Erasmus, FCD
Posts: 6349
Joined: June 2007
|
| Quote (OgreMkV @ Dec. 16 2012,21:25) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 16 2012,18:30) | | Quote (blipey @ Dec. 16 2012,09:42) | | I really want to know how seeing things violates the separation of church and state. Surely this national security crisis deserves more play. Tell us, oh wise one. Don't tease us, Gary Schnookums, fill us in. |
Without having to go into sordid historical examples such as similar repression by the Stalinist Atheism movement, the NCSE and others have been using the ID controversy to impose their religious/philosophical views into the science classrooms. Popperism (falsification), philosophical naturalism, and other scientifically useless philosophies which only lead to arguments (normally because of those who correctly point out that it's not really "science" it's their personal philosophy/religion) are all examples of how the science classrooms can be used to promote a religious world-view. Scientific integrity is sabotaged, for the benefit of self-appointed control-freaks who need to redefine "theory" and "hypothesis" in order to stop progress of emerging sciences and scientists who do not help further their religious goals. |
I know I'm going to regret this...
But what is science if it's not falsifiable, naturalistic, and methodical? |
i've never heard someone, including giggle's, talk this absurdist type bullshit about the philosophy of science that had anything at all remotely resembling a fucking point about anything other than "have you ever really looked at your hand my code, man"
in this case, we are told that this virtual insect disproves evilution, or unintelligent design, or fractals, or multiple level selection, or some fucking thing I am not sure giggles knows either.
when asked how, he says "it's not my job to test that it's yours, it's just my job to point out how dumb gay and drunk all the evilutionists are" or something functionally equivalent but more poorly worded and passive voiced
here is a perfect chance to show us how he uses his anti popperian fuck hypothesis testing design theosophist philolology to teach us something new and unique about the real world that no one could have ever done before until he got the planet code sorcerer thingy.
but what does he do he posts y00t00b like he's the dj at some shitty debate club party
--------------
You're obviously illiterate as hell. Peach, bro.-FtK
Finding something hard to believe based on the evidence, is science.-JoeG
the odds of getting some loathsome taint are low-- Gordon E Mullings Manjack Heights Montserrat
I work on molecular systems with pathway charts and such.-Giggles
|
