, of course. Well, if they are going to college, then there are a lot of people who would try to corrupt them - with alcohol, women (or men), dancing, skipping class, sheep... what?  was that just my fraternity?   :O Must have been just you. We never skipped class. -------------- "[A] book said there were 5 trillion witnesses. Who am I supposed to believe, 5 trillion witnesses or you? That shit's, like, ironclad. " -- stevestory "Wow, you must be retarded. I said that CO2 does not trap heat. If it did then it would not cool down at night."  Joe G

Seversky Posts: 442 Joined: June 2010 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 19 2011,14:56    O'Leary on Coyne, Templeton and woo:   Quote By the way, Coyne’s combox is quite the little hatefest, I see. If you ever wondered whether new atheists like each other, have a brief look. It’s harmful to dwell too long on such things, of course, but speaking for myself, I am glad these people are not Christians. Those attitudes, born again (and it occasionally happens!), quickly sink any “work of mercy” project. And there is a world of need out there. As far as "hatefests" are concerned, I seem to remember that icon of Christian forebearance, Bully Arrington, calling me a "moral monster" and her continual references to the "old Brit toff's" racism are hardly models of Christian charity.  And you can find much worse directed at atheists and agnostics in the threads at UD. Speaking for myself, I am glad she is not representative of all Christians.   As for "works of mercy", does that include rejecting the use of condoms as a means of preventing the spread of AIDS in Africa or Rick Warren's involvement in the criminalization of homosexuality in Uganda with the violence and even murders it is inciting?

Erasmus, FCD Posts: 6349 Joined: June 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 19 2011,17:28    hell "she" doesn't even represent a "she" what do you expect shit i'd be mad at the world too if had to walk around backwards with a shaved face, all the time -------------- You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

Seversky Posts: 442 Joined: June 2010 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2011,03:54    Good ol' SB [URL=http://www.uncommondescent.com/cosmology/philosophy-is-dead-files-and-then-the-corpse-sat-up-right-in-the-middle-of-the-wake-and-de manded-a-swig-and/#comment-372703]commits PKB[/URL] at UD Quote Witness the recent spectacle of highly honored scientists who claim, with triumphant stupidity, that a universe can come into existence without a cause. Witness the continuing spectacle of True Believers™, impervious to evidence or argument, who reject a causeless universe but accept a causeless creator. Witness the continuing spectacle of True Believers™, impervious to evidence or argument, who believe in a necessary, eternal and rational creator but can give no reason why such a being should have created this contingent universe with these observed properties at this time.

Reciprocating Bill Posts: 4265 Joined: Oct. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2011,06:43    Yes. O'Leary approvingly quoted Christopher Norris' defense of philosophy: Quote It continues to offer the sorts of argument that science requires in order to dispel not only the illusions of naïve sense-certainty or intuitive self-evidence… StephenB agreed that science needs more philosophy: Quote Witness the recent spectacle of highly honored scientists who claim, with triumphant stupidity, that a universe can come into existence without a cause. How does Stephen know those honored scientists are wrong? By means of a long-obsolete scholastic philosophy founded upon naively self-evident truths.   -------------- Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be. "The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you." - David Foster Wallace "Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down." - Barry Arrington

Zachriel Posts: 2723 Joined: Sep. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2011,08:18    Second Law of Thermodynamics R.I.P. Quote Granville Sewell: we have to conclude that the second law has in fact been violated here. -------------- You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

Zachriel Posts: 2723 Joined: Sep. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2011,08:27    Quote (Zachriel @ Feb. 20 2011,08:18)   Quote Granville Sewell: we have to conclude that the second law has in fact been violated here. Apparently, the evidence has been there all along. Spaceships, computers and the Internet are 'extremely improbable.' Wasn't it DaveScot who said he was violating the Second Law everytime he typed into his keyboard? Look who has egg on their face now! -------------- You never step on the same tard twice—for it's not the same tard and you're not the same person.

Sol3a1 Posts: 110 Joined: July 2008 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2011,09:12    Speaking of "Uncommonly Dense", John Boehner: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011....86.html

Reciprocating Bill Posts: 4265 Joined: Oct. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2011,09:23    Quote (Zachriel @ Feb. 20 2011,09:27) Quote (Zachriel @ Feb. 20 2011,08:18)     Quote Granville Sewell: we have to conclude that the second law has in fact been violated here. Apparently, the evidence has been there all along. Spaceships, computers and the Internet are 'extremely improbable.' Wasn't it DaveScot who said he was violating the Second Law everytime he typed into his keyboard? Look who has egg on their face now! You can't get egg on your face even in an open system, unless eggs on faces are crossing the boundary into that system. -------------- Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be. "The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you." - David Foster Wallace "Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down." - Barry Arrington

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2011,09:47    Quote (Zachriel @ Feb. 20 2011,16:27) Quote (Zachriel @ Feb. 20 2011,08:18)     Quote Granville Sewell: we have to conclude that the second law has in fact been violated here. Apparently, the evidence has been there all along. Spaceships, computers and the Internet are 'extremely improbable.' Wasn't it DaveScot who said he was violating the Second Law everytime he typed into his keyboard? Look who has egg on their face now! YOU HOMO! .....EGGS VIOLATE THE SLOT. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2011,09:51    Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ Feb. 20 2011,01:28) hell "she" doesn't even represent a "she" what do you expect shit i'd be mad at the world too if had to walk around backwards with a shaved face, all the time NO BIG DEAL FOR DENSE. SMARTER THAN A MUD FENCE BUT DUMBER THAN A TRUCK FULL O' TURNIPS. d.T. -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Erasmus, FCD Posts: 6349 Joined: June 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2011,16:23    it's got a beard on it's split mud fence that would make a turnip up it's disgusting ass feel as inadequate as a redwood would.  HA!  I KILL ME SOMTEIMS I'M GOING TO GO REBUILD MY DOG AND THROW YOUR MOM IN THE LAKE A FEW TIMES OFF OF MY JETBOAT JUST SO BILL CAN SEE WHAT HE IS MISSING THATS WHY I WORKD MY ASS IN MY 30S -------------- You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

k.e.. Posts: 5432 Joined: May 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 20 2011,20:19    GIRLY MAN! BILL HAS GOT DENSE NOW BECAUSE HE LIKES IT'S COLD NOSE WHERE THE SUN DON'T SHINE. I WON'T BE TAKING HIM BACK UNTIL HE LEARNS HOW TO REBUILD A CARBURETOR, SHOOT TREES INTO FIREWODD AND CHAINSAW SHERRIFS. d.T -------------- "I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit "ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus "I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

Pages: (501) < ... 341 342 343 344 345 [346] 347 348 349 350 351 ... >

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard