RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (527) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 5, Return To Teh Dingbat Buffet< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Glen Davidson



Posts: 1100
Joined: May 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 27 2017,23:24   

I have no idea whether or not Stonehenge was made by intelligence or not.  How could I?  Is it anywhere near to the complexity of a fishing reel?  Well, maybe some, but not the Ambassador 6500 C3 CT MAG 09 00.  I know that was designed, and of course RNA synthetase was.

But Stonehenge?  It's just too simple to tell.  And it lacks vestigial organs, and complex pathways like the descent of the testes (from about the position they are in fish--surely only a designer would know that and design it to be made there as it is in fishes).  It isn't made overly complicated, like rigid bird wings made out of bones that were articulated in their terrestrial dinosaurian ancestors.  Only these sorts of things are obviously designed, not simple, straightforward shapes and positions of stones in Stonehenge.

When are these idiots going to start using their superior skills in detecting design?  Life and Ambassador 6500 fishing reels are obviously designed, not Stonehenge.  It's laughable that anyone could know that Stonehenge was designed when it's such a simple structure.  A/mats think that they can determine design in Stonehenge, but why are righteous IDiots being suckered in by wanton materialistic evil beliefs that simple things can be determined to have been designed?

Glen Davidson

--------------
http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p....p

Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of coincidence---ID philosophy

   
  15792 replies since Dec. 29 2013,11:01 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (527) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]