RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (63) < ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... >   
  Topic: Presidential Politics & Antievolution, Tracking the issue< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,06:38   

Assassinator,

I completely agree that there are things politicians won't say--and wouldn't say even if you were torturing them.  That's why I said I didn't think Biden sucked.  He exceeded my expectations of actually saying anything.  While it's sad that you can win a debate by saying only a little, it sure beats saying nothing.

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
Reciprocating Bill



Posts: 4265
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,06:45   

IMHO Palin did MUCH better presenting herself than I would have predicted on the basis of her incoherent television interviews. She does an excellent job maintaining calm eye contact with the camera (this reflects her television training) and, as I said before, has a naturally sunny smile and presentation. That is a big stage - they don't get any bigger - and she did a good job on that score. She has a way of defiantly asserting herself no matter how ridiculous the content of her statements (any of this sounding familiar?), and I can see how lots of people like her.  

I think the difference is that the debate format, in contrast with a television interview with an informed interviewer, permits the candidate to use each question as a launching point for a two minute memorized speech. That is certainly what Palin did throughout - she often simply ignored the question and segued into a topic area in which she had memorized and practiced some spunky responses. Biden too, to a lesser extent, was obviously operating from well memorized scripts. But that's how it is done. And that is a format that allows Palin to present her strengths. There were responses during which she lapsed into near incoherence* - but maintained that spunky glow regardless. I'm not surprised Ftk likes her. In fact, as she said above, it is the spunky glow Ftk recalls, not the content.

Palin has some speech characteristics that, for me, are fingernails on chalkboard. She has a habit lapsing into backward sentence structures, e.g. "I'm not one to attribute every man -- activity of man to the changes in the climate." That's backward, and she does that a lot. I also feel a little ill when she lapses into that "gosh darn it" voice and assumes the vocal tone employed by kindergarten teachers addressing kids just before nap time, and she does that a lot too. But I can see how a constituency that is accustomed to being infantilized enjoys that too.

That said, there is a considerable distance between demonstrating that you aren't entirely clueless and "kicking somebody's ass." Biden more than held his own and demonstrated a LOT of restraint not going after Palin's many inaccuracies. He also avoided being baited by a tone that, at times, bordered upon disrespectful.

And there is a huge distance between demonstrating that you aren't entirely clueless, and perhaps have some charisma (we already knew that), and being qualified to handle the massive complexities and nuances of the presidency - complexities that aren't always amenable to memorized responses. Unfortunately for the country, were McCain/Palin to prevail and then McCain expire, it will be Interview Palin who must grapple with those complexities, not Speechifying Palin. Interview Palin was not very impressive.

*Regarding Biden's assertion that McCain does not support provisions to help homeowners facing bankruptcy: "That is not so. But that's just a quick answer. I want to talk about, again, my record on energy versus -- your ticket's energy -- ticket, also, I think that this is important to come back to, with that energy policy plan, again, that was voted for in '05."

Eta: footnote above.

--------------
Myth: Something that never was true, and always will be.

"The truth will set you free. But not until it is finished with you."
- David Foster Wallace

"Here’s a clue. Snarky banalities are not a substitute for saying something intelligent. Write that down."
- Barry Arrington

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,07:29   

The FTK Palin Debate Flow Chart

It reminds me of the richardthughes ID flowchart!

I'm not surprised.  Palin has the data loaded into her like a talking Barbie, and when her string was pulled, noise came out.  CBS & CNN viewer polls gave the win to Biden.  And so do I.



--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,07:53   

Quote
Somehow, they've (McCain) managed to convince people like FTK that they represent "change" despite the fact that McCain has voted with the current administration 90% of the time and is quite obviously (look at his campaign staff if nothing else) a good 'ol boy from Washington. How can voting the same party back in with more or less the same policies be called "change"?



Here's the deal, folks.  You're not going to see a lot of "change" regardless of who gets elected into office.

That's just a fact...we're screwed because of the situation we're in with the economy and the war.  Obama promises to get our troups out, but I guarantee you he's not going to be pulling them as soon as he promises, because at this point it would be frickin' stupid not to be *sure* that things have stablized over there.  He knows that.  Papa Bush pulled back too soon years ago, and we've paid for it ever since.

The economy is a disaster, and that most certainly does not all fall entirely on Bush and the republicans. You're all well aware of that regardless of how much you like to moan about Bush.  Both sides of the isle have made serious mistakes in regard to the economy.

Whoever gets elected is inheriting a flippin' mess and because of all the corruption on both sides, hands are tied in regard to how much "change" is going to happen.

I like Palin because, of all four candidates, she is a breath of fresh air.  She's spunky, and I don't get the feeling that she's afraid to confront the bull shit that goes on on capital hill.  She's not buried in debt to people who have supported her for eons, and she'll speak her mind without worrying about offending some joker who has her in his pocket.  

She's here to represent people like *me*, and that's a welcome change from the pasty, plastic clones on capital hill.  Of all four candidates, I believe *she's* the one who will go out on a limb for the average joe.

I think she's great....

[Oh, and I don't really think she kicked Biden's ass, but she did *much*, *much* better than I expected.  I was just messin' with you folks because it easy to do so...kinda fun too.  Shame on me.]

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,07:56   

Quote
CBS & CNN viewer polls gave the win to Biden.


OMG!  What a surprise....I'm shocked, shocked, I tell ya.

ROTFLMAO!

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,08:04   

Quote (Ftk @ Oct. 03 2008,13:53)
Quote
Somehow, they've (McCain) managed to convince people like FTK that they represent "change" despite the fact that McCain has voted with the current administration 90% of the time and is quite obviously (look at his campaign staff if nothing else) a good 'ol boy from Washington. How can voting the same party back in with more or less the same policies be called "change"?



Here's the deal, folks.  You're not going to see a lot of "change" regardless of who gets elected into office.

That's just a fact...we're screwed because of the situation we're in with the economy and the war.  Obama promises to get our troups out, but I guarantee you he's not going to be pulling them as soon as he promises, because at this point it would be frickin' stupid not to be *sure* that things have stablized over there.  He knows that.  Papa Bush pulled back too soon years ago, and we've paid for it ever since.

The economy is a disaster, and that most certainly does not all fall entirely on Bush and the republicans. You're all well aware of that regardless of how much you like to moan about Bush.  Both sides of the isle have made serious mistakes in regard to the economy.

Whoever gets elected is inheriting a flippin' mess and because of all the corruption on both sides, hands are tied in regard to how much "change" is going to happen.

[SNIP]

{checks temperature}

{looks at self in mirror}

{feels for lumps}

{finds lumps...oh no! I know what those lumps are, phew}

{books check up with GP}

Wow an FTK post I don't completely disagree with. I must be sick. All the Palin-loving-anti-intellectualism-home-town-folksiness I disagree with, but that stuff before that kicks in isn't all bad.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Spottedwind



Posts: 83
Joined: Aug. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,08:09   

Quote (Ftk @ Oct. 02 2008,23:46)
     
Quote (blipey @ Oct. 02 2008,22:40)
     
Quote (Ftk @ Oct. 02 2008,22:27)
OMG...Sarah soooooo held her own tonight.  If I may be so bold, I THINK SHE KICKED BIDEN'S ASS!!!  

She must have been premenstrual during the Couric interview...she didn't even look like the same person.  Makes you wonder how that interview was conducted.  

I will say though, that Joe (if I may call him that...lol) was quite the gentleman, and he didn't talk down to her.

I'M SO WOUND UP THAT I'LL *NEVER* SLEEP TONIGHT!!!1111!!!!  I'll definitely be needin' my Monster drinks tomorrow...

Of course you did.  Any specific moments you'd like to share with us.

Please, I know evidence is a foreign thing for you, but I gotta know.

PLEASE.  PLEASE.  PLEASE.  Tell us one specific question in which she "kicked his ass".

Oh please.

Oh heavens, I can't be bothered with trying to remember every little thing she said!  I'm a creationist don't ya know...short term memory and all.  All I know is she looked good, winked a lot and smiled pretty.  


BAAAAHAAAAAAHAAAAAA..!!!!  

[/ftk in blipster's twisted mind]


But then you don't go on to contradict him.  To show him that he's wrong in any sort of way.  If someone accuses me of something that I think is patently false about me, I usually like to defend myself.  I know you two have a rather adversarial relationship, but still...if you think it is so untrue, why not have a subtantive post showing otherwise?


(Moving to a different post)

 
Quote
Oh, now blipey, you're just sooooo jealous that we have a hot chick who is not only *hawt*


Ignorning the obvious what-the-hell-does-this-have-to-do-with-compentency question, am I really that alone in not finding her to be hot?  She's not some horrible troll but I really don't see the appeal.  To each their own and whatever, but I just don't see it.  And by the way, just having this conversation makes me feel the dumb.

 
Quote
but obviously knows her stuff and can hold her own with one of the good 'ol boys from Washington.


O.o

...

...


I...I just can't...


     
Quote
I think her personal touch of telling the public that she *isn't* a Washington pure bred is certainly a plus.


Yes, she has said that she isn't one of the Washington insiders, but just because she's said it doesn't mean anything.  She can tell the public whatever she likes; that alone doesn't make it true.  Nearly all politicians say they aren't one of the Beltway insiders or government fatcats...that's what everyone loves to hear.  So, what does it matter if someone says it?

   
Quote
We're sick of the shit going on at the top.


The top you say?  Which top would that be?  For that matter, what 'shit' is going on, at said top, of which you are sick?  (I know that isn't the clearest sentence but I was just having fun with the wording...long and short, what shit are you talking about?)



I know this is cliche at this point, but I just don't get FtK.  I have avoided commenting in her thread because sharper minds than mine are doing the dirty work and I just don't think I can handle it.  I'll admit, I even hesitated responding to the above because I know the futility and that I'm just furthering that persecution complex.  But, really...I just don't get it.

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,08:09   

Quote (Ftk @ Oct. 03 2008,07:56)
Quote
CBS & CNN viewer polls gave the win to Biden.


OMG!  What a surprise....I'm shocked, shocked, I tell ya.

ROTFLMAO!

Why? Don't you trust the viewers? It's not the networks opinion, it's the viewers?

Faced with evidence, FTK can't say why it's wrong IT JUST IS!

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
csadams



Posts: 124
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,08:10   

FtK says, "She's here to represent people like *me*, "

Multiple instances of incoherence? Check.

Demonstrated inability to converse beyond canned/cut-pasted arguments?  Check.

Veneer of folksiness?  Check.

Refusal to respond to specific, substantive questions?  Check.

An admitted outsider who claims to be more knowledgeable in a given area than those who've devoted their life's work to it?  Check.

FtK's right . . . Palin really *does* represent people like her.

--------------
Stand Up For REAL Science!

  
Paul Flocken



Posts: 290
Joined: Dec. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,08:14   

Quote (Erasmus @ FCD,Oct. 03 2008,01:30)
just like some kinda proto-nookular pomo pauli principle, and stuff.

Palin couldn't pronounce it anymore than the current occupant of the White House can.  Is there something in the platform of the Republican Party that says mispronouncing nuclear is a requirement for membership?

--------------
"The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie--deliberate, contrived, and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.  Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."-John F. Kennedy

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,08:25   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Oct. 03 2008,08:09)
Quote (Ftk @ Oct. 03 2008,07:56)
 
Quote
CBS & CNN viewer polls gave the win to Biden.


OMG!  What a surprise....I'm shocked, shocked, I tell ya.

ROTFLMAO!

Why? Don't you trust the viewers? It's not the networks opinion, it's the viewers?

Faced with evidence, FTK can't say why it's wrong IT JUST IS!

Get real...everyone knows CBS & CNN are supported by left wingdingers..big time.

Hell, let's take a look at the Drudge poll...

Quote
{{{{DRUDGE POLL}}}} WHO WON THE VICE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE?...

BIDEN   28% 94,459
PALIN   70% 232,460
NEITHER 2% 5,676

Total Votes: 332,595


Guess it depends on what poll you point to, and who their viewers or readership consists of.

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
dheddle



Posts: 545
Joined: Sep. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,08:33   



--------------
Mysticism is a rational enterprise. Religion is not. The mystic has recognized something about the nature of consciousness prior to thought, and this recognition is susceptible to rational discussion. The mystic has reason for what he believes, and these reasons are empirical. --Sam Harris

   
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,08:36   

Quote (Ftk @ Oct. 03 2008,14:25)
[SNIP]

Guess it depends on what poll you point to, and who their viewers or readership consists of.

Which goes to show that polls of this type, which simply tell us what we already knew about what people believe, have zero informative value.

Don't you see through the "debate" and "folksiness", FTK? Don't you see how you're being manipulated? Is the security blanket of identity politics all you care about?

Oh wait, I know the answers to those. Don't trouble yourself. try the simple questions I asked you on your own thread.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,08:48   

Quote
Don't you see through the "debate" and "folksiness", FTK? Don't you see how you're being manipulated? Is the security blanket of identity politics all you care about?


Dude, I've been "manipulated" by big government for too long now.  We're moving to socialism even as we speak....and Obama wouldn't stop it....doesn't even want to.

I don't want Washington to have so much power.  I want it distributed among the states.  We know what we need, and we don't need the government breathing down our necks telling us what to do and squandering our money.  

I think I'm becoming a confederate...lol.

Sarah supports what I want to see coming from Washington.

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
Ftk



Posts: 2239
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,08:49   

Good one, Heddle.  That big shit eating grin was grinding on me.  Gads...

--------------
"Evolution is a creationism and just as illogical [as] the other pantheistic creation myths"  -forastero

  
Paul Flocken



Posts: 290
Joined: Dec. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,08:52   

Quote (Ftk @ Oct. 03 2008,09:25)
Get real...everyone knows CBS & CNN are supported by left wingdingers..big time.

WOW!, I never knew Glenn Blech was a left wingdinger.  Thankyou for correcting me FtK.

--------------
"The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie--deliberate, contrived, and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.  Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."-John F. Kennedy

  
Spottedwind



Posts: 83
Joined: Aug. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,08:53   

(Of course this came in as I was typing...always happens that way.  Not at you FtK, but as in Murphy's Law.  Anyway...)

   
Quote (Ftk @ Oct. 03 2008,08:53)

I like Palin because, of all four candidates


There are only two candidates for president, well major party candidates that is.  Obama and McCain.  They will be the ones that are making the majority of decisions.  The VP is important and the choice should not be overlooked, but putting too much stock in Palin (or Biden) and not enough in the actual Presidental aspirant is focused on the wrong thing.


   
Quote
...she is a breath of fresh air.  She's spunky, and I don't get the feeling that she's afraid to confront the bull shit that goes on on capital hill.  She's not buried in debt to people who have supported her for eons, and she'll speak her mind without worrying about offending some joker who has her in his pocket.


There's not much I can say to this as it seems to be your gut feeling.  And I have no problem with what someone feels about a person...except if it were to contradict facts.  I'm still not clear on what specifically about capital hill bothers you and thus how she'll be different.  From her actions and history, she seems pretty like every other politician, just slightly different flavoring.

To be fair, I don't think Obama is some excessively different politician...I do see some areas that have been different and I like those...but he's not so different in the grand scheme of things.  To me, he's the best option right now, but I don't see him as the model all politicans should be.  He's got some ideas and tatics that, if emulated, might raise the quality of politics some, but he still falls into some of the same old habits.

   
Quote
She's here to represent people like *me*, and that's a welcome change from the pasty, plastic clones on capital hill.  Of all four candidates, I believe *she's* the one who will go out on a limb for the average joe


Which average joe?  I'm sure to some groups, I'm pretty average and she could not be much more my opposite if she tried.  I know everyone loves to think that they are the average and that everyone else is like them...but somehow that just doens't work out.

And why do you think she'll go out on a limb for the 'average joe' more than the others?  Are you one of those people that thinks simply because the others have money they don't remember or comprehend difficulties the middle class has?  I never liked the attacks on McCain because of the multi-house comment; simply because you have wealth does not mean you don't care or comprehend.  It's like when people attack celebrities for voicing an opinion.  Just because they are an actor, it doesn't mean that they are ill-informed.  Yes, some are and yes, some rich people don't really seem to care or understand the struggle of the poor or middle class.  But you can't predict those things one income alone.  Actions, past history, and comments will tell you what you need to know.

My apologies if I put words in your mouth and that's not the reason...it just seems to be a common one and a pet peeve I have.  Still, why is it that you see her as willing to do what the others won't?

   
Quote
[Oh, and I don't really think she kicked Biden's ass, but she did *much*, *much* better than I expected.  I was just messin' with you folks because it easy to do so...kinda fun too.  Shame on me.]


Fair enough and well played.  Although, *much*,*much* better than the expected failure isn't necessarily success.  By the way, I'm not saying that you expected her to fail, but most people and commentators did and you are at least implying that you expected so little from her that you were happy with what you got.  Nonetheless, you did a good caricature...of yourself?

It does seem odd though that more than a few of us thought you were serious.  We all based that on evidence of the past...but I guess that's what we get from relying on evidence too much.

  
oldmanintheskydidntdoit



Posts: 4999
Joined: July 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,09:40   

Quote (Ftk @ Oct. 03 2008,08:48)
 
Dude, I've been "manipulated" by big government for too long now.  

Can you give me an example? Whatever do you mean by that? Does "big government" come into your home and switch TV channels?
   
Quote
We're moving to socialism even as we speak...

Can you give me an example of that?
   
Quote
and Obama wouldn't stop it....doesn't even want to.

Why do you say that?
   
Quote

I don't want Washington to have so much power.

The people you support handed over power (oversight) to the people they were supposed to be regulating. We can see how that worked out.
   
Quote
 I want it distributed among the states.

You've noted before that you would allow "the states" to make individual decisions about abortion, but would be quite happy if they all banned it because "the states decided" and that would be just fine.
   
Quote
We know what we need, and we don't need the government breathing down our necks telling us what to do and squandering our money.  

Why don't you give me an example of
a) Something that more money should be spent on
b) What should be cut-back to pay for that?
   
Quote
I think I'm becoming a confederate...lol.

...    
Quote
Sarah supports what I want to see coming from Washington.

Which is what exactly?

--------------
I also mentioned that He'd have to give me a thorough explanation as to *why* I must "eat human babies".
FTK

if there are even critical flaws in Gauger’s work, the evo mat narrative cannot stand
Gordon Mullings

  
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,09:44   

Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Oct. 03 2008,09:40)
...      
Quote
Sarah supports what I want to see coming from Washington.

Which is what exactly?

That would be "hawt" air.

And Palin (aka Bush Lite) is full of it.

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,09:46   

Quote (Ftk @ Oct. 03 2008,14:48)
Quote
Don't you see through the "debate" and "folksiness", FTK? Don't you see how you're being manipulated? Is the security blanket of identity politics all you care about?


Dude, I've been "manipulated" by big government for too long now.  We're moving to socialism even as we speak....and Obama wouldn't stop it....doesn't even want to.

I don't want Washington to have so much power.  I want it distributed among the states.  We know what we need, and we don't need the government breathing down our necks telling us what to do and squandering our money.  

I think I'm becoming a confederate...lol.

Sarah supports what I want to see coming from Washington.

So you don't mind being manipulated as long as it's someone you think is like you doing the manipulating.

Interesting.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,09:52   

Quote (Ftk @ Oct. 03 2008,06:25)
Quote (oldmanintheskydidntdoit @ Oct. 03 2008,08:09)
 
Quote (Ftk @ Oct. 03 2008,07:56)
 
Quote
CBS & CNN viewer polls gave the win to Biden.


OMG!  What a surprise....I'm shocked, shocked, I tell ya.

ROTFLMAO!

Why? Don't you trust the viewers? It's not the networks opinion, it's the viewers?

Faced with evidence, FTK can't say why it's wrong IT JUST IS!

Get real...everyone knows CBS & CNN are supported by left wingdingers..big time.

Hell, let's take a look at the Drudge poll...

 
Quote
{{{{DRUDGE POLL}}}} WHO WON THE VICE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE?...

BIDEN   28% 94,459
PALIN   70% 232,460
NEITHER 2% 5,676

Total Votes: 332,595


Guess it depends on what poll you point to, and who their viewers or readership consists of.

"4.5 billion, 6 thousand, it's all arbitrary*. No one's really 'right' (at least when my argument is losing)".







*I know, I know, FTK very likely doesn't know what this word means. You get the idea.

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,09:54   

Quote (Ftk @ Oct. 03 2008,06:48)
Quote
Don't you see through the "debate" and "folksiness", FTK? Don't you see how you're being manipulated? Is the security blanket of identity politics all you care about?


Dude, I've been "manipulated" by big government for too long now.  We're moving to socialism even as we speak....

Next thing ya know, the gummint will be closing all the churches and handing out mandatory marijuana injections! It all started when they fluoridated our water!!

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,09:55   

Quote (Paul Flocken @ Oct. 03 2008,06:52)
Quote (Ftk @ Oct. 03 2008,09:25)
Get real...everyone knows CBS & CNN are supported by left wingdingers..big time.

WOW!, I never knew Glenn Blech was a left wingdinger.  Thankyou for correcting me FtK.

To FTK and millions like her, 'left wingdinger' simply means "they're currently saying something that displeases me".

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,10:04   

What terrifies me is that even otherwise intelligent people are falling into this idiotic game of identity politics. It terrifies me when it's done abroad, and it terrifies me even more when it's done here in the UK.

The shallowness of thought around the political issues of the day reminds me of the shallowness of thought around religious issues. Why people let themselves be fooled is beyond me. Admitting to compromise isn't the same thing as willing blinkered gullibility (and that's where 'Ras and I really differ ;-) ).

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,10:19   

Quote (Louis @ Oct. 03 2008,10:04)
What terrifies me is that even otherwise intelligent people are falling into this idiotic game of identity politics. It terrifies me when it's done abroad, and it terrifies me even more when it's done here in the UK.

The identity politics game is just one more example of the success of the anti-intellectuals in the US. Frankly, very few "intelligent people" have fallen for the faux folksiness of Gov. Bush Lite, but it resonates quite well in the "I'd rather not think about it" crowd. It's the same process that allows non-thinkers to become instant experts on evolutionary theory, philosophy of science, and other rather complex subjects.

I think I will be re-reading "What's the Matter with Kansas?" sometime soon. The ability of the Republicans to package their anti-populist policies in fake populist packages like Bush and Palin is remarkable. People like FtK, who told us how the downturn in the housing economy has affected her family directly, still cannot begin to understand that these fakers do not have their best interests at heart. That's some powerful Kool-aid, and the Republicans have patented the recipe.

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
dheddle



Posts: 545
Joined: Sep. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,10:45   

I disagree with the general charge of anti-intellectualism.

Like many here, I work among the smartest people on the planet—in my case in a national lab. I don’t want any of them governing me. Or, like WFB quipped, I’d take my chances with the first 200 names of the Boston phonebook over the Harvard faculty.

But this is not necessarily anti-intellectualism. It can be recognition that neither high IQ (especially) or an encyclopedic command of facts has a significant positive  correlation  with the ability to lead or govern. That is based on evidence: to first order everyone I work with has high IQ—but they all have different political opinions. Everyone on the SCOTUS has a high IQ and is legal expert, and yet we have many 5-4 decisions. Politics always, or almost always, comes down to the dreaded world-view. Intellectuals may be able to toss a prettier word salad, but that’s about it.

For further evidence go over to the brainiac of blogs and the bastion of rationality (Pharyngula) and start a debate about libertarianism, animal testing, or gun rights. Now imagine those smart, highly educated people are our congress, and what do you get? Name calling, nasty insults, apoplectic rants, and, most telling, no consensus. In other words, nothing different from any other group discussing politics.

--------------
Mysticism is a rational enterprise. Religion is not. The mystic has recognized something about the nature of consciousness prior to thought, and this recognition is susceptible to rational discussion. The mystic has reason for what he believes, and these reasons are empirical. --Sam Harris

   
Arden Chatfield



Posts: 6657
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,10:51   

Somewhat off topic, this is incredibly creepy.

--------------
"Rich is just mad because he thought all titties had fur on them until last week when a shorn transvestite ruined his childhood dreams by jumping out of a spider man cake and man boobing him in the face lips." - Erasmus

  
Spottedwind



Posts: 83
Joined: Aug. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,10:54   

Does anyone have access to The Scientist blog?  I'd like to hear about this entry but can't register at work.

From what I can glean, it's a post about who is advising McCain on Science, something I'd like to know.


(I've found Obama's list and I like what I see.)

One of my biggest frustrations with Bush has been interaction with science.  I get so angry and frustrated about how much interference this administration has shown in scientific* areas.  The agendas that they have pushed that went directly in the face of contrary evidence and either had to have that evidence changed, omitted, or just out right ignored.  Hell, that last sentence pretty much describes the decision making process they used at all times.

To be honest, I didn't think McCain would follow the path Bush has played...but he really doesn't seem like the same guy that ran in 2000.  I respected McCain there and felt that Rove really slimed McCain.  I could have even voted for McCain in 2000 I think.  But the McCain of 2008...I really don't trust him and to be honest, I'd kind of disappointed in that.  His secrecy, his actions...it makes me feel like he'd keep up the same level of interference and political manipulation that we've seen for the last 8 years.  I have no dobut about Palin doing just that.

* Other areas too but specific to science for this topic.

  
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,11:16   

Quote (dheddle @ Oct. 03 2008,16:45)
I disagree with the general charge of anti-intellectualism.

Like many here, I work among the smartest people on the planet—in my case in a national lab. I don’t want any of them governing me. Or, like WFB quipped, I’d take my chances with the first 200 names of the Boston phonebook over the Harvard faculty.

But this is not necessarily anti-intellectualism. It can be recognition that neither high IQ (especially) or an encyclopedic command of facts has a significant positive  correlation  with the ability to lead or govern. That is based on evidence: to first order everyone I work with has high IQ—but they all have different political opinions. Everyone on the SCOTUS has a high IQ and is legal expert, and yet we have many 5-4 decisions. Politics always, or almost always, comes down to the dreaded world-view. Intellectuals may be able to toss a prettier word salad, but that’s about it.

For further evidence go over to the brainiac of blogs and the bastion of rationality (Pharyngula) and start a debate about libertarianism, animal testing, or gun rights. Now imagine those smart, highly educated people are our congress, and what do you get? Name calling, nasty insults, apoplectic rants, and, most telling, no consensus. In other words, nothing different from any other group discussing politics.

Surprise! You disagree.

Dumb =/= anti-intellectual.

Smart =/= intellectual.

The rest of your caricatures are just excuses for your own lack of engagement and desire for convenient faux relativism.

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Albatrossity2



Posts: 2780
Joined: Mar. 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 03 2008,11:30   

Quote (dheddle @ Oct. 03 2008,10:45)
I disagree with the general charge of anti-intellectualism.

Disagree all you want; your opinion is worth exactly as much as mine.

Note that I did not say that ALL those folks who will be voting for McSame and Bush Lite were unthinking. Both you know and I know some smart folks who have looked at the issues and who will be voting for them because that slate reflects their stand on the issues a bit better. But that does not mitigate the fact that the Republicans have been a party of anti-intellectualism and anti-science for a couple of decades now. Beginning with Reagan and continuing now with Bush Lite, they have made no bones about their electoral appeals to the unthinking.

Note that I also did not say anything about having the folks running your national lab governing us. Please put that strawman down. My comment specifically dealt with the appeals of the Republicans to cultural identity politics rather than to substantive issues.

Finally, if you really think that the first 200 names of the Boston phonebook would yield a better president than the people on the Harvard faculty, you have set a very low bar for success at the presidential level. The performance of the current occupant unfortunately barely rises to that level. The performance of a sound-bite slinging airheaded cheerleader, who probably would disagree with most of McCain's positions on many issues if they were presented to her stripped of his name, would almost certainly be lower than that. If that's what you want, we'll continue to disagree, I'm certain.

--------------
Flesh of the sky, child of the sky, the mind
Has been obligated from the beginning
To create an ordered universe
As the only possible proof of its own inheritance.
                        - Pattiann Rogers

   
  1878 replies since Aug. 25 2008,04:17 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (63) < ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]