Occam's Aftershave
Posts: 5287
Joined: Feb. 2006
|
| Quote (Otangelo @ Nov. 15 2015,11:01) | | Quote (OgreMkV @ July 27 2015,11:56) | Kirk Dunstan has an amazing case of hypocrisy.
He posts about whether we should have faith in science here: http://www.evolutionnews.org/2015.......51.html
Of course, he completely fails to mention that ID fails all of the tests he mentions. |
| Quote | | Of course, he completely fails to mention that ID fails all of the tests he mentions. |
Does it ? Could you provide a list of ID predictions that failed ?
In my book, the picture looks different
http://reasonandscience.heavenforum.org/t1659-c....ictions |
ID hasn't made any predictions that are exclusive to "Design". Every claimed ID prediction is actually a postdiction of events that are attributable to natural evolutionary processes. Every. Last. One.
IDiots love to play at science. They got tired of having no peer reviewed science articles so they created their own bogus IDiot journal, Bio-Complexity, so they could claim peer review. They got tired of having no predictions so they made some simple observations and claimed they are predicted by ID. Most are of the form "ID predicts the sky will be blue so a blue sky supports ID" worthless stupidity.
The simple fact is ID can't make any testable predictions unless and until they define the capabilities and limitations of their "Designer". Of course they never will because their "Designer" is their omnipotent God who literally could produce anything.
--------------
"CO2 can't re-emit any trapped heat unless all the molecules point the right way"
"All the evidence supports Creation baraminology"
"If it required a mind, planning and design, it isn't materialistic."
"Jews and Christians are Muslims."
- Joke "Sharon" Gallien, world's dumbest YEC.
|
