DiEb
Posts: 312
Joined: May 2008
|
New's reading skills:
In her article Retract that, sir, or face the consequences! Er, maybe., Denyse shows again her attention to details. She writes: "Top ten retractions of 2010, courtesy The Scientist..." While the first number mentioned in the article is indeed 2010, the year about which "The Scientist" is writing is 2013 (much more topical). That's why the journal used the title "Top 10 Retractions of 2013".
I mentioned that in a comment over there which died in the moderation queue....
|
