RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (527) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 5, Return To Teh Dingbat Buffet< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: Oct. 21 2018,13:02   

Quote (Jkrebs @ Oct. 21 2018,13:33)
Quote (stevestory @ Oct. 20 2018,15:49)
BarryMath:

 
Quote
Saturday Fun: When the Lottery Bet Has a Positive Expected Value
October 20, 2018 Posted by Barry Arrington under Intelligent Design
No Comments
This is one of those very rare times when the lottery bet has a positive mathematical expected value. Expected value is calculated as: (Amount possibly won * probability of winning) minus (Amount of bet * probability of losing).

The probability of winning Mega Millions is 1 in 302,575,350. The next jackpot is $904 million (cash value of $1.6 billion annuity). The expected value is ($904,000,000 * 1/302,575,350) minus ($2.00 * .9999999999999999999) = $0.98.

This means on average in the long run, for every $2.00 ticket you buy, you would expect to win $2.98 if the jackpot were always $904 million.  Of course, you still lose the whole $2.00 every time you lose, which is almost always.  Still, on average, over the long run, the expected value is positive ($2.98 – $2.00 = $0.98).

In the long run, it is a good bet. Of course, the problem is there is no long run. You only have a single shot at it. To achieve the long run average expectation, you would have to play several hundred million times.


he's not doing the math right.

Hmmm. What's wrong with Barry's math. Is not the expected value for a ticket $0.98???

his analysis is missing a few terms. Taxes reduce the EV, and he's got no terms for winning a lower pot cuz multiple winners.

   
  15792 replies since Dec. 29 2013,11:01 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (527) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]