N.Wells
Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 17 2014,20:58) | | Quote (N.Wells @ Dec. 17 2014,20:34) | | That's not an explanation. It's ungrammatical and incoherent word salad with no grounding in operational definitions, standard meanings, and reality. |
Explain to me the "standard" scientific (not religious) meaning of the phrase "intelligent cause". |
After you - it's your pile of rubbish.
Why should I do your work for you?
And to repeat, since you are clearly just trying to evade my questions:
What are the units of molecular intelligence and how do you measure it? Which has more "multicellular intelligence", a mushroom or a dandelion with the same number of cells, and precisely how much more?
What is the process by which "molecular intelligence" gives rise to "cellular intelligence"? Since multicellular life appears to have preceded the Cambrian explosion by 1 to 1.5 billion years, does that mean that "multicellular intelligence" is unrelated to multicellular life?
And all the other questions we've asked you since the beginning of the thread, that you have avoided answering. Not least of all is the question of how come we should pay any attention to your ideas when by your own criteria they've been made obsolete by Edgar Postrado's publications?
|
