stevestory
Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote | 228
Larry MoranMay 19, 2015 at 7:10 pm
Mung says,
You have your minimalist definition of evolution and expect us to respect it [and rightly so]. Likewise, we have our minimalist definition of intelligent design and would just like to see it respected in turn.
Vincent Torley posted something resembling a minimalist definition of ID in his post ….
A succinct case for Intelligent Design
I responded to that succinct case at …
The best case for Intelligent Design Creationism
I pointed out that Torley’s “succinct case” was simply “four separate scientific critiques demonstrating the inadequacy of the neo-Darwinian mechanism.” That’s not really a case for ID, is it?
In this post (top) Torley retreats and claims that I should have read other parts of Meyer’s book in order to understand the real “succinct case” for ID.
It’s all very confusing. Perhaps you could give me your version of a minimalist definition of intelligent design? Please make sure that the other ID proponents in this thread agree with you. |
Larry's clearly enjoying himself
|
