REC
Posts: 638
Joined: Sep. 2006
|
| Quote (franky172 @ April 14 2014,11:31) | Barry posts the following:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelli....-496343
Which he thinks shows that religion and classics students do better at the LSAT than, say, specialized Biology students. Of course, it shows the exact opposite - that specialized biology students do better at the LSAT compared to religion students. DESPITE HAVING LOWER UGPA's. In fact, the low LSAT average for religionmajors conditioned on their GPA is probably indicative of grade inflation for religion majors.
Those students who chose to specialize in a particular kind of Biology (re: interested students) do better than their GPA would indicate on the LSAT.
EDIT: Actually, BOTH regular biology majors AND specialized biology majors do better than their GPA should indicate on the LSAT. Religion majors? Not so much. |
Also:
BIOLOGY, SPECIALIZATION 155.8
CHEMISTRY 152.1
BIOLOGY 149.
LAW 147.6
PRE-LAW 147.1
ACCOUNTING 148.3
Does this disqualify Barry, the CPA/Lawyer from rational discussion?
No, of course not.
Does Barry's being---Barry disqualify him from rational discussion?
|
