Otangelo
Posts: 149
Joined: Oct. 2015
|
| Quote (EmperorZelos @ Nov. 19 2015,23:41) | | Quote | | Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals |
And here we have it, excuse making when you cannot provide real evidence and scientists see it.
| Quote | Origin of life: no evidence
Biodiversity : no evidence that macro evolution above species ever happened. Plenty of reasons to reject the claims.....
Fossils : plenty of evidence they are young... |
This is an outright lie because I provided you long lists of evidence, proper peer reviewed ones. |
Take one, just ONE of the peer reviewed papers in the two lists you provided, and post compelling reasons provided by the papers to accept abiogenesis and macro change, that is empirical data of a unorganized undirected unguided Neo-Darwinian accidental random macro-evolutionary event of a change/transition, where one "kind" can evolve into another beyond the species level (i.e. speciation) , like a organism randomly changing/transition into a whole entire different, new fully functioning biological features in an organism, the emergence of new complex functions, a new genus or higher rank in taxonomy, with the arise of new body plans, wings, eyes, lungs, gills, sexual gender, transition from prokaryotes to eukaryotes, the arise of photosynthesis and nitrogenase in cyanobacteria; something that we merely don't have to just put blind faith in.
Call me a liar does not help your case either. Its just a sign of despair. You can do better than that, can't u ?
|
