coldfirephoenix
Posts: 62 Joined: Sep. 2017
|
Hello, I just made an account, because I had to comment.
I was made aware of the existence of this thread while arguing with Gaulin on reddit a while ago, I think some of you were also aware of the "discussion" going on over there, I saw it quoted here a couple of times. (This was one of mine: https://www.reddit.com/r....)
Since then, he has kinda given up on that, after absolutely everybody told him what he was doing was not science. But I was delighted to find out this was still going on in this thread, you guys are hilarious to read, and I enjoyed lurking every now and again.
But now I signed up, because I seriously can't keep up with Gary's Woo-Woo anymore. So, Gary, I would like to ask you a few straightforward questions:
You rail (rather incoherently) against the discovery institute and similar intelligent-design-proponents. Yet, your own wordsalad-"theory" still contains the same claims about "a designer", is still named after intelligent design and still has the same woo-woo about trinity of magically sentient molecules and love (?).
Could you clarify your position for me? Back when I was still correcting you (let's not pretend that it was ever a debate), you very clearly traced your "theory" back to the same roots as the discovery institute and defended their position. Did you realize that that was 100% wrong, and are distancing yourself from that now? And if so, why does your PDF-document still contain all this designer- and trinity-hogwash and basically look exactly the same? Do you still reject evolution by natural selection in favor of your unexplained notion?
I can tell that still nothing you do is even approaching science, but beyond that, it feels that you have gotten even more incoherent.
Can anyone bring me up to speed here?
|