N.Wells
Posts: 1836 Joined: Oct. 2005
|
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 17 2014,22:16) | Now you are talking about what the Intelligence Design Lab is for. That's where you find the all familiar line chart and variables it would have even where a human brain were being simulated. The exact same thing applies to all levels of intelligence predicted by theory to exist. This is not something I have to gather evidence for, the model evidences itself with over two decades of new discoveries explaining how that works at multiple levels in biology. |
No, you haven't ground-truthed any of that. You need operational definitions and demonstration of the actual existence of the things that you claim. Until then, it is all AngelLift and PlaneElevation.
Added to which your program addresses only foraging by individuals, nothing molecular, nothing cellular, nothing evolutionary, no dandelions, no mushrooms, no Cambrian explosion, no genetics, no reproduction, and no Edgar Postrado. So to repeat, What are the units of molecular intelligence and how do you measure it? Which has more "multicellular intelligence", a mushroom or a dandelion with the same number of cells, and precisely how much more?
What is the process by which "molecular intelligence" gives rise to "cellular intelligence"? Since multicellular life appears to have preceded the Cambrian explosion by 1 to 1.5 billion years, does that mean that "multicellular intelligence" is unrelated to multicellular life?
And all the other questions we've asked you since the beginning of the thread, that you have avoided answering. Not least of all is the question of how come we should pay any attention to your ideas when by your own criteria they've been made obsolete by Edgar Postrado's publications?
|