midwifetoad
Posts: 4003 Joined: Mar. 2008
|
Quote (CeilingCat @ Nov. 20 2015,11:34) | peteFun nails Bully: Quote | Look – it’s going to be hard to admit when you’re wrong when you accuse someone of “insane denialism”. I know you can’t possibly backtrack now. It would indicate that what you call “insane denialism” is actually a reasonable alternative interpretation you failed to foresee, so you really have no “out”. But whatever gets page views, I guess. | 126 peteFun November 19, 2015 at 9:44 pm
That's Bully: Out on a limb with no way to crawl back. Don't worry though. In Barryland, insults constitute an effective reply to any evidence or argument. |
It's not just that Arrington "failed to foresee" Darwin's Fourth Edition. He failed to read what Darwin said before pronouncing on what Darwin said.
So Barry's position now is:
What Darwin said <> What Darwin said
That sounds familiar.
-------------- Any version of ID consistent with all the evidence is indistinguishable from evolution.
|