Lethean
Posts: 292
Joined: Jan. 2014
|
Huh, it looks like someone who claims to be making great strides in Intelligent Design doesn't think much of Gary's work.
| Quote | Gary Gaulin and his idea was derived from the old ID. He was posting too in CARM and I told him that his idea was not simple through e-mail and he had seen my initial manuscript in CARM when I introduced my new discoveries before I sent to Nature Precedings..
As I said that since the old ID was not science since it followed Darwin's erroneous idea, Gaulin's idea too was not science since Darwin did not produce science at all.
Thus, don't compare my new discovery to Gaulin...Gaulin's idea and ToE are identical..both not science... |
Link
I find this quite puzzling. What do you think Gary?
--------------
"So I'm a pretty unusual guy and it's not stupidity that has gotten me where I am. It's brilliance."
"My brain is one of the very few independent thinking brains that you've ever met. And that's a thing of wonder to you and since you don't understand it you criticize it."
~Dave Hawkins~
|
