coldfirephoenix
Posts: 62
Joined: Sep. 2017
|
| Quote | | Other than the premise stating "intelligent cause" not "intelligent designer" there is no difference, same process/entity. |
Yes, we know. It's intelligent design, by any definition.
The statement I quoted at the beginning of this post clearly states that there is no difference between an intelligent designer and an intelligent cause, they are the "same process/entity", according to you.
Now, why did you try for so long to weasel out of answering this question, which we all knew the answer to anyway?
Because here we get a perfect example of why you keep shooting yourself in the foot.
You have a "theory" of gibberish that you can not only not express coherently, no, you haven't even finished making it up all the way. There literally doesn't exist a coherent idea of this, not even in your own brain. All you have is a spiritually inspired vague idea that you want to be true, and a bunch of woowoo to defend it. But since you don't even have a clear idea of what exactly you are trying to defend, you keep making the woowoo up as you go along. Whatever seems plausible to you at any given point is what your gibberish means.
Of course, this inevitably leads to you contradicting yourself at every corner, because there is no consistency in made up stuff you haven't even clearly defined for yourself.
Let's look at some quotes of people contradicting you, shall we?
| Quote | | stop moving the goalposts by adding things into the premise of the theory that are not in there like "intelligent designer" instead of "intelligent cause". |
Oh, whoops, that is awkward, if the two are the same entity, how is it moving the goalposts to use the other term? Whoever wrote that quote must strongly disagree with you!
And here's another guy who seems to disagree completely with you:
| Quote | Intelligent Designer related questions such as those are best answered at this forum:
www.reddit.com/r/askashittyphilosopher/ |
He even implies that any mentions of an intelligent designer are a sign of shitty philosophy!
| Quote | | Never judge a book by its cover. Likewise: Never judge a theory by its title. |
Ha, and whoever wrote this clearly doesn't know that "there is no difference [between intelligent designer or intelligent cause], same process/entity."
So, who were all those guys who contradicted you? Why, it was all you, Gary! In fact, you were the only one who contradicted yourself on this matter, the rest of was saying that this was clearly intelligent design from the start. But good to know that we are on the same page on that one, at least until you flip-flop next time, and decide your "theory" shouldn't be about an intelligent designer after all, then the two will suddenly be completely different things again.
|
