RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (16) < ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... >   
  Topic: Unintelligent Reasoning< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 14 2009,22:55   

joe is vying for New DaveTard

hilarious read.  y'all kept that fool right ON the edge of absolutely flipping the eff out.  playing it like a diddle twiddle too.  Joe is one of the great Tards.  threads like this one should be in some kind of shrine.  joe is a threat to those around him in general but mostly hisself in particular.

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 15 2009,08:58   

He's still going. He sure can calculate CSI, he just wont do it.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Lou FCD



Posts: 5455
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 15 2009,19:42   

Quote (Richardthughes @ June 15 2009,09:58)
He's still going. He sure can calculate CSI, he just wont do it.

That was some funny stuff right there.

Ask him a few more times for the baseball CSI number, and I would REALLY like to know what specifically was wrong with blipey's experiment.

<chuckle>

--------------
“Why do creationists have such a hard time with commas?

Linky“. ~ Steve Story, Legend

   
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 17 2009,11:19   

Joe's now gone back to not publishing my comments because they upset him (or at least his ability to answer questions).  If he can't deal with people on a blog where he can pretend to be a bigshot, how the hell is he going to react when actually confronted with people reality?

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
Louis



Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 17 2009,11:43   

Quote (blipey @ June 17 2009,17:19)
Joe's now gone back to not publishing my comments because they upset him (or at least his ability to answer questions).  If he can't deal with people on a blog where he can pretend to be a bigshot, how the hell is he going to react when actually confronted with people reality?

Joe can has feer ov klownz?

Like a fiend he can!

Louis

--------------
Bye.

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 17 2009,11:46   

oooooooooooooh no he dint

Quote
Rich Hughes said...
Joe, put up or shut up. Let's have a number. don't make others do your work. Be accountable. You don't walk the talk, you mumble the stumble.

But I'm fine with you hurting ID like you do.

11:56 PM


bwaaaaaaahahahaha

blipey kicks joe in the koran

Quote

blipey said...
On the value of numbers:

Cake baking instructions (you should be familiar, Joe).

1. Turn the oven to hot.

2. Turn the oven to 400 F.

Which is more useful?

The CSI of a baseball.

1. Lots.

2. 3,751.

The interesting thing here is that either answer is probably as good as the other. But not that Joe would know why.

8:06 AM


joe is in full rage mode though and he aint tryin to be hearin all that

rich has a way with joe

Quote
Rich Hughes said...
So to make anything at all designed, all I have to do (ignoring the substrate of language which has its own, unique information ramifications) is to describe it at sufficient length. Fascinating! everything MUST be designed. Should I now buy your book?

1:37 PM


joe is the kinda guy i must have been thinking of earlier but i didn't have him in mind.  the sorta dummy that says biology is stamp collecting etc.  

this is for the ages

Quote
Joe G said...
You can't think of a reason that a baking temperature would be handy?-

No I don't see how it relates to anything in this thread.

And it is very telling that neither you nor Rich can provide a valid reason why a specific number is required for a baseball.

And that you had to switch to an oven temp setting proves that you are a deceptive faggot.

7:22 AM


blipey is toying with his emotions!  lololololololololol

"i am saving this thread it's hilarious har har ur dumb" gets this response from joe
Quote
I am saving this thread also.

It is further proof that you are a bleeding asshole.


it's like NO I'M SAVING THIS THREAD.  MINE.

joe is still wanting something hard from this position

Quote

Joe G said...
BTW I am still waiting for anything rigorous from your position.

10:34 AM


dsksdhkl;sagsdh;as roflmao

Quote
Rich Hughes said...
Sure. What (numerically) is the CSI of a baseball?

10:58 PM

Joe G said...
What (numerically) is the CSI of a baseball?-

What does that mean Richie?

That question doesn't even make any sense from an ID perspective.

No one in ID asks "what is the CSI of x?"

The question asked is "does X contain CSI?"

That is all one requires in order to verify the design inference.

Asking for anything beyond that is just proof of anal-retentiveness, stupidity and ignorance.

7:26 AM


hahahahahahahaha  

joe breaks the toy

Quote
Joe G said...
for blipey:

Do you know the difference between a patrilineage and a paternal family tree? If you answer "yes" please provide examples of both so that we can verify your answer.

Don't bother posting here until you answer that.

And after that there are more questions you have to answer.-

And one more thing for you to ignore:

Ya see CSI is 500 bits of specified information. And once CSI has been determined the design inference is solidified.-

THAT is what CSI means.

Not that I expect you to understand any of that.

10:40 AM


oh man oh man.  i am saving this thread too joe.  that is some damn good internetz right'ar.

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
carlsonjok



Posts: 3326
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 17 2009,12:27   

Quote (Erasmus, FCD @ June 17 2009,11:46)
joe is in full rage mode though and he aint tryin to be hearin all that

Whenever I see Joe getting all macho in the intertubes, I always have this picture of him as Kip from Napoleon Dynamite.

See what I mean?

--------------
It's natural to be curious about our world, but the scientific method is just one theory about how to best understand it.  We live in a democracy, which means we should treat every theory equally. - Steven Colbert, I Am America (and So Can You!)

  
olegt



Posts: 1405
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 17 2009,12:49   

Quote (Richardthughes @ June 15 2009,08:58)
He's still going. He sure can calculate CSI, he just wont do it.

That's a piece of cake, as we know.

--------------
If you are not:
Galapagos Finch
please Logout »

  
GCUGreyArea



Posts: 180
Joined: Sep. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: June 17 2009,15:40   

Quote (olegt @ June 17 2009,12:49)
Quote (Richardthughes @ June 15 2009,08:58)
He's still going. He sure can calculate CSI, he just wont do it.

That's a piece of cake, as we know.

Ha, great reading for an evenings entertainment.

I decided to chip in, but I await mighty Joes moderation...
Quote
Hilarious, Joe I haven't laughed so much in ages.

If I gave you a recipe describing how to turn hydrogen and oxygen into water would the water then contain all the information required to tell you how to turn hydrogen and oxygen into water? Would it contain more information than if I just gave you some water I found?

Do cakes contain their own recipes, even if the recipe involves making water from H and O instead of obtaining it ready made?

If a cake is made by a process that destroys evidence relating to the steps that are required to create it then how can it contain its own recipe?

Dumbass.

Oh, I nearly forgot - why 500 bits and not 499?

   
Occam's Toothbrush



Posts: 555
Joined: April 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 17 2009,16:24   

Quote (blipey @ June 17 2009,12:19)
Joe's now gone back to not publishing my comments because they upset him (or at least his ability to answer questions).  If he can't deal with people on a blog where he can pretend to be a bigshot, how the hell is he going to react when actually confronted with people reality?

Why worry about something so unlikely?

--------------
"Molecular stuff seems to me not to be biology as much as it is a more atomic element of life" --Creo nut Robert Byers
------
"You need your arrogant ass kicked, and I would LOVE to be the guy who does it. Where do you live?" --Anger Management Problem Concern Troll "Kris"

  
Occam's Toothbrush



Posts: 555
Joined: April 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 17 2009,16:25   

Quote (Richardthughes @ June 15 2009,09:58)
He's still going. He sure can calculate CSI, he just wont do it.

But since you can't prove he can't do it, ID wins by default.

--------------
"Molecular stuff seems to me not to be biology as much as it is a more atomic element of life" --Creo nut Robert Byers
------
"You need your arrogant ass kicked, and I would LOVE to be the guy who does it. Where do you live?" --Anger Management Problem Concern Troll "Kris"

  
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 17 2009,18:04   

Quote (Occam's Toothbrush @ June 17 2009,16:25)
Quote (Richardthughes @ June 15 2009,09:58)
He's still going. He sure can calculate CSI, he just wont do it.

But since you can't prove he can't do it, ID wins by default.

Brilliant!  ID in a nutshell.

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 17 2009,21:57   

hahahah that is getting better and better.  joe is almost purple by now

Quote
Joe G said...
Joe, f you can't even deal with me on a blog where you don't even have to see me, how the fuck are you going to react when we're face to face.-

I am dealing with you, you stupid fuck and I have a very good idea what will happen if we are ever face to face.

3:34 PM


blipey is poking him right in the spot man now i swannee.  rich is poking him on the other side

Quote
Joe G said...
Some quick questions to help us both have a common frame of reference:

What is CSI?-


Geez Rich if you don't know then what the fuck are you arguing for?

But anyway CSI stands for Complex Specified Information.

500 bits of specified information = CSI.

Again that 500 bit threshold is the UPB- already mentioned above- by YOU.

Read "No Free Lunch".

Is it an empirical measure?-

Yes it is based on observation and experience. And yes it can be measured by counting the bits.

Just as I have been telling you for what months, years?

How much do you think is required for a "design inference"?-

Again once that 500 bit threshold is reached design is just about as proven as one can get.

However that 500 bit threshold is for the UPB.

But as I said above CSI is more of a verification.

You don't even have to know anything about CSI to make a design inference.

Then someone else could come along see if that initial design inference is solidified by checking the information- ie what it took to make the object/ event in question.

The basic way to determine design is to look for signs of counterflow.

And again I have been over all of this many times so I don't know if one more time is going to do any good.

You guys think that your ignorance is some kind of refutation and that is very entertaining indeed.

3:46 PM


joe thinks rich takes him seriously.  roflmao

Quote
I am not a teacher. This is not a public school. And blipey is just another piece of shit coward who says shit and then never backs it up.

IOW clownie is the controversy. And it is impossible to teach it anything.

As with you the only reason he is against ID is because of some alleged majority of scientists many who most likely don't even understand the debate.

3:49 PM


priceless

Quote
Rich Hughes said...
So how come you can't calculate it then, for a baseball?

3:55 PM


hahahahahahahahah  

how does he respond?

Quote

Joe G said...
So how come you can't calculate it then, for a baseball?-

Calculate what?

Do you understand English?

Measurement- Do you understand the word "measurement"?

If you really want to know whether or not a baseball has CSI just follow the directions.

If you are too stupid to follow the directions then there isn't anything else I can do for you.

4:38 PM



man what a great tard

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 17 2009,22:06   

in the 'marriage is a right' post joe is not letting blipeys comments through but is responding to them any how in the comments, mostly insults and taunts "I know you're reading this".  what a frikkin great tard.  here is a jewel

Quote

Joe G said...
There's a reason we don't give children voting rights and full autonomy, even if some are smarter than me-

Perhaps, but that does not mean it is a valid reason and also we aren't talking about voting, are we?

As for clownie I am finished trying to have a discussion with it.

So if it has something to say to me it can do so face to face.

We can then run a simple test of natural selection.

7:39 AM


Quote
Rich Hughes said...
I wouldn't advise it Joe. I'd hate for you to get at ass kicking.

12:28 AM


bless you two crazy bastids.  that is art what you have done to joe.

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 18 2009,00:18   

Some have socks... I have a puppet on a string.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 18 2009,00:23   

yeah with your charisma rich you might unite the tards!  do not go to the dark side.  you speak their language yet you are not of them.  they will hail thee as prophet and hie upon thee great esteem and reward and thou shalt bring a spirit of divisiveness into their midst and turn them against one another, verily, they shall never agree on the biblical method of baptistry nor FCSI either.

-ps while you are programming joe see if you can get some more out of him about this muslim business.  blipey has done made him so mad that he has flipped out maybe he needs a distraction.  shhhh hes lookin

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Richard Simons



Posts: 425
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 18 2009,08:02   

I wanted to comment that, according to his description, the CSI of a baseball is way more than that of an aardvark then get him to justify it, but I've lost my password and can't be bothered to go through the rigmarole of getting back on. Perhaps someone who can easily comment there could ask him about it.

--------------
All sweeping statements are wrong.

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 18 2009,08:25   

Quote
can't be bothered to go through the rigmarole of getting back on


like knowing full well you quit but also knowing equally fully well that there is half a pack in the freezer...  not really going over it just idle daydreaming...  no chance of smoking a cigarette just knowing that they are there and if you had to...  nuclear holocaust or something...  maybe tomorrow..  joes blog is still there.  when all the tard dries up, Joe is conversing with rich on his blog.  llllllololol

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
Erasmus, FCD



Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 18 2009,17:44   

back in the gym rich is trying to get joe to show his junk work


Quote

Joe G said...
So how come you can't calculate it then, for a baseball?-

Calculate what?

Do you understand English?

Measurement- Do you understand the word "measurement"?

If you really want to know whether or not a baseball has CSI just follow the directions.

If you are too stupid to follow the directions then there isn't anything else I can do for you.

4:38 PM

Rich Hughes said...
I don't want my number (which I know is wrong) Joe. I want yours. what is it? Please show your workings.

9:39 AM

Joe G said...
I don't want my number (which I know is wrong) Joe.-

How do you know its wrong?

Did you follow the directions?

I want yours.-

And I don't care what you want.

I have provided more than enough to satisfy all but the incompetent and impotent assholes.

And as I said yesterday- there isn't anything else I can do for you.

12:04 PM


is it just a coincidence of chance and necessity that joe writes "impotent" and "assholes" in the same breath?  or is he thinking about something else?

are there any questions to which joe does not know the answer?  when joe wrestles with such a question, how does he go about answering it?  i'm just wondering

--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK

Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG

the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat

I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles

  
blipey



Posts: 2061
Joined: June 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 22 2009,09:12   

Joe reveals that he doesn't know the difference between a napkin and welding.

Not welding.

I've posted a comment he has refused to publish on either thread:

Quote
I can design a car on a napkin.  This is not a mechanism to make the car.  The mechanisms to make a car would inlude things like WELDING, CUTTING, WIRING, etc.

You do see the difference between "design" and "welding" right?

Must be too difficult to answer. :)

--------------
But I get the trick question- there isn't any such thing as one molecule of water. -JoeG

And scientists rarely test theories. -Gary Gaulin

   
Richard Simons



Posts: 425
Joined: Oct. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 22 2009,13:00   

Quote (blipey @ June 22 2009,09:12)
Joe reveals that he doesn't know the difference between a napkin and welding.

Not welding.

I've posted a comment he has refused to publish on either thread:

Quote
I can design a car on a napkin.  This is not a mechanism to make the car.  The mechanisms to make a car would inlude things like WELDING, CUTTING, WIRING, etc.

You do see the difference between "design" and "welding" right?

Must be too difficult to answer. :)

He got the definition of design from Mirriam-Webster so I'm surprised that he did not publish your comment then ridicule you for imagining you know better than the dictionary (but it is a rather odd definition).

--------------
All sweeping statements are wrong.

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 22 2009,13:27   

Quote (blipey @ June 22 2009,09:12)
Joe reveals that he doesn't know the difference between a napkin and welding.

Not welding.

I've posted a comment he has refused to publish on either thread:

Quote
I can design a car on a napkin.  This is not a mechanism to make the car.  The mechanisms to make a car would inlude things like WELDING, CUTTING, WIRING, etc.

You do see the difference between "design" and "welding" right?

Must be too difficult to answer. :)

I don't think Joe even knows the difference between a napkin and his "wedding tackle".  Of course, being an IDC advocate, this probably does not affect him an a day-to-day basis.

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
midwifetoad



Posts: 4003
Joined: Mar. 2008

(Permalink) Posted: June 22 2009,16:01   

Quote
He got the definition of design from Mirriam-Webster so I'm surprised that he did not publish your comment then ridicule you for imagining you know better than the dictionary (but it is a rather odd definition).


In the universe the rest of us live in his syllogism is known as the fallacy of equivocation.

--------------
Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 24 2009,12:07   

He's still going.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 25 2009,10:38   

He just linked to conservapedia to show me what's what.




Gooooooooooaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaal! Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal Goal!!!!!111111111one

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
Tracy



Posts: 4
Joined: June 2009

(Permalink) Posted: June 25 2009,11:59   

Hello.

My name is Tracy, and I have a tardcrush on Joe G.

This tardcrush consumes my waking hours.  It burns with the heat of a thousand suns.  It makes Mark Sanford’s lust for his piece of Argentine tail pale by comparison.

Every utterance, every insult, every intelligence-free statement committed to teh intertubes by Joe G only makes my crush for him grow.  This tardcrush is truly the love that dare not speak its name.  But yet, speak it – nay, shout it – I must.

Please, help me.  For the love of God, help me.

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 25 2009,12:06   

Tracy, I'm prepared to facilitate an introduction. I'm sure if you virtually cross paths he'll get 'round to offering to  "meet you face to face to sort things out" - it's his MO.

He is the dream package, intellectual and handyman all rolled together.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
J-Dog



Posts: 4402
Joined: Dec. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 25 2009,12:14   

Quote (Richardthughes @ June 25 2009,12:06)
Tracy, I'm prepared to facilitate an introduction. I'm sure if you virtually cross paths he'll get 'round to offering to  "meet you face to face to sort things out" - it's his MO.

He is the dream package, intellectual and handyman all rolled together.

Quote
He is the dream package, intellectual and handyman all rolled together.


Where intellectual means - able to read and believe an entire Chick Track at a single sitting...[

--------------
Come on Tough Guy, do the little dance of ID impotence you do so well. - Louis to Joe G 2/10

Gullibility is not a virtue - Quidam on Dembski's belief in the Bible Code Faith Healers & ID 7/08

UD is an Unnatural Douchemagnet. - richardthughes 7/11

  
Tracy P. Hamilton



Posts: 1239
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 25 2009,12:17   

Quote (Tracy @ June 25 2009,11:59)
Hello.

My name is Tracy, and I have a tardcrush on Joe G.

This tardcrush consumes my waking hours.  It burns with the heat of a thousand suns.  It makes Mark Sanford’s lust for his piece of Argentine tail pale by comparison.

Every utterance, every insult, every intelligence-free statement committed to teh intertubes by Joe G only makes my crush for him grow.  This tardcrush is truly the love that dare not speak its name.  But yet, speak it – nay, shout it – I must.

Please, help me.  For the love of God, help me.

I swear that is not me!

(Do I protest too much?)

--------------
"Following what I just wrote about fitness, you’re taking refuge in what we see in the world."  PaV

"The simple equation F = MA leads to the concept of four-dimensional space." GilDodgen

"We have no brain, I don't, for thinking." Robert Byers

  
Richardthughes



Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: June 25 2009,12:19   

Quote (Tracy P. Hamilton @ June 25 2009,12:17)
Quote (Tracy @ June 25 2009,11:59)
Hello.

My name is Tracy, and I have a tardcrush on Joe G.

This tardcrush consumes my waking hours.  It burns with the heat of a thousand suns.  It makes Mark Sanford’s lust for his piece of Argentine tail pale by comparison.

Every utterance, every insult, every intelligence-free statement committed to teh intertubes by Joe G only makes my crush for him grow.  This tardcrush is truly the love that dare not speak its name.  But yet, speak it – nay, shout it – I must.

Please, help me.  For the love of God, help me.

I swear that is not me!

(Do I protest too much?)

Unfortunately, Tracy, Joe's experience with black opps helicopters and fake moon landings will let him see right through your plausible-deniability ruse.

But at least when he whispers your name, it'll be *your* name.

--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine

  
  456 replies since April 23 2006,10:35 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (16) < ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]