RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (527) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 5, Return To Teh Dingbat Buffet< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Wesley R. Elsberry



Posts: 4991
Joined: May 2002

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 06 2015,21:56   

Quote (Patrick @ Feb. 06 2015,15:37)
Okay, this got me to peek over at UD for the first time in months.  The first sentence of Ewert's abstract:

   
Quote
According to conservation of information theorems, performance of an arbitrarily chosen search, on average, does no better than blind search.


This is a typical IDCist misstatement of the No Free Lunch theorems.  A more accurate summary is "No algorithm outperforms blind search when averaged over all possible search landscapes."

On a particular landscape, of course, some algorithms far outperform blind search.  Leaving aside the issues with modeling evolution as a search, fitness landscapes like those we find in our environment are quite amenable to search by known evolutionary mechanisms.

When he starts off with an error of that magnitude, I don't have a lot of confidence in what's coming next.

Nothing new under the sun, apparently.

--------------
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker

    
  15792 replies since Dec. 29 2013,11:01 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (527) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]