EmperorZelos
Posts: 81
Joined: Oct. 2015
|
| Quote (Otangelo @ Nov. 20 2015,00:16) | Take one, just ONE of the peer reviewed papers in the two lists you provided, and post compelling reasons provided by the papers to accept abiogenesis and macro change, that is empirical data of a unorganized undirected unguided Neo-Darwinian accidental random macro-evolutionary event of a change/transition, where one "kind" can evolve into another beyond the species level (i.e. speciation) , like a organism randomly changing/transition into a whole entire different, new fully functioning biological features in an organism, the emergence of new complex functions, a new genus or higher rank in taxonomy, with the arise of new body plans, wings, eyes, lungs, gills, sexual gender, transition from prokaryotes to eukaryotes, the arise of photosynthesis and nitrogenase in cyanobacteria; something that we merely don't have to just put blind faith in.
Call me a liar does not help your case either. Its just a sign of despair. You can do better than that, can't u ? |
Why one when in science not ever is 1 piece of evidence enough, it's the collection of ALL evidence that matters.
As for liar, I call you a liar because you demonstrably LIE. We provide you with actual research and you say there is none. That is an outright lie.
|
