2ndclass
Posts: 182
Joined: June 2006
|
dougp59: | Quote | | What are they looking for in the data? An INFERENCE of intelligence, which would lead them to conclude an intelligence responsible for sending the obviously 'designed' message . |
So an INFERENCE of intelligence would lead them to infer intelligence. Can't argue with that. Whenever I infer X, my very next step is always to infer X. Of course, that puts me in an endless loop of inference until I hit Ctrl-C.
dougp59: | Quote | | then why is an inference of intelligence in complex living systems here on earth not proof of an intelligent designer of that complex system? |
Who said it isn't? If you legitimately infer intelligent design in complex living systems, then by golly, those systems were intelligently designed. As an added bonus, you'll be famous.
--------------
"I wasn't aware that classical physics had established a position on whether intelligent agents exercising free were constrained by 2LOT into increasing entropy." -DaveScot
|
