Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution

Antievolution.org Discussion Board > From the Panda's Thumb > After the Bar Closes... > Early Philosophies

Richardthughes Posts: 11177 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 22 2008,10:22    I am not well learned in this so would welcome insights. The modern usages of "cynic" and "stoic" seem quite removed from the philosophical movements that created them, and a casual examination would make them appear virtuous to my eyes. Perhaps cynicism has become a bad thing against the backdrop of faith, a vehicle for creating the credulous? Also how did "epicurean" become restricted to a gastronomical term. Educated me. I'm eager - but I wont pay! -------------- "Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield "You magnificent bastard! " : Louis "ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard "I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932 "...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

Mr_Christopher Posts: 1238 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 22 2008,10:58    Stoicism was a fantastic philosophy!  Sadly the term "stoic" now seems to mean without emotion. Read Marcus Aurelius, Musonius Rufus and Epictetus. For a modern interpetation read anything by Albert Ellis, PhD. who based his approach to modern psychology on key stoic ideas.  Specifically the notion that "we are disturbed not by events, but by the views which we take of them" which was advocated by Epictetus.  In fact some folks here might find it interesting that Ellis credits Epictetus, Karl Popper and Alfred Korzybski ("Science and Sanity") as his greatest influences. Chris edizt: cuz I can -------------- Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson

C.J.O'Brien Posts: 395 Joined: Aug. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 22 2008,12:06    The Cynics were rebels, man. They liked to shake up The Man with their crazy hair-dos and their wild ideas. Interestingly, some of Jesus's most perplexing teachings (attributed to him by early Jesus movements that were more on the order of a Greek school of philosophy than like the Christ cults of the later 1st Century) bear a striking resemblance to Cynic teachings. Many Cynic aphorisms have the flavor of Zen koans --their aim was to puzzle the listener to make him question societal mores and envision other ways of living than traditional modes. Hippies, basically. The modern connotation of the term came about because the Cynics were interested in puncturing complacency and sending up social taboos --their take on society was jaded and critical, though with intent to reform, which is missing from the modern meaning. Epicurus was an atheist materialist. He rejected concepts of an afterlife or supernatural realms of the gods. His philosophical school therefore focussed on the question of how to live this life, in this world, without looking ahead to 'a better place' but also without fear of death. They valued worldly pleasures (hence the vernacular connotations of the name), but being good Hellenes, they also regarded moderation in all things as the highest virtue. So the caricature of the Epicurians as hedonists is not really accurate. -------------- The is the beauty of being me- anything that any man does I can understand. --Joe G

J-Dog Posts: 4402 Joined: Dec. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 22 2008,12:51    Quote (Mr_Christopher @ Feb. 22 2008,10:58) Stoicism was a fantastic philosophy!  Sadly the term "stoic" now seems to mean without emotion. Read Marcus Aurelius, Musonius Rufus and Epictetus. For a modern interpetation read anything by Albert Ellis, PhD. who based his approach to modern psychology on key stoic ideas.  Specifically the notion that "we are disturbed not by events, but by the views which we take of them" which was advocated by Epictetus.  In fact some folks here might find it interesting that Ellis credits Epictetus, Karl Popper and Alfred Korzybski ("Science and Sanity") as his greatest influences. Chris edizt: cuz I can I personally am rather fond of Epictitties, who had a couple of BIG ideas, that I can really dive into, and I try to get my hands on all the Epictitties material I can, as often as I can. It has been often discussed whether it is the firmness of Epictitties, or the size of the Epictitties that is of primary importance, and while some men hypothesize that "any Epictittie is better than NO Epictittie"*, I find that is best to be firm about the subject. Sometimes it is best to approach the subject delicately, after perhaps long discourse, dinner and a little beer or whine, there are other times when the straight-up approach works best**, and knowing which is the best approach, at the right times my friends... THIS is the Great Philosophical Truth that all men seek. *Louis after 1 bottle of good vintage port, & 1  bottle of merlot.   **Richard after 6 Smithwicks -------------- Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10 Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08 UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

BWE Posts: 1902 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 22 2008,13:31    I always thought the sophists got a short shrift too. wiki -------------- Who said that ev'ry wish would be heard and answered When wished on the morning star Somebody thought of that, and someone believed it Look what it's done so far The Daily Wingnut

Wesley R. Elsberry Posts: 4987 Joined: May 2002 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 22 2008,14:14    Quote (BWE @ Feb. 22 2008,13:31) I always thought the sophists got a short shrift too. wiki That was a great line in "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance", something like, "They had never dealt with a live sophist, only dead ones." -------------- "You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

C.J.O'Brien Posts: 395 Joined: Aug. 2005 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 22 2008,14:32    Yes, the sophists were Plato's straw-man punching bag, so as far as the Western canon is concerned, they never really got to speak up in their own defense. -------------- The is the beauty of being me- anything that any man does I can understand. --Joe G

Mr_Christopher Posts: 1238 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 22 2008,15:31    OT: Am I the only person in north american who thinks plato and his pocket pal Socrates were a couple of complete morons? -------------- Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson

Richardthughes Posts: 11177 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 22 2008,15:48    Quote (Mr_Christopher @ Feb. 22 2008,15:31) OT: Am I the only person in north american who thinks plato and his pocket pal Socrates were a couple of complete morons? Not morons, but... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Open_Society_and_Its_Enemies -------------- "Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield "You magnificent bastard! " : Louis "ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard "I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932 "...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

Mr_Christopher Posts: 1238 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 22 2008,16:09    Quote (Richardthughes @ Feb. 22 2008,15:48) Quote (Mr_Christopher @ Feb. 22 2008,15:31) OT: Am I the only person in north american who thinks plato and his pocket pal Socrates were a couple of complete morons? Not morons, but... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Open_Society_and_Its_Enemies Fascinating that. Thanks for the linky. I always thought if I could have had a conversation with Plato I would have made a rule that the moment he stopped making sense the conversation would end.  With that in mind I figured our chat would last maybe 90 seconds, perhaps less. -------------- Uncommon Descent is a moral cesspool, a festering intellectual ghetto that intoxicates and degrades its inhabitants - Stephen Matheson

BWE Posts: 1902 Joined: Jan. 2006 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 22 2008,16:54    Funny how these things go. Robert Persig wrote most of Zen and the Art as a rebuttal to  Plato and Aristotle. -------------- Who said that ev'ry wish would be heard and answered When wished on the morning star Somebody thought of that, and someone believed it Look what it's done so far The Daily Wingnut

Hermagoras Posts: 1260 Joined: June 2007 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 22 2008,18:52    As a rhetoric scholar, I'm a big fan of the Sophists.  The sophist Protagoras is credited as the father of relativism.  On the down side, the ID creationist crowd operates on Protagoras's principle that there are two (potentially legitimate) sides to every question: hence, "teach the controversy" even when there's not one.   On Epicurianism: Not sure how it got relegated to gastronomy, but the great work in Epicurian philosophy is De Rerum Natura (On the Nature of Things) by Lucretius.  It's a philosophical poem in a kind of mock-epic format (it even uses the classic epic meter -- dactylic hexameter).  Lucretius's Epicurianism is an entirely materialistic philosophy, even evolutionary, where chance swerves of constantly falling atoms make the universe possible. There are some prose translations of De Rerum Natura that are really boring.  But the translation by Anthony Esolen, in verse, is quite good. -------------- "I am not currently proving that objective morality is true. I did that a long time ago and you missed it." -- StephenB http://paralepsis.blogspot.com/....pot.com

fusilier Posts: 252 Joined: Feb. 2003 (Permalink) Posted: Feb. 23 2008,15:01    My philosophy books are somewheres near the middle of that pile over there, so I can't be sure, but IIRC Gorgias was the one sophist who  fought Socrates to a draw. And maybe won on points. fusilier James 2:24 -------------- fusilier James 2:24

Track this topic	Email this topic	Print this topic

© 2002-2009 Antievolution.org Powered by Ikonboard 3.0.2a © 2001 Ikonboard