stevestory
Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote | 179
Indiana EffigyApril 23, 2016 at 2:49 pm
KF@178: “PS: You have fallen into the classic trap of being selectively hypercritical in looking at what those you disagree with speak of.”
You mean the classic trap of claiming that your arguments are based on false assumptions and supporting my claims? Yes, I can see why you would rather criticize my motive than my argument.
“Go look up the exploded view diagram for a 6500 C3 round reel,”
I have seen you repeat this many times and all you have proven is that a fishing reel designed by humans is a good evidence for a fishing reel designed by humans.
“. Use AutoCAD as description language generator and do a drawing file, which will be a collection of bit strings describing a 3-d functionally specific config. Ponder what happens when you play around with the bits and pieces at random, they soon become non functional.”
OK, I get it. Human designed things are prone to losing function upon variation.
“Same for text strings in posts here and in code. Punch in a bit of noise and see how fast function is lost.”
Actually, this is not true. You can leave out a significant number of matters, and even rearrange them, and the message can still be deciphered. But, again, human design.
“Islands of function are real, and are relevant to cell based life.”
Repeating this will not make it true. I explained why. Argue against my reasons if you can, but please stop making unsubstantiated assertions. Your argument is that loss of function means death. Which is not the case. You can’t produce vitamin C due to loss of function. Many adults cannot digest lactose due to lack of function. Neither are resulting in mass deaths. |
hahahaha
Edited by stevestory on April 23 2016,22:36
|
