RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (527) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 5, Return To Teh Dingbat Buffet< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
stevestory



Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005

(Permalink) Posted: July 28 2015,14:28   

Quote
15
Ray Martinez

July 28, 2015 at 12:59 pm
Quote
“Ray Martinez, I am hardly pro-Darwin and it is hardly an ‘argument from authority’ to say that Darwin’s theory is reliant on bad theological premises when I in fact listed a peer reviewed paper outlining the theological core of Darwin’s own book.


You’re a bad listener/reader. I said:

“Here our pro-Darwin “IDist” simply repeats the claims of C. Hunter while adding the fact that Hunter has a doctorate—which is known as an invalid argument-from-authority. The implication is that Hunter is correct based only on the fact of his advanced degree.’
Quote

16
Ray Martinez

July 28, 2015 at 1:17 pm
Concerning msg #11 by “bornagain77″

The first thing that needs to be said is that I answered OP author C. Hunter directly in blockquotes followed by my replies (msg #9). Bornagain77 completely ignored these replies and repeated the claims of Hunter using his own words. This indicates an inability to refute.

The second thing that needs to be said is the fact that bornagain77 uses secondary sources, unlike myself. I used primary sources. The rule is that if a primary source is contradicted by a secondary source then the burden of proof falls on the secondary source to produce primary sources to support his or her claims.

Bornagain77 simply parrots a secondary source and declares victory.

   
  15792 replies since Dec. 29 2013,11:01 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (527) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]