k.e..
Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007
|
| Quote (dazz @ Oct. 16 2015,05:10) | | Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 16 2015,03:49) | | Quote (NoName @ Oct. 15 2015,06:47) | | Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 15 2015,05:00) | | Quote (NoName @ Oct. 14 2015,16:52) | Also, he hasn't been entertaining so far -- why expect that to change?
He's a tedious little git and that's unlikely to change. |
I wrote my science and I shared my science not to entertain but give you either bad end or good end..
Good end if you would do science and agree with me...
Bad end if you ignore me and don't do science...
REMEMBER that I have science, the best the world has ever...
It is not a claim but a reality...read my science books and see if I'm telling a lie..
I think that you can refund to Amazon any book that is bought if you did not like them. Before, that is possible, I don't know now...
READ AND STUDY before you fight me in a debate since you will surely never win... |
We've already won. It's not even a battle.
You have already admitted that "good end" means simply "Edgar gets rich and famous". That's a pathetic 'good end'.
You have likewise admitted that "bad end" is what we have now. That's not so bad, particularly when you have nothing to offer that would improve what we have now.
You said very clearly that the only change that would accompany widespread acceptance of your notions would be that you would become rich and famous.
That does not represent any improvement in human knowledge or understanding, it suggest no new research opportunities, it has zero explanatory power, it is so intellectually impoverished as to be non-intellectual.
I cannot 'remember' that you have science, let alone "the best science' if you have never shown that you have any science at all. And you have never shown that you have any science at all.
Further, "the best science" is an odd claim -- how are sciences rated from 'worst' to 'best'? Why, in terms of explanatory power, evidentiary support, and so on.
You have neither explanatory power nor evidentiary support. When you have tried to produce either, the results have been laughable.
So, all we remember is that you are a foolish lunatic burdened with delusions of grandeur.
You have yet to enter a debate. That is yet another word you do not understand. It has a well-understood meaning.
And it is well understood that you are incapable of debating.
You are wrong on every point. |
I've already debating you and presenting you a very simple and obvious empirical evidence but yet you did not want to yield.
Then, I will never yield too, thus, we can never agree. BUT
YOU ARE NOT A SERIOUS PERSON
- since you did not have a replacement for the new and universal intelligence vs mine
- since you did not read my science books to know what is the real intelligence
- since you did not make any experiment for your claim that you have the right explanation of intelligence and I'm wrong
YOU HAVE NO CREDENTIALS
- since you did not write science books to show that you could summarize the 80 definitions of intelligence that ToE's supporters had messed
- since you are not a scholar like me
- since you have no clue about engineering
- since you have never tried submitting a manuscript in science journals especially the topic of intelligence...
THUS, YOU CANNOT win AGAINST ME..
I have science and I offer the best...and you have nothing... |
I'm pretty sure all of us have better education and degrees than you. I know I do, and your degrees in Manila wouldn't land you a job as a janitor here, what are you doing for a living in Japan? Selling tissues at traffic lights?
You know full well that you've been presented with experiments refuting your crap, alternative definitions, and evidence supporting the alternatives.
You're just far too retarded and pathetic to let go.
You're an insignificant little gimp with no science books |
Slow down there chief "selling tissues at traffic lights" in Japan?. That may happen in Dar es salaam or Manilla but in Tokoyo all beggars have to do is set up their cardboard houses just before dark on a pedestrian bridge near a railway station and passers-by will give them money. Panhandling just doesn't happen there. By morning they're gone. It's such a civilized place Mr. Postcreationism is only guilty of question begging.
--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin
|
