stevestory
Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote (REC @ Aug. 29 2016,01:04) | http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?....k&gl=us
| Quote | | Nevertheless – and I have to say this – the book contains numerous mathematical, scientific and philosophical blunders, which a sharp-eyed critic could easily spot. I didn’t notice them right away: like many avid readers, I skimmed the book for its most interesting bits, when I first received it. But when I perused the book at leisure, making notes of each chapter’s key points, the fallacies in the author’s arguments leapt out at me. What bothered me most was that the book misrepresented Darwinism, and exaggerated the strength of the case against it, by appealing to a series of poor analogies. In the end, these errors provoked me to such a degree that they made me want to take up the cudgels on behalf of Darwin – something I have not done for a long, long time. |
So....at UD today, white supremacy is OK, but critiques of Axe disappear. |
that 8,237 words. That's not going to disappear forever. We're going to see that again somewhere.
and yeah, i saved it to multiple places. I've just scanned through it, but he appears to have talked to actual scientists, and presented their explanations as to why Axe is completely wrong. Heavens to Betsy!
|
