NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
| Quote (Otangelo @ Nov. 19 2015,15:46) | | Quote (NoName @ Nov. 19 2015,14:44) | The nicest rejoinder is simply 'citation needed'.
You are arguing, badly, against a poorly constructed strawman.
Shameful.
But exactly what we have come to expect from you. |
Well, when you have rational and compelling answers of these issues through naturalism, let me know.... LOL.... |
This does not address the charge that you are arguing against a strawman version of science that you have made up simply to dismiss. Thus, citations are needed to show that the view(s) you are rejecting are actually held.
Insofar as you adequately present problems, e already have answers for most of them.
We have no reason to suppose we won't get the rest.
Meanwhile, creationism has no explanations.
All it has is "poof", which has no explanatory power at all.
And you still have not answered the question:
Why is abiogenesis impossible?
Your claim. Defend it or explicitly abandon it.
|
