GaryGaulin
Posts: 5385 Joined: Oct. 2012
|
Quote (N.Wells @ Sep. 07 2015,19:56) | Quote (GaryGaulin @ Sep. 07 2015,19:41) | Quote (Texas Teach @ Sep. 07 2015,18:59) | Quote (GaryGaulin @ Sep. 07 2015,18:30) | Quote (Texas Teach @ Sep. 07 2015,18:24) | How architecture relates to science replacing "God"? |
Science is a verb. God is a noun (person or thing). Therefore not even the rules of English grammar are on your side in that statement. |
A verb? Gary, I know you aren't on speaking terms with the English language, but this is stupid even for you. Which definition of science do you see listed as a verb? This one? or maybe this one?
Can you conjugate science for us? Is it: I science, you science, she sciences? I'll bet my wife can tell me about how much she scienced last week (I just had to override autocorrect to type that shit, Gary. That should be a clue).
This is why you deserve mockery, Gary. Not because you have foolish ideas. Not even for being stupid. You deserve mockery for arrogantly trying to condescend to your betters while saying things that are not only dumb, but easily checked. Please get an education before embarrassing yourself further. |
"In our class, we use 'science' as a verb." Help Me Create Some Mad Scientists!
|
Lamebrain, even for you. The word "science" derives from a latin verb, but it is not a verb, never has been, and never will be, and that teacher does not mean what he said to be taken literally. He's just using deliberately bad grammar for rhetorical effect, to stress that his science classes are full of doing rather than talking.
In contrast, what you do needs a new word, for which I propose "nescience". This has similar latin roots to the word "science", but from a related yet suitably different word. Look it up. |
Science is supposed to be full of doing rather than talking.
I thus better get back to the latest (work related) science work. It had me studying this amazing device:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v....rHOTjxY
-------------- The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
|