GaryGaulin
Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012
|
| Quote (OgreMkV @ Dec. 17 2012,09:04) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 17 2012,08:40) | The only thing I see added to discussion, is more evidence that evolutionary biologists are completely unqualified to judge scientific theory of any kind.
A 5 year old that watches PBS "Dinosaur Train" and such can actually be more qualified. I'm actually serious, because they at least have the scientific basics, as opposed to a sabotaged scientific method that is only good for stopping all new theories.
Where discussion now stands, evolutionary theory cannot be falsified. So even their own "theory" is now by their own standards a pseudoscience. |
Hmm.... apparently you can't read.
Did I not just list 5 pieces of evidence that would falsify evolution?
Let me ask you (not that you actually answer questions or anything), if you saw a rock falling upwards, would that falsify all of Newton's work on gravity?
Finally, because you still haven't answered...
| Quote | What is science if it's not falsifiable, naturalistic, and methodical?
Are you aware, that if science is not those three things, then anything 'scientific' you do is doomed to failure just as anything real people do? If you truly believe that science is not falsifiable, naturalistic, and methodical, then by using the tools of science to disprove the entire concept of science, you are the ultimate hypocrite. |
|
Discovery of one anomaly would not force Darwinian theory to be immediately thrown out of science, therefore you did not "falsify" it.
--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
|
