RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (25) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Jerry Don Bauer's Thread, Lather, Rinse, Repeat< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
The whole truth



Posts: 1554
Joined: Jan. 2012

(Permalink) Posted: Dec. 15 2012,07:39   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 14 2012,23:51)
 
Quote (Richardthughes @ Dec. 14 2012,23:23)
     
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 14 2012,23:04)
       
Quote (stevestory @ Dec. 14 2012,18:45)
           
Quote

Somewhat OFF Topic but here on GaryJerryBillyBobFtKJoeG's thread I've sort of lost what ON Topic is.


The metatopic is how sad and low-energy this place is, now that the ID creationists with two brain cells to rub together have slunk off the stage, and we're just left with a few people who are very likely legitimately mentally disabled, and the attendant ethical questions posed w/r/t making fun of them.


In my honest opinion: The real reason for how sad and low-energy this place is, is what I have been trying to explain that has to do with PT not having kept up with the major science paradigm changers like the earlier mentioned PNAS Müller cells are living optical fibers in the vertebrate retina.

PT is simply becoming a dated world-view. Sadly, now a bad place to look for current reliable information. And its connected forum is ruled by those who fight any attempt to stay current. So you are (metaphorically speaking) getting what you deserve...


That's right Gaga. So why are you here with your VB code if we're the metaphorical Dodos of origins? Why do you correct your idiotic 'theory' based on us laughing at it?


Oh, My theory has 100% 5 stars. Yours, does not, so is inferior.

EDITZ

And that is some of the usual nonsense awaiting those who dare suggest that the ID issue is far more than their simple imaginary evolution/origins issue where one side is in denial of science. In the ID camp that I know (where there are serious people needing sound advice to know things way or another) none I know are even denying evolution or "origins" science the problem has all along been not satisfactorily explaining macroevolution scale changes.

Searching for a more complete scientific view is something ganged up against. It should instead be something cherished because of science needing those who attempt to go beyond what was known before, not those who will never even try.

Gary, will you please elaborate on why you think that "macroevolution scale changes" has not been explained satisfactorily?

 
Quote
Searching for a more complete scientific view is something ganged up against. It should instead be something cherished because of science needing those who attempt to go beyond what was known before, not those who will never even try.


I agree that "Searching for a more complete scientific view" is something that should be cherished, as long as the search is scientific. None of the typical ID claims are scientific and I don't see the typical IDiots searching for anything other than the destruction of evolutionary science and total religious dominance of everyone and everything on Earth. Your 'search' may be scientific in some ways but I don't see that it's searching for or finding what you seem to think it is.

It's often difficult or impossible to figure out what you're trying to say about your 'theory' and I find myself 'searching' for clarity and relevant evidence in your claims. I also wonder about the urge that drives you and whether you're really interested in a scientific search or in pushing a religious/political agenda. I've seen signs of both from you and I haven't completely made my mind up about what you're trying to accomplish. I admire your persistence even though I'm not convinced that you have a valid argument for your version of ID. You have a lot more guts than chickenshit bloviators like gordon e mullings (kairosfocus), barry arrington, vj torley, luskin, o'leary, klinghoffer, and many other typical IDiots who spew their dishonest insanity in heavily moderated or closed to comments sanctuaries like UD or ENV. You deserve some credit for being willing to face the fire here even if you ultimately fail to convince anyone of your claims.

--------------
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Jesus in Matthew 10:34

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. -Jesus in Luke 19:27

   
  740 replies since Nov. 21 2012,08:55 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (25) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]